Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One-world-government Walter Cronkite: ĎIím glad to sit at the right hand of Sataní
Fellowship of the Minds ^ | Sept. 17, 2018 | Dr. Eowyn

Posted on 09/17/2018 1:29:18 PM PDT by Eowyn2

In 1999 at the UN, Walter Cronkite declared his support and allegiance to a one-world government. He blamed the refusal of the U.S. Congress to ratify one-world-government treaties on “a handful” of obdurate senators who “pander” to the Christian Coalition and the “religious right wing”.

Identifying Pat Robertson as the leader of the Christian Coalition, Cronkite quoted Robertson, that “any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the Devil.” Cronkite then mocked Robertson by declaring, “I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan.”

(Excerpt) Read more at fellowshipoftheminds.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: 666; antiamericanism; antichrist; antisovereignty; blogpimp; bushleaguegop; clickbait; collusion; demoncrats; devil; enemedia; globalism; liberaljournalist; newworldorder; oneworldgovt; satan; satanism; seebsnews; unamericanactivities; waltercronkite; worldgovernment; worldgovt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 09/17/2018 1:29:18 PM PDT by Eowyn2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

May he burn in hell.....................


2 posted on 09/17/2018 1:32:18 PM PDT by Red Badger (July 2018 - the month the world learns the TRUTH......Q Anon.......Timelines change. Aug 16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

Yep


3 posted on 09/17/2018 1:32:32 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“And that’s the way it is.”


4 posted on 09/17/2018 1:33:20 PM PDT by luvbach1 (I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2
Cronkite then mocked Robertson by declaring, “I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan.”

Except...he really meant it. Hope he's enjoying his company now.

5 posted on 09/17/2018 1:33:21 PM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP! WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

I suspect the people who put him in charge of CBS news, knew exactly what they were doing.

Walter really was a dishonest man but for once he was telling the truth.`


6 posted on 09/17/2018 1:34:23 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

He should be careful what he wish for.


7 posted on 09/17/2018 1:35:29 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

The only difference between Hanoi Jane and Hanoi Walter is Hanoi Jane wasn’t as good at spinning her commie-loving, American-hating “ideas”.


8 posted on 09/17/2018 1:39:27 PM PDT by samtheman (Let’s elect as many Republicans as possible in 2018)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

Found this....

9 posted on 09/17/2018 1:43:30 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2
In 1999 at the UN, Walter Cronkite declared his support and allegiance to a one-world government. He blamed the refusal of the U.S. Congress to ratify one-world-government treaties on “a handful” of obdurate senators who “pander” to the Christian Coalition and the “religious right wing”.

Secular humanists worship evolution and believe that a truly humanist civilization must be the product of an evolution into a world community based on humanist principles necessitating a world government.

10 posted on 09/17/2018 1:44:16 PM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

Well Cronkite does mean a sick person after all. And don’t forget ole Walter said he could see himself marrying a man and he said it while his wife was still alive.

He was a despicable man and that’s the best you could say about him.


11 posted on 09/17/2018 1:44:31 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberal is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

I was no fan of Cronkite but do you have any documentation that this is true? I have never heard of this website.


12 posted on 09/17/2018 1:48:25 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2
Wally certainly regrets that statement!
13 posted on 09/17/2018 1:48:57 PM PDT by heterosupremacist (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

Bkmk


14 posted on 09/17/2018 1:49:23 PM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

There is video of his speech on youtube.

And Walter says that Americans are just going to have to give up ‘some’ sovereignty.

And he says that he supported these goals going back to the 30s or 40s.


15 posted on 09/17/2018 1:56:38 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2
VIDEO: One-world-government Walter Cronkite: ‘I’m glad to sit at the right hand of Satan'
16 posted on 09/17/2018 1:58:59 PM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

On the authority of God’s Infallible Word; Cronkite is not happy now; nor has he been since 30 seconds after he slipped the mortal coil here on terra firma.


17 posted on 09/17/2018 2:00:16 PM PDT by Tucker39 ("It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

Speak of the devil and he appears...

CC


18 posted on 09/17/2018 2:01:36 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Do you know what really burns my ass? A flame about 3 feet high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

What a dreadful, dreadful man.


19 posted on 09/17/2018 2:02:54 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn2

I had read this some years back and posted this on FR.

Honestly, I was flabbergasted.

I knew he was a Lefty, and never cared for him. But reading this, I realized he was fully into this treasonous agenda. All those years of sailing around Nantucket Sound with Ted Kennedy, it isn’t too hard to imagine what those conversations were like. I admit that I didn’t realize for so many years just how treasonous he was. I just thought he was a Leftist gas bag.

From the time I learned about his interpretation of the Tet Offensive as a massive defeat for the US, I didn’t have much use for him, and ignored him. If I had known this years earlier...still makes me steaming mad to read it.

**********************************************************************************

WALTER CRONKITE PROMOTES DEMOCRATIC FEDERAL WORLD GOVERNMENT
Received W.F.A.’s Norman Cousins Global Governance Award on 19 October 1999

I am greatly honored to receive this award for two reasons: first, I believe as Norman Cousins did that the first priority of humankind in this era is to establish an effective system of world law that will assure peace with justice among the peoples of the world; second, I feel sentimental about this award because half a century ago Norman offered me a job as spokesman and Washington lobbyist for the World Federalist organization, which was then in its infancy.

I chose instead to continue in the world of journalism. For many years, I did my best to report on the issues of the day in as objective a manner as possible. When I had my own strong opinions, as I often did, I tried not to communicate them to my audience. Now, however, my circumstances are different. I am in a position to speak my mind. And that is what I propose to do.

Those of us who are living today can influence the future of civilization. We can influence whether our planet will drift into chaos and violence, or whether through a monumental educational and political effort we will achieve a world of peace under a system of law where individual violators of that law are brought to justice.

For most of this fairly long life I have been an optimist harboring a belief that as our globe shrank, as our communication miracles brought us closer together, we would begin to appreciate the commonality of our universal desire to live in peace and that we would do something to satisfy that yearning of all peoples. Today I find it harder to cling to that hope. For how many thousands of years now have we humans been what we insist on calling “civilized”? And yet, in total contradiction, we also persist in the savage belief that we must occasionally, at least, settle our arguments by killing one another.

While we spend much of our time and a great deal of our treasure in preparing for war, we see no comparable effort to establish a lasting peace. Meanwhile, emphasizing the sloth in this regard, those advocates who work for world peace by urging a system of world government are called impractical dreamers. Those “impractical dreamers” are entitled to ask their critics, “what is so practical about war?”

It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order. But the American colonies did it once and brought forth one of the most nearly perfect unions the world has ever seen. The circumstances were vastly different, obviously. Yet just because the task appears forbiddingly hard, we should not shirk it. We cannot defer this responsibility to posterity. Democracy, civilization itself, is at stake. Within the next few years we must change the basic structure of our global community from the present anarchic system of war and ever more destructive weaponry to a new system governed by a democratic U.N. federation.

Let’s focus on a few specifics of what the leadership of the World Federalist movement believe must be done now to advance the rule of world law. For starters, we can draw on the wisdom of the Framers of the U.S. Constitution of 1787. The differences among the American states then were as bitter as differences among nation-states in the world today. In their almost miraculous insight, the Founders of our country invented ‘federalism,’ a concept that is rooted in the rights of the individual. Our federal system guarantees a maximum of freedom but provides it in a framework of law and justice. Our forefathers believed that the closer the laws are to the people, the better. Cities legislate on local matters; states make decisions on matters within their borders; and the national government deals with issues that transcend the states, such as interstate commerce and foreign relations. That is federalism.

Today we must develop federal structures on a global level. We need a system of enforceable world law —a democratic federal world government— to deal with world problems. What Alexander Hamilton wrote about the need for law among the 13 states applies today to the approximately 200 sovereignties in our global village: “To look for a continuation of harmony between a number of independent unconnected sovereignties in the same neighborhood, would be to disregard the uniform course of human events, and to set at defiance the accumulated experience of ages.” Today the notion of unlimited national sovereignty means international anarchy. We must replace the anarchic law of force with a civilized force of law.

Ours will neither be a perfect world, nor a world without disagreement and occasional violence. But it will be a world where the vast majority of national leaders will consistently abide by the rule of world law, and those who won’t will be dealt with effectively and with due process by the structures of that same world law. We will never have a city without crime, but we would never want to live in a city that had no system of law to deal with criminals.

Let me make three suggestions for immediate action that would move us in a direction firmly in the American tradition of law and democracy.

1. Keep our promises: We helped create the U.N. and to develop the U.N. assessment formula. Americans overwhelmingly want us to pay our U.N. dues, with no crippling limitations. We owe it to the world. In fact, we owe it as well to our national self-esteem.

2. Ratify the Treaty to Ban Land Mines, the Law of the Sea Treaty, the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Most important, we should sign and ratify the Treaty for a permanent International Criminal Court. That Court will enable the world to hold individuals accountable for crimes against humanity.

3. Consider, after 55 years, the possibility of a more representative and democratic system of decision making at the U.N. This should include both revision of the veto in the Security Council and adoption of a weighted voting system for the General Assembly. The World Federalists have endorsed Richard Hudson’s Binding Triad proposal. George Soros, in “The Crisis of Global Capitalism,” has given serious attention to this concept which would be based upon not only one-nation-one-vote but also on population and contributions to the U.N. budget. Resolutions adopted by majorities in each of these areas would be binding, enforceable law. Within the powers given to it in the Charter, the U.N. could then deal with matters of reliable financing, a standing U.N. peace force, development, the environment and human rights.

Some of you may ask why the Senate is not ratifying these important treaties and why the Congress is not paying our U.N. dues. As with the American rejection of the League of Nations, our failure to live up to our obligations to the U.N. is led by a few willful senators who choose to pursue their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our nation’s conscience. They pander to and are supported by the Christian Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing. Their leader, Pat Robertson, has written that we should have a world government but only when the messiah arrives. Attempts for world order before that time are the work of the Devil! This small but well-organized group has intimidated both the Republican Party and the Clinton administration. It has attacked presidents since F.D.R. for supporting the U.N. Robertson explains that these presidents are the unwitting agents of Lucifer.

The only way we who believe in the vision of a democratic world federal government can effectively overcome this reactionary movement is to organize a strong educational counteroffensive stretching from the most publicly visible people in all fields to the humblest individuals in every community. That is the vision and program of the World Federalist Association. The strength of the World Federalist program would serve an important auxiliary purpose at this particular point in our history. There would be immediate diplomatic advantages if the world knew that this country was even beginning to explore the prospect of strengthening the U.N. We would appear before the peoples of the world as the champion of peace for all by the equitable sharing of power. This in sharp contrast to the growing concern that we intend to use our current dominant military power to enforce a sort of pax Americana.

Our country today is at a stage in our foreign policy similar to that crucial point in our nation’s early history when our Constitution was produced in Philadelphia. Let us hear the peal of a new international liberty bell that calls us all to the creation of a system of enforceable world law in which the universal desire for peace can place its hope and prayers. As Carl Van Doren has written, “History is now choosing the founders of the World Federation. Any person who can be among that number and fails to do so has lost the noblest opportunity of a lifetime.”


20 posted on 09/17/2018 2:07:47 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson