Posted on 03/09/2016 6:34:57 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
Everyone assumed it would be the threat (or the reality) of international terrorism that would ultimately break Europes resolve when it came to goodwill towards Mid-East refugees.
Indeed, we remember vividly when the first reports of a Kalashnikov assault on cafes in the French capital hit social media on that fateful Friday in November.
Thats it, we assumed, for Europes experiment with an open-door migrant policy.
In spite of the violence and in spite of the chaos that ensued (manhunts across France, lockdowns in Molenbeek, a shootout in Saint-Deni) Europe largely kept its arms open to refugees from Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq. The Paris attacks, Europeans seemed to reason, were more indicative of why people were fleeing to Europe, than they were a precursor of what refugees would ultimately import to the bloc.
But sentiment soured in January.
A wave of sexual assaults allegedly perpetrated by men of Arab and North African origin caused Europe to cast aspersions. No longer were these victims fleeing the type of carnage that tragically befell Paris in November, they were suddenly transplants from a barbarous culture whose attitude towards women was outdated by hundreds of years.
Is that reputation justified?
Who knows.
Frankly that would require an academic study of rapes and sexual assaults across the bloc before and after the mass migration, and control variables would need to be introduced for the nationality (or at least the likely suspected race) of the attackers. Were reasonably sure someone is working on just that type of analysis at this very moment, but until robust, objective, quantitative results are available, the following interactive map will have to do. Explore it for yourself using Googles legend and tools.
My guess is that since the government is not protecting the people and the police are unwilling to protect them, vigilantism will rise up to do what needs to be done.
Direct link to Google Map: https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=z12D0zt-V4iI.kXGfjpzjOS1Q
Stop them here NOW. No Trojan horse moslems. This is a Christian nation— NOT EVANGELICAL!!! I am offended unless to call me by my Saviors name. “evangelicals represent less than 15% of Christianity- GTS!!I am not “evangelical”!! They believe in “born Again” and the word of Gog in the Greek DOES NOT SAY that. It says “Born from above”. This translational hijacking in a lie, in the name of God!! CALL ME A CHRISTIAN FOR TRUMP!!! I am not an “EVANGELICAL”. they don’t want the name of God Jesus in what they call us. STOP THIS AS OFFENSIVE!!
A stunning visual perspective.
I thought Sweden had some of the worst attacks. Don’t see any there.
Take a close look, as this is the way the USA will look once the Dems and the Bush-types get their way.
German trees will soon bear strange fruit.
“word of Gog in the Greek DOES NOT SAY that. It says Born from above.
Nicodemus understood Christ as saying “born again” and he was there.
That said, your rant is interesting, but on the wrong thread.
Ping
Are you talking about Ted “Bush?”
Sweden?
Ping
How’s that invasion working out for you, Germany?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.