Posted on 02/02/2016 11:29:52 AM PST by conservativejoy
Let's get back to basics here and wake up from fever dreams.
Ted Cruz won Iowa and did it impressively. The final turnout was 186,289, of which Cruz received 27.72 percent, or 51,646 votes. If the turnout had been lower, say 135,000, a number that Decision Desk founder Brandon Finnigan was more comfortable with, Cruz would have had over 30 percent of the vote.
In any case, Iowa Republicans smashed their 2012 caucus attendance record to smithereens, besting it by 64,000 voters. The models and polls (including the vaunted Ann Selzer) all showed Trump winning big in that scenario. In fact, Cruz beat Trump by 6,238 votes, and most of the undecideds who showed up in the cities Trump needed to carry broke for Rubio instead.
But Cruz dominated. He won 56 of 99 counties: Nearly 57 percent. He finished second behind Rubio in Polk (Des Moines), where Trump didn't do nearly as well as he needed to.
Even more basic: Cruz has never lost an election of any kind. He won his Senate primary in Texas; he won the general election in Texas, both against significant and well-funded opposition.
Now Cruz faces another well-funded, establishment-backed candidate-two if you include Rubio-but I'm referring to Trump.
Donald Trump has never won an election of any kind* (at least a public election). Those who now tout the fact that Reagan lost Iowa before winning the nomination in 1980 need to face the fact that Reagan was a seasoned campaigner. He had run for office since 1966 (that's 14 years for the math-challenged), winning the nomination for governor with over 64 percent of the vote, and beating incumbent Democrat Pat Brown by a million votes in the general election.
Reagan ran for president, as a Republican, never as a third party, three times before he won the office. Whoever is thinking Donald Trump is another Ronald Reagan is delusional.
And now Ted Cruz is a winner, and Donald Trump is the thing he hates most in the entire universe: a loser. Until just about an hour ago, the last tweet on Trump's Twitter timeline is over 12 hours old. It's dead silence from The Donald. Undoubtedly, Trump expected this loss could happen, and he's prepared for it. But you're never really prepared to accept a loss (believe me, I've worked enough losing campaigns).
From this point on, we know two important things. Ted Cruz can win, and a media-fueled demagogue is not unstoppable. Now that we know the boogeyman is not hiding under the bed, let's go forward without all the fear and nail biting, and take America back for conservatives.
*Wikipedia notes that Trump won two Reform Party primaries in 2000. I dispute this. The Reform Party wasn't organized enough to run primaries, and in any case, Trump withdrew early after the party started to disintegrate.
As a Californian, Donald reminds me far more of Arnold than Ronald.
Duck and cover...
Cruz is no Reagan either. He is about the worst speaker ever after Hillary. I can’t listen to him. He will be killed in a general
Hey, Gov! Keep the Faith! :):)
In before the brawl between the Trumpets and Cruzers begins.
It’s going to be a long road to August...
> Iowa Republicans smashed their 2012 caucus attendance record to smithereens, besting it by 64,000 voters
Many of them Rubio Democrats?
polls show him consistently beating Hilary.
Always. :)
The mailer, the Carson allegations, the religious zealotry & finally the lie on immigration are going to make it real hard to hold my nose and vote for this guy.
Hopefully, the Cruz & Trump camps will go back to their policy of detente— holding their fire on one another and firing at the RINOs (most particularly the despicable LIAR Marco Rubio with his AMNESTY & OPEN BORDERS mindset). That is THE way that one of them will win, IMHO. Otherwise, they run an extremely high risk of handing the nomination to Schubio/Rubio. I fear a scenario of Trump and Cruz lowering their own votes because of a Trump-Cruz internecine war allowing Rubio to pick up the majority of the delegates, particularly when we get to the winner-take-all states such as Florida.
Cruz leaves Iowa with a one delegate lead = Cruz is the new Reganz!
Yeah, ok.
Yes he did. Trump is following Reagan pretty well. I think it is so ridiculous that the media is crying over a 2nd place for Trump. Big deal. It was Cruz’s to lose. For God’s sake Trump should have had 2 percent in Iowa.
“Ted Cruz won Iowa and did it impressively. The final turnout was 186,289, of which Cruz received 27.72 percent, or 51,646 votes. If the turnout had been lower, say 135,000, a number that Decision Desk founder Brandon Finnigan was more comfortable with, Cruz would have had over 30 percent of the vote. “
Huh? That’s nonsense.
Yes, if 51,000 and change who did not vote for Cruz had stayed home, he’d be at 38%. But then if the 51,000 and change who did vote for Cruz had stayed home, he’d be at 0.
Yup....
Correct observation! It is about time. Trump spent the least and received the most for it. That should open the eyes of conservatives and first timers. 19 tril in debt and we are bickering over junk.
I loved Ronnie but this go around we need a head ripper. We are circling the drain.
What is scary is NOBODY gets over 50 percent. What the heck is up with that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.