Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIGO detects another black hole crash
Science Magazine ^ | 6/15/16 | Adrian Cho

Posted on 06/15/2016 12:43:57 PM PDT by LibWhacker

black holes

On 26 December 2015, LIGO detected gravitational waves from two black holes spiraling together.

LIGO/T. Pyle

LIGO detects another black hole crash

By Adrian ChoJun. 15, 2016 , 1:15 PM

The biggest discovery in science this year--the observation of ripples in space-time called gravitational waves--was no fluke. For a second time, physicists working with the two massive detectors in the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) have detected a pulse of such waves, the LIGO team reported on 15 June at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in San Diego, California. Once again the waves emanated from the merger of two black holes, the ultraintense gravitational fields left behind when massive stars collapse into infinitesimal points. The new observation suggests that after fine-tuning, LIGO will spot dozens or even hundreds of the otherwise undetectable events each year.

"It's very reassuring," says Gabriela González, a physicist at Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, and chair of the 1000-member LIGO Scientific Collaboration. "You need another one to be completely convinced and this is it." Cole Miller, an astrophysicist at the University of Maryland, College Park, who is not a member of the collaboration, says that the new find shows that LIGO "is genuinely a new window on the universe." Astrophysicists' catalog of stellar-mass black holes, he says, "is going to be overwhelmingly increased by LIGO."

The new observation came at 3:38.53 Coordinated Universal Time on 26 December 2015--late on Christmas day at LIGO's detectors in Livingston, Louisiana, and Hanford, Washington. As in the first event, the detectors sensed an oscillating stretching of space-time, the signal, according to Einstein's 
general theory of relativity, of massive objects in violent motion. Computer modeling indicated that its source was two black holes spiraling together about 1.4 billion light-years away. (LIGO researchers had seen a weaker signal on 12 October 2015 that may be a third black hole merger.)

The first signal LIGO spied, recorded in September 2015 and unveiled to the world in February (Science, 12 February, p. 645), emanated from surprisingly heavy black holes, with masses 36 and 29 times that of the sun. It lasted only 0.2 seconds, and physicists glimpsed only the last 10 cycles of the black holes' spiraling motion before their collision. The December 2015 sighting involved smaller black holes, 14 and 7.5 times as heavy as the sun. Physicists witnessed 55 cycles of the death spiral, a full second.

The first observation remains a riddle. Those two black holes were twice as massive as the relatively nearby stellar-mass black holes identified from the x-rays emitted by hot gas swirling into them. Astrophysicists don't know how such jumbo black holes formed. The black holes in the new event "are much more garden variety," says 
Sebastian Heinz, an astrophysicist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Nevertheless, the latest event yields new insights. For example, physicists determined that one of the black holes was spinning frenetically, at roughly 20% of the maximum spin rate allowed by general relativity. And because the new event includes many more cycles, it tests predictions of general relativity somewhat more stringently than the first event, González says. (Einstein's theory passes the test.)

LIGO

The gravitational waves that LIGO has detected originated in the southern sky. The purple and yellow lines define the likely signal source regions.

LIGO/Axel Mellinger

Most important, the second observation shows that going forward, LIGO should reap a vast harvest of black hole mergers. Rebuilt from 2010 to 2015, the new LIGO detectors have not yet reached their design sensitivity. If they do, they should see as many as one black hole merger per day, estimates Stephen Fairhurst, a gravitational-wave astrophysicist and LIGO team member at Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. The resulting sample should lay bare the mysterious evolution of black hole binaries, he says, showing whether they start out as pairs of stars that turn into black holes or as black holes that form independently and ultimately find each other.

Reaching the design sensitivity--a factor of 2.5 better than today's--is a challenge, as the instruments currently suffer from a "mystery noise" at low frequencies. David Reitze, LIGO's executive director at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, says he's cautiously optimistic that physicists can eliminate the noise and reach design sensitivity by 2019. "I won't say with 100% confidence that we will get there, but I won't say that we won't either," he says.

