Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists discover how to turn light into matter after 80-year quest
Physics ^ | 5/18/2014

Posted on 05/19/2014 3:08:29 AM PDT by markomalley

Imperial College London physicists have discovered how to create matter from light - a feat thought impossible when the idea was first theorised 80 years ago.

In just one day over several cups of coffee in a tiny office in Imperial's Blackett Physics Laboratory, three physicists worked out a relatively simple way to physically prove a first devised by scientists Breit and Wheeler in 1934.

Breit and Wheeler suggested that it should be possible to turn into matter by smashing together only two particles of light (photons), to create an electron and a positron – the simplest method of turning light into matter ever predicted. The calculation was found to be theoretically sound but Breit and Wheeler said that they never expected anybody to physically demonstrate their prediction. It has never been observed in the laboratory and past experiments to test it have required the addition of massive high-energy particles.

The new research, published in Nature Photonics, shows for the first time how Breit and Wheeler's theory could be proven in practice. This 'photon-photon collider', which would convert light directly into matter using technology that is already available, would be a new type of high-energy physics experiment. This experiment would recreate a process that was important in the first 100 seconds of the universe and that is also seen in gamma ray bursts, which are the biggest explosions in the universe and one of physics' greatest unsolved mysteries.

The scientists had been investigating unrelated problems in fusion energy when they realised what they were working on could be applied to the Breit-Wheeler theory. The breakthrough was achieved in collaboration with a fellow theoretical physicist from the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, who happened to be visiting Imperial.

Demonstrating the Breit-Wheeler theory would provide the final jigsaw piece of a physics puzzle which describes the simplest ways in which light and matter interact (see image in notes to editors). The six other pieces in that puzzle, including Dirac's 1930 theory on the annihilation of electrons and positrons and Einstein's 1905 theory on the photoelectric effect, are all associated with Nobel Prize-winning research (see image).

Professor Steve Rose from the Department of Physics at Imperial College London said: "Despite all physicists accepting the theory to be true, when Breit and Wheeler first proposed the theory, they said that they never expected it be shown in the laboratory. Today, nearly 80 years later, we prove them wrong. What was so surprising to us was the discovery of how we can create matter directly from light using the technology that we have today in the UK. As we are theorists we are now talking to others who can use our ideas to undertake this landmark experiment."

The collider experiment that the scientists have proposed involves two key steps. First, the scientists would use an extremely powerful high-intensity laser to speed up electrons to just below the speed of light. They would then fire these electrons into a slab of gold to create a beam of photons a billion times more energetic than visible light.

The next stage of the experiment involves a tiny gold can called a hohlraum (German for 'empty room'). Scientists would fire a high-energy laser at the inner surface of this gold can, to create a thermal radiation field, generating light similar to the light emitted by stars.

They would then direct the photon beam from the first stage of the experiment through the centre of the can, causing the photons from the two sources to collide and form electrons and positrons. It would then be possible to detect the formation of the electrons and positrons when they exited the can.

Lead researcher Oliver Pike who is currently completing his PhD in plasma physics, said: "Although the theory is conceptually simple, it has been very difficult to verify experimentally. We were able to develop the idea for the collider very quickly, but the experimental design we propose can be carried out with relative ease and with existing technology. Within a few hours of looking for applications of hohlraums outside their traditional role in research, we were astonished to find they provided the perfect conditions for creating a photon collider. The race to carry out and complete the experiment is on!"


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: doctormccoy; light; matter; physics; stringtheory; transporter

1 posted on 05/19/2014 3:08:29 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’m going to try this in my bathroom before work this am. Will let you know how much energy I produce.


2 posted on 05/19/2014 3:16:39 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

“I’m going to try this in my bathroom before work this am. Will let you know how much energy I produce.”

Yeah, the last moron that tried this experiment setup a chain reaction through all of the photons in his universe, imploded it, and created the Big Bang explosion that resulted in a new universe populated by some ceatures describing themselves as humans. Do you really want to risk that again?


3 posted on 05/19/2014 3:27:12 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

By passing your golden stream into the can?


4 posted on 05/19/2014 3:29:43 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

At this point what does it matter?


5 posted on 05/19/2014 3:33:28 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

hehehee


6 posted on 05/19/2014 3:35:48 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Funniest people in the universe on FR.


7 posted on 05/19/2014 3:36:13 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: saganite
By passing your golden stream into the can?

This weekend I turned Coors Light - which comes from streams in Golden, CO - into the matter of a golden stream.

In doing so, I believe I did not violate the law of conservation of matter. However, while doing so, I engaged in many conservations that didn't matter.

8 posted on 05/19/2014 3:42:17 AM PDT by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
On a serious note, these guys just proposed a theoretical experiment and claim this "proposal" proves the theory the "proposed" experiment is designed to prove.

"Despite all physicists accepting the theory to be true, when Breit and Wheeler first proposed the theory, they said that they never expected it be shown in the laboratory. Today, nearly 80 years later, we prove them wrong. What was so surprising to us was the discovery of how we can create matter directly from light using the technology that we have today in the UK. As we are theorists we are now talking to others who can use our ideas to undertake this landmark experiment."

All this based on some scribbled equations on the back of a napkin at some nondescript coffee shop. How can anyone take science seriously when these types of claims are published?

9 posted on 05/19/2014 4:02:22 AM PDT by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun
"How can anyone take science seriously when these types of claims are published?"

I agree, except I would speculate that the error is with the reporter, not with the scientists. What they have is a "Proposed Experiment", not a "Discovery".

It's sort of like Archimedes, with his shouts of "Eureka!", while running naked through the streets of Syracuse, after "discovering" how to measure volume of an object while entering his bath tub. His theory ultimately proved correct, but his timing was premature.

10 posted on 05/19/2014 4:15:15 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age didn’t end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

The science is settled. The debate is over.


11 posted on 05/19/2014 4:29:08 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Please excuse the potholes in this tagline. Social programs have to take priority in our funding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Bttt


12 posted on 05/19/2014 4:30:25 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (In America, we don't do pin pricks. But sometimes we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Another dumb article with a lying headline.
They have not “discovered” how to create matter from light.

They have come up with a theory. They plan to do an experiment.

My prediction: they will try an experiment. They will announce to the world that they have created matter from light, and the papers will all start crowing about “finding out the secrets of the universe.”

6 months later a small article in a learned science journal will inform us that the conclusion is unwarranted. There will be nothing in the papers.


13 posted on 05/19/2014 4:37:55 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Oh great. Now I have to wash the bugs off of my windshield and the matter deposited by oncoming headlights.


14 posted on 05/19/2014 4:58:34 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

I give you a triple A+ for creativity for coming up with this one!

Kudos!


15 posted on 05/19/2014 5:40:40 AM PDT by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

I caught that, too.

Science holds far too many theories as fact when they have never been proven. Jumping to conclusions will eventually lead you so far from the truth that you will cease to recognize it.

But boring old truth doesn’t get you research grants like sexy theories that require lots of gold and high-powered lasers to test.


16 posted on 05/19/2014 6:01:55 AM PDT by EricT. (Everything not forbidden is compulsory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Misleading headline.


17 posted on 05/19/2014 6:34:00 AM PDT by Bigg Red (1 Pt 1: As he who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in every aspect of your conduct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The Last Question by Isaac Asimov
http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html


18 posted on 05/19/2014 6:37:23 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun
All this based on some scribbled equations on the back of a napkin at some nondescript coffee shop. How can anyone take science seriously when these types of claims are published?

When the President of the United States stands in front of Cameras and proclaims climate Change/Globull Warming as settled science based on politics and huge donations from Green Business interests I can understand why others make wild assed claims after doodling on a napkin.

19 posted on 05/19/2014 6:39:39 AM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VRWCarea51
How can anyone take science seriously when these types of claims are published?

Not seeing much cereal here.

20 posted on 05/19/2014 7:26:44 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

Yup. These guys did not perform an experiment that proved this. They proposed a method for performing an experiment that would do so.

IOW, Sheldon and Leonard, the theoretical physicists, have come up with an idea. They need to get Howard onto it to make it actually work.

Assuming he can tear himself away from the robotic arm.


21 posted on 05/19/2014 11:14:26 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Don’t these scientists know the science is settled? Once the debate is over there is no need to ever continue testing theories. Consensus you know.


22 posted on 05/19/2014 11:33:28 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

“I’m going to try this in my bathroom before work this am. Will let you know how much energy I produce.”
*******************************************************************

If you succeed, could you bottle up the positrons for me? I have no problem rounding up electrons, but have a criticle shortage of positrons—the little devils keep escaping.


23 posted on 05/19/2014 11:36:53 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; ...
Thanks markomalley. Next up, Heisenberg Compensators.


· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·

24 posted on 05/19/2014 5:35:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

All this based on some scribbled equations on the back of a napkin at some nondescript coffee shop. How can anyone take science seriously when these types of claims are published?
+++++++++
Thanks for posting. My thoughts from your fingertips.


25 posted on 05/19/2014 6:58:32 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson