Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum’s movie ‘The Christmas Candle’ flops
Salon ^ | 11/26/2013 | ELIAS ISQUITH

Posted on 12/01/2013 7:44:28 PM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: leapfrog0202

You are right.

It’s from Santorum’s company, just like the people who directed and produced movies like Courageous, October Baby went basically through an independent movie company.

We have movies from Warner Brothers, doesn’t mean Warner Brothers wrote it but sure, had a big part in creating, director, producing it.


21 posted on 12/01/2013 8:11:09 PM PST by BeadCounter (Scott Walker: "Unintimidated")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Panned by the usual People Against Goodness And Normalcy.


22 posted on 12/01/2013 8:11:55 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Do you also say Warner Brothers didn’t create certain movies either?


23 posted on 12/01/2013 8:12:12 PM PST by BeadCounter (Scott Walker: "Unintimidated")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Salon has paid a “journalist” to do a hate/hit piece on Rick Santorum....

The clearing house/stat sheet web site for movies that I consult is boxofficemojo.com

So I went there...in the opening weekend of the movie, it was only showing on five screens. Hey, it is the studio’s first release, it is admittedly and obviously a low budget, no-star film....and it was #37 for the weekend. By the way, it’s “per screen” gross was $13,000...which was higher than the #1 movie for the weekend, Thor.

So the next weekend, The Christmas Candle added several screens to its showing: about 387 additional movie screens ran the flick.

The additional screens naturally lowered its “per screen” gross, but it also made it the MOST IMPROVED gross amount from the previous week...an astounding increase of over 1,000% from week one to week two. And it went from #37 in weekend one to #15.

Keep in mind, this is with minimal to zero publicity or attention from the media.

Who is to say it is a flop? Does this “journalist” know how to read box office charts? Does this “journalist” know the production budget? With its gross of $918,000 or so, perhaps the film even turned a profit. If turning a profit is the measure of a success, according to boxofficemojo.com, THOR has yet to break even.

Same with “Delivery Man”, “The Counselor” and “Illysium”, all that got big media attention.

Nope, this Salon piece is just another chunk of evidence that the mainstream media and the “professionals” who populate it despise classical Christian entertainment, and they ESPECIALLY hate it if a Christian man is in charge of a business.


24 posted on 12/01/2013 8:13:05 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Rick’s decision to criticize Cruz didn’t help.


25 posted on 12/01/2013 8:14:26 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leapfrog0202

Not a big Santorum fan, but am willing to give the guy a big break. He is a total noob at this, didn’t produce it and was only made CEO of the distribution company in July...


26 posted on 12/01/2013 8:14:52 PM PST by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

You are exactly right.

I bet the same site has given glorious reviews for other low-budget films that made even less on more screens.


27 posted on 12/01/2013 8:15:06 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

The review is from the one of the 2 more leftwing obama ass-kissing newssites aside from Pulitico so coming from Salon it didn’t surprise me.


28 posted on 12/01/2013 8:15:57 PM PST by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

BTW- What in the world is the “Book Thief” about?


29 posted on 12/01/2013 8:17:06 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Oh, I know. Doesn’t surprise me one bit.


30 posted on 12/01/2013 8:17:42 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Great vid by ShorelineMike! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOZjJk6nbD4&feature=plcp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This guy will do anything for a buck
Provide legal representation for pro wrestlers, run for POTUS on Romney’s money mans dime, now hes a movie executive!

He apparently sucks at everything he tries, otherwise he’d still be in the Senate


31 posted on 12/01/2013 8:18:25 PM PST by Rome2000 (THE WASHINGTONIANS AND UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE ARE THE ENEMY -ROTATE THE CAPITAL AMONGST THE STATES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

and the media loves the anti-Catholic film “Philomena”

BTW- Why did someone remake “Old Boy”? Did they think the Korean original wasn’t good enough? :p

The media also LOVES the pro-pedophile French movie “Blue is the Warmest Color” which is lower than Christmas Candle and has been out for more than a month and a half.


32 posted on 12/01/2013 8:20:50 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler
Fandango doesn't list it in the Flash roller that shows on the front page, but there are many ads for Black Nativity.

It is showing at three theaters in DFW today.

And I must say, for a film that has not been heavily advertised, is competing against Hunger Games and Frozen, and is NOT in 3D (resulting in lower ticket prices), I think that the film did OK.

33 posted on 12/01/2013 8:21:15 PM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

So was “It’s A Wonderful Life.”


34 posted on 12/01/2013 8:23:02 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BeadCounter
It depends on the time period. In the 30/40’s, Warners was an active production company, with writers/directors/actors on staff. Warner had creative control of its films from that era.

These days, it's not uncommon for a studio to just have a distribution deal where it circulates and sells the film through its system in return for a piece of the revenue. Without knowing how the deal was structured, it's not really possible to tell the degree of creative control (if any) a distributor had.

35 posted on 12/01/2013 8:33:09 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

One of our family members had a private screening of this movie and said it was very good.


36 posted on 12/01/2013 8:36:18 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not enough homosexual pedophiles in the screenplay, undoubtedly...


37 posted on 12/01/2013 8:41:07 PM PST by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
bringing in a pathetic $2,500 per screen.

$2,500 isn't really pathetic for non-mainstream movie.

38 posted on 12/01/2013 8:44:05 PM PST by mykroar (“We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again.” - Nathanael Greene)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erlayman

Not a big Santorum fan, but am willing to give the guy a big break. He is a total noob at this, didn’t produce it and was only made CEO of the distribution company in July...


I agree with you. Hubby came home from work the other day and said he’d heard Santorum on Hannity’s show discussing it. Asked me if I’d heard of the movie and I had, but the synopsis I read didn’t make me want to go see it.


39 posted on 12/01/2013 8:51:25 PM PST by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

They’re showing it on 2 screens here in Albuquerque. 1 is a Cinemark theater with 16 screens and one is the Premiere Theater (small theater group that just opened one here in Rio Rancho - smaller community that abuts Abq).

I was surprised with a limited release we had 2 screens here.


40 posted on 12/01/2013 8:53:38 PM PST by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson