One Senator Says That The 1st Amendment Does Not Apply To Individuals, And Does Not Stop There

DailyHeadlines.net ^ | 07July15 | Belle

[samtheman]

The NEA has done its job well.

[smoothsailing]

[Vendome]

Are religious institutions comprised of people?

[Vigilanteman]

Isn’t Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) a rug muncher? That would explain the origin of this belief.

[null and void]

Bookmark

[CSM]

Tyrants seem to congregate at MSNBC.

[Robert Teesdale]

It is a silly distraction to discuss the sexual preference of this legislator.

A sitting United States Senator has declared the First Amendment null and void. It's not a casual off the cuff comment; this was a deliberate advancement of enemy forces. Make no mistake. It was a prepared, well-thought out statement and the cultural swells that emanate will be very carefully observed, for more active calibration of the narrative ahead.

The collectivists absolutely want you silenced, disarmed and dead.

Don't amuse them with your own stupidity in the process.

It's not about whether she likes girls or boys. It's about her liking their boots on your neck.

Stop worrying about what is or isn't between her legs or in her mouth.

Worry about the pistol being held to the back of your neck.

[LouAvul]

Another rat liar. Why is this news?

[cva66snipe]

Ron White is right. You can’t fix stupid.

[RatRipper]

Cruz and Trump need to jump on this hard. This kind of thinking is what they are running against and most voters do not understand that to be the case.

[KGeorge]

No. The First Amendment reads, as follows, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or **or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech**, or of the press; or the right of **the people** peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.’’ (** emphasis mine)
Period.

The left is completely, utterly out of control. If our “representatives” (spit) in Congress continue to abdicate their obligations & refuse to abide by their oaths,
then it’s up to the people (that is each one of us) to see that the Constitution- as written, is followed.

That is our first mistake. Our second great mistake is all of these lawsuits to the SCOTUS because it places these issues in their power (& at that point, solely theirs) to do whatever they damn well please. We have a corruption problem in all 3 branches of government. There is no rule of law in America anymore.

[SharpRightTurn]

And I thought Patty Murray was supposed to be the dumbest person in the Senate.

[KGeorge]

I agree.

[I want the USA back]

Just packing peanuts between the ears.

[Robert Teesdale]

Rule .303 amid systemic collapse. But that is merely an observation, based on history.

[ForYourChildren]

The undesirables must be identified and removed. They stink and are a blot on our progressive society. But, let’s do it legally. Then in the name of law, we can mark them, shut down their businesses, force them out of work, pack them up and ship them off to the camps so we don’t have to see them, and where work will set them free.

They don’t exist. What happens to them in the camps is irrelevant; as long as our progressive brave new world does not have to see them or acknowledge their existence or non-existence.

[Flick Lives]

You know what is sickening. No Republican politician will make a political issue out of this. But when the shoe is on the other foot, Democrat politicians milk idiotic and not so idiotic statements from Republican politicians for all they are worth.

Of course it would help if we had a free and curious press and not the type that can be literally, and I mean literally, led around on a leash by the Democrats.

"Heel! Good girl!"

[DuncanWaring]

[Thunder90]

Baldwin also thinks that the Second Amendment does not exist.

[ctdonath2]

What, you’re going to give up just like that?