Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seizures of illegal pot from Colorado up 400 percent
The Daily Caller ^ | 8/2/2013 | Greg Campbell

Posted on 08/05/2013 8:55:53 AM PDT by rktman

Marijuana is being smuggled out of Colorado in record amounts, according to a new report by a multi-agency drug task force, citing a 400 percent increase in pot seizures since 2005 from the state that has become something of an American Amsterdam.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: coloradoh; cultureofcorruption; doh; drugcrime; federallaw; potlaws; trafficking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: JRandomFreeper

Let’s not start with Pot. Okay, can we agree that would be foolish?


21 posted on 08/05/2013 10:31:20 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: greene66
A more preferable war on drugs would involve local vigilance committees who shoot the dope-peddling bastards on sight.

Would you go after the most widely-used & abused drug - alcohol - first?

22 posted on 08/05/2013 10:37:47 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
Government over-reach is government over-reach. Regulation of education, agriculture, drugs, etc... are not part of the federal powers. The government needs to quit trying to control everything that it currently unconstitutionally controls.

/johnny

23 posted on 08/05/2013 10:38:34 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: drunknsage

Let’s see if those guys are recalled before you assume Colorado are staunch libertarians. I lived in Denver for 4 years and it’s a cesspool of low info voters and hardcore libs.

“I thought Republicans and Conservatives were against the nanny state, or is the party simply full of hypocrites? I guess you love freedom until you dont”

We are for liberty and against the nanny state. Legalizing pot while leaving the nanny state intact is stupid. Thinking that legalizing pot will somehow usher in universal emancipation from big government requires huge leaps in logic. My brain, fully fixed on reality, isn’t agile enough to make those leaps.


24 posted on 08/05/2013 10:38:51 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Fine. I’m for putting the feds in place. Let’s not start with pot. I would be willing to bet that the majority of legalize pot crowd wouldn’t side with you on many other issues. Once they got their pot legalized, they’d shut you out of the conversation. Society would continue to decay, we’d have more people on disability/welfare, and voters would get even stupider. Do yo disagree with that?


25 posted on 08/05/2013 10:43:03 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
I don't care which comes first. All of them need to go.

It doesn't matter if I think drugs are evil and make people stupid, the federal government doesn't have the constitutional power to regulate them.

I'll take any victory for restoring constitutional government, even if it means getting rid of some laws that I personally like.

To do anything else would make me a hypocrite.

/johnny

26 posted on 08/05/2013 10:46:39 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“We just smiled and waved/Sittin’ on that sack of seeds.”


27 posted on 08/05/2013 10:47:28 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Partial legality keeps a black market.

Note that this is not south of the border cartel weed. There are more pot shops than Starbucks in Denver. The choice is legally grown drugs sold on the free market or cartel drugs sold on the black market.

28 posted on 08/05/2013 11:13:24 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rktman
What the pro-pot legalization Libertarians in the crowd here don't seem to appreciate is that while it was legal in the past, we didn't have the near complete moral and intellectual degeneracy that we have now. This is the issue that John Adams touched upon when he said, "...we have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other"

Once the people untether themselves from an external moral code (God) and abdicate their responsibility for self-control, they essentially become ungovernable under our system of self-government and can therefore no longer be trusted to make wise decisions. This is why the breakdown of society inevitably leads to dictatorship.

Permitting such people to have unfettered access to mind-altering drugs (something that earlier, more mature generations handled without trouble) will only accelerate the current societal decline. Unfortunately, a large portion of the "American people" of today simply aren't mature enough to handle it.

We as conservatives can't on the one hand say (rightly) that the liberal parasites are a danger to the country, but on the other hand think that making it easier for them to obtain psychoactive drugs will somehow lead to Libertarian nirvana. I understand the principle, but in today's world I am afraid that some restrictions are necessary.

29 posted on 08/05/2013 11:19:49 AM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noiseman
but in today's world I am afraid that some restrictions are necessary.

Then change the constitution to give the power of regulation of education, agriculture, drugs, etc... to the federal government.

/johnny

30 posted on 08/05/2013 11:22:47 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Well, would you rather have your state importing marijuana from Colorado, or from Mexico? People are going to get it from somewhere, one way or the other.


31 posted on 08/05/2013 11:24:31 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

“America can’t survive legalization of pot. Stupidity, laziness, and apostasy are at an all time high.”

America has no plan to fight stupidity, laziness, or apostacy, even if we don’t legalize marijuana. So marijuana is just a red herring in that argument.


32 posted on 08/05/2013 11:27:37 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
So marijuana is just a red herring

of course it is, the legalizers goal is to NORMALIZE the use of any and all drugs for ANY AGE... and then they'll move on to normalizing any and all sex acts at ANY age

33 posted on 08/05/2013 11:30:34 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Someone smuggles drugs from me-he-co? WHAT? LOL!


34 posted on 08/05/2013 11:34:52 AM PDT by rktman (Inergalactic background checks? King hussein you're first up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
"Then change the constitution to give the power of regulation of education, agriculture, drugs, etc... to the federal government."

I agree with you that the federal government has no real constitutional authority over these areas, but we weren't really arguing Federalism. You would agree, would you not, that the states DO have these powers, if they so choose? Yet I would guess that Libertarians would argue against that authority as well.

I am a small government conservative, but that does not mean that I am in favor of anarchy. If men were angels (or imagined to be, as Libertarians seem to view them) they would have no need of government at all. But they are not.

There are many difficult questions like this in today's world. Though I've argued one side of this issue thus far, I am actually sympathetic to both views. The difficulty we face is how to restrain an increasingly out of control segment of society without unduly restricting the liberty of the remnant of responsible citizens. Unfortunately, I think John Adams nailed it. Once enough of the people turn from God and from reliance on His principles, the Constitution loses its power to govern them.

35 posted on 08/05/2013 11:45:24 AM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Yes, yes, we already know you think every who is against the drug war is a gay pedophile with poor hygiene, but thanks for stopping by.


36 posted on 08/05/2013 11:46:31 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: noiseman
how to restrain an increasingly out of control segment of society

The original out of control segment of society was the federal government that created so many of the problems that you allude to. The feds must be restrained to work within the Constitution. Many of the problems will go away when that happens.

The Constitution leaves police powers to the states. That should include selling raw milk or not, firearms regulations, drugs, etc...

The government isn't the solution. It's the problem.

/johnny

37 posted on 08/05/2013 11:49:45 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rktman

With so many illegals moving into Colorado, it is unreasonable to expect them not to use their job and business skills. They are sharing their culture with us, and there are obviously millions, about 100 million Americans, who want to share with them.


38 posted on 08/05/2013 11:50:40 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

The problem with “Everyone I know who does drugs sucks and either can’t figure out how to vote or votes stupidly.” is that you run into people all day long who use drugs like marijuana and you have no idea they do so if they don’t tell you.


39 posted on 08/05/2013 12:02:57 PM PDT by arbitrary.squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

“If every druggie overdosed and died tomorrow, I’d be quite happy.”

What about people who smoke weed, which for all intents and purposes, has no toxic dose to the human body? I can go to the liquor store and buy enough vodka to kill myself by nightfall, but it’s simply not possible to do that with marijuana.


40 posted on 08/05/2013 12:04:48 PM PDT by arbitrary.squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson