Posted on 02/01/2015 1:29:42 PM PST by ReformationFan
C.S. Lewis wrote in 1952 that perversions of the sex instinct are numerous, hard to cure, and frightful.
The good Oxford don did not live to see the times we now live in, times in which progressive extremists can state a straight face that actually there are no sexual perversions times in which even the long-held taboos against pedophilia and incest are falling like dominoes.
The evidence that in the name of absolute sexual freedom, traditional taboos are no longer to be honored is everywhere. While sexual perversion has always existed, it has never been as widely tolerated and even promoted as it is today.
Examples abound too many to cite.
But there is the case of the teenage girl who has decided to marry her dad and move to New Jersey, where incest, she stated, is legal.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
only a matter of time until the Dem Party openly touts the right of people to have sex with their kids and the GOPe saying “we don’t like it but...”
Yes he would.
Sexual perversion today is rampant.
To be honest and fair, I have looked at women with lust in my heart, that Christ warned against. But I cannot fathom the depths of perversion that plague our society today. Homosexuality has its own special breed of wickedness that is DIRECTLY from Satan.
Corrupt federal politicians exploit low-information voters, voters who have never been taught the federal governments constitutionally limited powers, winning votes from such citizens by promising them sexual / marital rights based on constitutionally nonexistent federal government powers.
I have read a post from liberaltarians saying that why should the Govt have an age of consent and incest laws.
The left have always been infatuated with their sexual perversions, from cross dressing to homosexuality etc
Sicko’s the lot of them.
And with Sharia law coming and all, how soon before goats become a major legal issue.
On FR - about governments other than the federal (which neither does nor has no Constitutional authority to enact age of consent and incest laws)?
I suspect that if the state legislatures still uniquely controlled the Senate as the Founding States had intended that it would be more difficult for corrupt federal politicians to promise voters sexual freedom-related laws to win votes. So this kind of federal government corruption is arguably more evidence that state lawmakers were foolish to ratify the ill-conceived 17th Amendment.
yep and we will hear the usual slogans of No Govt should tell us what to do in our bedrooms bla bla.
if it were up to the communists, socialists and liberaltarians then they would want to have sex and orgies in front of schools for the kids to see.
That is how sick they are.
The difference is that yours (and mine) are natural lusts. Man naturally looks at women and find them sexually attractive. Women naturally look at men and find them sexually attractive.
Homoseuality is a step beyond beyond because it’s an un-natural lust. It rejects the natural and is that much more wicked.
“Sexual Freedom” to a lib means being able to force people to have sex with you or at the very least choke down all their perversions as “normal and acceptable” in ALL social situations....
Free Love and Sexual Freedom is a conspiracy of men against women.
Sickos.
bump
Kinsey
Sex may be free, but it never comes without a cost.
I’ve never heard a libertarian say any such thing, but you mileage apparently varies.
The retrogrades want everybody to act worse than barnyard animals. At least barnyard animals know male from female.
Exactly. And to replace the church and the family with the state.
“Each citizen would then be completely independent of all his fellow man, and absolutely dependent on the state.”- Jean Jacques Rousseau
That Prager article is quite good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.