Physicists hope LIGO will eventually detect waves from other kinds of cosmic collisions. Mergers involving neutron stars, for example, would plumb the mysterious physics of these objects, which are essentially gigantic atomic nuclei with masses between 1.5 and three times that of the sun. LIGO physicists are combing their data for such signals, but finding them is a long shot at the present sensitivity, González says.

LIGO's next big splash will likely come in 2017. The detectors, now restarting after tune-ups, are expected to begin a second data run this fall. They should also be joined by the revamped VIRGO detector, an interferometer near Pisa, Italy, that will help pinpoint sources in the sky and measure their distances. LIGO may well have more surprises in store, Heinz says: "There's always that great possibility of finding 
something unexpected."


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: backholescollide; blackhole; detected; gravitational; gw150914; gw151226; ligo; stringtheory; waves
The new observation suggests that after fine-tuning, LIGO will spot dozens or even hundreds of the otherwise undetectable events each year.

Can't wait 'til we see our first super massive black hole merger!

1 posted on 06/15/2016 12:43:57 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

2 posted on 06/15/2016 12:45:23 PM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I guess it was coincidence that the first detection was right when they turned on the upgraded detector (actually a few hours before). Based on that, I was expecting many more observations.


3 posted on 06/15/2016 12:57:07 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Will it be able to detect when the several black holes that are national debts combine to form one massive black hole of a world depression?


4 posted on 06/15/2016 12:59:40 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Reaching the design sensitivity—a factor of 2.5 better than today’s—is a challenge, as the instruments currently suffer from a “mystery noise” at low frequencies.

...

Wouldn’t it be something if that “noise” is actually telling us something fundamental about gravity and isn’t noise at all? The CMB was discovered that way.


5 posted on 06/15/2016 12:59:50 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
as the instruments currently suffer from a "mystery noise"

One of the most hateful things in electronics engineering ...

6 posted on 06/15/2016 12:59:57 PM PDT by NorthMountain (A plague o' both your houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"...1.4 billion light-years away."

!!!

7 posted on 06/15/2016 1:00:47 PM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Can't wait 'til we see our first super massive black hole merger!

Eeeeww!

Oh wait, you said "super massive" not "massive chips-on- shoulders, lie-telling pinko-commie, run-of-the-mill leftist" black holes.

My mistake.

8 posted on 06/15/2016 1:02:03 PM PDT by 7MMmag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

9 posted on 06/15/2016 1:26:38 PM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knarf

10 posted on 06/15/2016 1:31:57 PM PDT by NorthMountain (A plague o' both your houses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: brytlea; cripplecreek; decimon; disndat; KoRn; Grammy; steelyourfaith; Mmogamer; dayglored; ...
Extra to APoD. I was expecting to post the new APoD early in the day, but they had a teaser screen, with this graphic, and the information that they'd release the real one after a 1:30 pm press conference. What drama queens.
GW151226: A Second Confirmed Source of Gravitational Radiation

GW151226: A Second Confirmed Source of Gravitational Radiation

11 posted on 06/15/2016 1:45:53 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
Thanks LibWhacker.

· String Theory Ping List ·
It is not rape-rape.
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


12 posted on 06/15/2016 1:46:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Uranus!


13 posted on 06/15/2016 2:30:33 PM PDT by webheart (We are all pretty much living in a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
Pretty amazing, isn't it? That was the merger of two black holes each having a mass between 30 and 40 solar masses. With our first crude LIGO "telescope!" I know they're surprised at how large the black holes were. But it was really small potatoes as mergers go. In short order, I imagine we'll be able to observe every significant merger in the universe, including all the supermassive ones, as long as the crashing waves announcing the merger haven't already reached us, and as long as we have LIGOs up and running. And there's no need to point our LIGO scopes directly at the action in order to catch it. Can't imagine what kind of interesting stuff they're going to find.
14 posted on 06/15/2016 2:59:04 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: webheart

15 posted on 06/15/2016 3:04:20 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Wouldn’t it be something if that “noise” is actually telling us something fundamental about gravity and isn’t noise at all? The CMB was discovered that way.
++++
Indeed. My reaction as well.


16 posted on 06/15/2016 4:41:26 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Still a Cruz Fan but voting for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson