Posted on 11/06/2012 10:27:31 PM PST by Trueblackman
Seems like many Republicans here want to blame Gary Johnson or something else for Mitt Romney losing the Presidency, but in reality it is the Party Establishment especially Karl Rove that are to blame for the reelection of Barrack Obama!
You see it was Karl Rove and the Republican Establishment that made sure no true Conservative ever had a chance for the nomination and actually believe that Conservatives would buy the lie that a Liberal Northeastern Republican remotely had a chance against an sitting Marxist.
This did not work in 2008 as well as 2012 and you will see them now push Jeb Bush as the party's next savior in 2016.
That had nothing to do with it.
Problem is that the takers finally outnumbered the creators.
Romney actually ran a good campaign, but the 47 percent worked really hard to take away what was not theirs.
Sadly, we are lost and this nation is gone. Now, it’s just to join them or leave them.
Romney was a complete train wreak and wimp like McCain, he lost under these conditions and offer very little in place of the current mess.
The Rover Model has lost twice now, no need for a third time!
No, the country is moving more toward the left.
Notice that the unemployment level was only so low because there are fewer and fewer people working overall. This has been the trend for decades.
Democracy inevitably leads to communism. People find that they can appear generous by declaring their willingness to give other people’s money to the poor. Other people of course find that they can get this free stuff and have 100% free time for whatever recreational purpose they have while benefits never decrease.
In addition the constitution has been replaced by precedent. Judges no longer look at the constitution they look at precedent instead. And that includes even the silliest of precedents that came from a court that was intentionally packed to rubber stamp Roosevelts socialism in the new deal. So there is no barrier to this slide to communism though he founders intended the difficulty of amendment to make the constitution a barrier to evil. Any new precedent can be created at any time to replace any part of the constitution. All they have to do is connect some phrase in the constitution by any number of “this affects that somehow” links to whatever they want, and then suddenly the constitution favors their new law and it is binding precedent.
The only way to reverse this is to convince people of the truth. Once that is done the politicians and even the judges themselves will become more conservative. Also the media will become a little more conservative.
If you’re response is “they are just too dumb” or “they don’t listen to reason” then we are probably doomed to lose.
But no. Romney had the entire right wing extremely excited. He had massive Obama-like rallies. Anyone else would have to be better at communication, not just more conservative. And the more conservative they are the better they have to be at communication until you make conservatism the default belief before the election.
This is a pessimistic view but if you don’t see the problem you can’t fix it. And this is the problem: we are on the path to socialism not because we didn’t get a conservative through the primary but because people are finding out that its more rewarding and a hell of a lot less risky to get stuff for free than be vilified for being successful.
No. We lost because the dems have more voters. Get over this bs about mitt and bush. Our problem is, exactly what the founding fathers warned us about.
I am afraid to say, but the answer is, there is no answer
Most people, who went to those rallies and thought afterwards about Romney’s past record of working with Democrats and moving the party to the Left, we the party got what is deserved another Presidential for the Rove model.
And you allow a Soros funded Venezualian company to count the votes.
A flaw of the moderate candidates is that they tend to want to be Mister Nice Guy. One of Romney’s biggest errors was not driving that nail in on Libya in the third debate. He had a golden opportunity in front of the American people, the same people who weren’t going to hear about it from the MSM, and he blew it.
Bttt
Bttt
Of course remember the he is a nice guy campaign by Romney?
And which more conservative candidate that couldn’t win the Primary was going to win the general election
The majority who voted for Obama didn’t give a hoot about Libya.
They like Obama personally, like the goodies he gives them, and believe he is slowly fixing Bush’s bad economy because Clinton and Powell told them so.
They don’t investigate the truth, they follow mainstream news and pop culture. Obama is cool and cares. The rich white guy was gonna tie up their uteruses and put dark people in chains.
Zero is just one of several anti-Christ figures throughout our land and the world, at large....
This what we get for having too many primary debates and having the lib media orchestrate that circus designed to eliminate all the candidates one by one, except their choice. And Mitt Romney was that choice to run against Bathhouse Barry. The GOP blindly stepped right into a liberal media trap. Like most FReepers, Romney was my absolute last choice for the nomination, well maybe tied with Ron Paul. I voted against Barry, not for the flip flopping big government nominee.
Learn to TAKE (from the government and liberal entities) - Bleed them dry (Fast and Furious)
In the mean time - Take care of your own needs everyday and always insure that you don’t pay taxes by making coop agreements with like minded fighters. Help people like yourself who can circumvent government at every turn. The key here is to drain the looters and feed the producers.
Turn your home and the homes of your friends into “Galt’s Gultch”.
Let the government pay and pay and pay to the leaches and hangers on until they fail and the system collapses. (The faster the better). Let the leaches of society suffer for awhile. Let them RELEARN what it means to work to survive. Then come back and offer them work under your terms where fair minded men rule (without taxation and regulations up the wazu) and good work receives good pay and great work gets greater pay.
The quicker this happens the more infrastructure will remain viable. If this drags out the looters will only destroy or let rot the assets you will need to rebuild once they are destroyed.
Give people a fair wage for their work and no pay for bad work. Once they start to starve they will learn to work more honestly and only then will they understand that good reliable work gets respect as well as good rewards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.