Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

this date 1942, in French Naval History

Posted on 11/27/2017 3:51:18 PM PST by Bull Snipe

As German Army units overran the French Naval Base at Toulon France, French sailors and officers scuttled their ships to prevent them from falling into German hands. When it was over, 77 French Naval vessels, including 3 battleships, 3 heavy cruiser, 4 light cruisers, 15 destroyers and 12 submarines rest on the bottom of Toulon harbor.


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: france; godsgravesglyphs; toulon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Bartholomew Roberts

The French Navy followed the orders of the Vichy Government. Not enough fuel to get to North Africa, let alone the UK, the Vichy government assented to that demand by the Germans.


21 posted on 11/27/2017 4:24:13 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

>The French fought damned hard in WWI and lost far more than the Brits. They fought hard in WWII and lost. Under captivity they behaved about the way we would expect the British to. Some were heroes, some were not.

The French fought like crap in WW2. They gave up, ran away, their officers shat their britches and fled. The British had to lock them in cellars to prevent them from surrendering towns the right from under the British troops defending them.

Read “Inside the Nazi War Machine” by Bevin Alexander to get a feel for how well the French fought. It’s not pretty.


22 posted on 11/27/2017 4:27:35 PM PST by JohnyBoy (The GOP Senate is intentionally trying to lose the majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bartholomew Roberts

That’s November 27th 1942, Paris fell to the Germans in 1940.


23 posted on 11/27/2017 4:27:43 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
The French fought bravely in many instances

Yes, during WWII, the French successfully defended Dakar against a French invasion.

They lost to the British in Syria, the Germans in France, the US in North Africa, and the Thais in Cambodia. Almost forgot the Italian victory in Southern France.

24 posted on 11/27/2017 4:29:48 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour

>Dunkirk was a strategic retreat. No surrender there.

Dunkirk was an act of survival for the UK. If the Nazis had captured the BEF there the war would have been over.

>Singapore was indefensible without adequate air and naval support. In neither case was Britain defending its home turf.

UK forces screwed the pooch there. Japanese troops went overland without supplies to attack the city in the rear. However, it shouldn’t have worked. The Japanese force was a 1/4 the UK force and the city was heavily fortified. All they had to do was put a minor resistance and the Japanese army would have had to withdraw. But as typical in WW2 UK commanders were awful and turned what should have been an easy victory into a defeat.


25 posted on 11/27/2017 4:31:45 PM PST by JohnyBoy (The GOP Senate is intentionally trying to lose the majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe

“3 battleships, 3 heavy cruiser, 4 light cruisers, 15 destroyers and 12 submarines” would have doubled the German Navy - may have been enough to enable them to cross the channel.


26 posted on 11/27/2017 4:34:14 PM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe

So who was the master tactician that didn’t move them from May 1940 to the time the Vichy government was set up?

If this were Norway, his name would be Quisling. Not sure who the French version was.


27 posted on 11/27/2017 4:52:44 PM PST by Bartholomew Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bartholomew Roberts

The French Quisling was Marshal Petain.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/marshal-petain-becomes-premier-of-occupied-france


28 posted on 11/27/2017 4:59:45 PM PST by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour

Baloney, typical pro England propaganda. The bottom line is the British fled the battlefield leaving the northern French point completely exposed. Notice how the British surrender’s are always classified as a brilliant tactical decisions?. As for Singapore being indefensible can anyone imagine a Japanese force surrendering to a British force 1/3 their size?

France simply suffered a military defeat that was inescapable. Britain would’ve suffered exactly the same outcome if not for the channel. And the collaboration would’ve been about the same, based upon the behavior of numerous British aristocracy members, including royalty.

It’s just as legitimate to call the Brits tea drinking surrender monkeys as it ever is to slander of the French. The fact is it’s kind of childish to point out surrenders in the face of absolute defeat and destruction as some kind of moral failing. Numerous Union and Confederate soldiers, nazi soldiers, US forces on Bataan, Brits, Russians and many others have surrendered when it was impossible to change the outcome.


29 posted on 11/27/2017 5:02:06 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ... we.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

The next war in Europe will be a Civil war, Euros against Muzzies. It will be very bloody not like 1492 in Spain when they somewhat peacefully were expelled.


30 posted on 11/27/2017 5:03:58 PM PST by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bartholomew Roberts

The French equivalent to Quisling was Marshal of France Philippe Petain. The Vichy Govt. was established shortly after the surrender to the Germans. The Vichy Govt. retained control over 2/3rds of France. The warships at Toulon were in French controlled territory. There was no reason for them to leave. The Senior officers of the French Navy remained loyal to the Vichy Regime.


31 posted on 11/27/2017 5:12:29 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

Maybe after the RAF was destroyed too.


32 posted on 11/27/2017 6:42:23 PM PST by JerryBlackwell (some animals are more equal than others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Riley
The terms of the armistice with Germany required the Vichy government to keep the French fleet's fuel tanks empty. Although the French navy nevertheless accumulated small covert shipboard stock fuel stocks, the fleet's range was limited. They could not have made a direct cruise to Britain but might have been able to reach Gibraltar or a British base in North Africa.

Unfortunately, this possibility was foreclosed because French sentiment at the time remained agitated by the July 1940 British naval attack on French naval vessels in port at Mers-el-Kébir in Algeria. Some 1,297 French servicemen were killed, a French battleship was sunk, and five other ships damaged.

This surprise attack was controversial because Britain and France had been allies and were not at war. The result was bitterness toward Britain by many in the French Navy. This is said to have killed tentative covert plans to put the French fleet in British hands. With that in mind, the scuttling of the French fleet was the best that could be expected.

33 posted on 11/27/2017 8:14:01 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; pax_et_bonum; decimon; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; ...
Bravo to the French sailors for scuttling those craft, to keep them out of German hands. Capturing those vessels would have been far cheaper than having to build a fleet, a feat the Third Reich never managed (not surface vessels anyway). In 1940, Churchill had taken the measure of sinking another French fleet in port in Algeria. Thanks Bull Snipe.

34 posted on 11/28/2017 6:23:02 AM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Very well said, although the British surrender of Singapore was an embarrassment and that was said at the time as well. France had suffered much worse in the first WW, since so much of the western front fighting was on French soil, and they were outmaneuvered, outclassed, and just lacked a basic will to fight during the closing days of that four week German offensive. Had Hitler not lost his nerve (as he so often did, and generally right at the worst time) and had German forces close the bag at Dunkirk, the entire outcome would have been, shall we say, quite different. The North Africa campaign would have gone differently, and ended much sooner, and to Germany's benefit, that's just for starters.

35 posted on 11/28/2017 6:40:22 AM PST by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe

The Germans salvaged heavy guns from one of the scuttled French battleships and installed them onshore near Toulon harbor.

My father remembers watching the USS Nevada fire broadsides in a duel with these German guns.


36 posted on 11/28/2017 6:53:47 AM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
The French fought bravely in many instances

Following the German surrender, General Devers, commander of the 6th Army Group, began a letter to General Lattre de Tassigny, commander of the French First Army, by writing "We have fought together these past months, often against the Germans..."

37 posted on 11/28/2017 6:54:32 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnyBoy
UK forces screwed the pooch there. Japanese troops went overland without supplies to attack the city in the rear. However, it shouldn’t have worked. The Japanese force was a 1/4 the UK force and the city was heavily fortified. All they had to do was put a minor resistance and the Japanese army would have had to withdraw. But as typical in WW2 UK commanders were awful and turned what should have been an easy victory into a defeat.

Exactly. By the time the Japanese reached Singapore their army was in bad shape, exhausted, hungry and sick. There is a wierd myth that the Japanese were natural jungle fighters but this is completely untrue.

38 posted on 11/28/2017 6:59:16 AM PST by jalisco555 ("In a Time of Universal Deceit Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Historically the French since the defeat of Napoleon I have suffered primarily from poor leadership both politically & militarily (and poor equipment!). Individually from the mid/junior officer to common soldier the French have shown great bravery and in WWI crazy bravery. To label the French as surrender monkeys is historically inaccurate.


39 posted on 11/28/2017 7:02:06 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe

France has a naval history.


40 posted on 11/28/2017 8:01:10 AM PST by ZULU (DITCH MITCH!!! DUMP RYAN!! DROP DEAD MCCAIN!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson