Conservative Talk Show Host Need To Go, For Birther Issue To Become Mainstream

[OUTKAST]

I've come to realize that most conservative talk show hold the key to making the birth issue explode. After listening how Hannity tried to change the subject numerous time with Trump. It is apparent that these 'gatekeepers' are controlled.

Glenn Beck to Rush Limbaugh all are apart of the 'pecking order' that is against American Citizen fighting for truth. I am a black man and I can see this clearly. I didn't vote for Obama cause in the streets, we can see when someone is running game. I knew from the start Obama was a hustler controlled by someone.

There needs to be a house cleaning all around and as long as nobody is willing to put their life on the line for it like in the past, it will only get worse.

[Responsibility2nd]

You are correct. But not just for the birther issues alone.

I can list a whole host of reasons why I’m disillusioned with Beck, Rush, and all the other talking heads.

But just like I could care less what these paid entertainers think - no one cares what I think either.

[Bearshouse]

This does seem to be the most blatant scandal of my lifetime and NO one, from journalist to judges will touch it, and I can’t understand it. The truth will out some day, and these people who facilitated this crime will be scrambling for cover. Why would you put yourself, your career and your legacy in that positon? I just don’t get it.

[brooklyn dave]

I am not thoroughly cconvinced he was born in Hawaii. If he was — just produce the docs Barry H. and it will all go away and you’ll make the accusers look a a-holes. But NO, he gives us this possibly fraudulent copy of something or other and everything is supposed to be OK. B. H. Obama has certainly been a manchurian president. Forget where he may have been born —what about th rest of his life (excluding what he says in his 2 books) I think I know more about the inner workings of the Blessed Trinity (being sarcastic) than I know about the real life of Barack Obama. The conservative pundits have agreed with thee left (for all practical purposes —that the birther isssue is too fringy and they don’t want to get their hands dirty with it).But many Americans still have it in the back of their minds —was this guy really born in the US? It’s not going to go away like some drag queen snapping her fingers three times.

[brooklyn dave]

POWER IMMEDIATE POWER

[Jaidyn]

Most of the so-called conservative talking heads stop short when it comes to Obama. They put their careers before the truth, just like the liberals do.

[Perdogg]

I think the problem with your theory is that it is “just a theory”.

No one has provided any definitive proof of what Corsi, Arapaio, or Trump is claiming is correct.

First it was the birth certificate, then it was de Vattel, now it is Frank Marshall Davis who was 0bama’s Father, or as one person claim, Jimi Hendrix was 0bama's father.

The problem with all of these theories is that they keep changing like the JFK assassination theory in order to fit elements of a previous theory that have been rejected or disproven.

[Ronin]

Whatever it is, it is big enough for Obama to stand in front of the American people and release a blatantly forged birth certificate to hide. That, in itself, proves he is utterly unfit for any office, let alone the Presidency.

All the way back to Watergate, the cry was “It’s not the crime, it’s the coverup.”

What is Obama covering? Anything that is bad enough to justify the lengths to which they have gone to keep it hidden must, by definition, be so devastating that the Obama regime would not survive if it became known — which is precisely why it MUST become known.

Truth will out, eventually. We just have to keep poking.

[glennaro]

Agreed.

Although I understand the position of some conservatives who say we have a better opportunity for victory by focusing on Obama's record, it bothers me a great deal that otherwise respectable self-promoted "conservative talk show hosts" and "constitutional scholars" not only won't even talk about this, they (specifically, Hugh Hewitt and Michael Medved) characterize anyone who questions Obama's eligibility for the office as "coo-coo", "nut-cases" or "lunatics". I conclude that to some folks, defending the Constitution depends on whether or not it would be disruptive or inconvenient to them. Cowards all.

[Perdogg]

The problem with the birther theory is that one minute 0bama was born in Kenya and now we are being told by the same person that his father might be Frank Marshall Davis, which is it?

[Calm_Cool_and_Elected]

And I think Rush has been pretty vocal about what O believes and what he is doing to this country. He stated several times this week that “Obama hates this country”. The election is right around the corner whereas getting this corrupt Congress to take any action ....heck they can’t even get a budget through.

[DiogenesLamp]

The problem with the birther theory is that one minute 0bama was born in Kenya and now we are being told by the same person that his father might be Frank Marshall Davis, which is it?

The two things are not mutually exclusive. There is normally a nine month delay between birth and conception. Plenty of time for Stanley Ann to get to anywhere in the world.

I personally don't believe she went to Kenya. Unless better evidence shows up, I regard that Idea as simply implausible. Canada perhaps, but Kenya? No.

[glennaro]

I don't know. I do know there are a lot of theories, not all of which conflict. And I also know that the question of Obama's eligibility (and much of his background) is shrouded in mystery, is inconsistent, and is built on half-truths and outright lies ... all in the context of a significant -- perhaps the most important -- Constitutional requirement: That is, does the sitting president of the United States of America possess the qualifications to hold the office?

I'm not surprised that people in positions of influence or power are reluctant to touch this ... to take the chance that a fraud of far-reaching consequence may be uncovered and that they would go down in history as the one who caused the first "black" president to be removed from office. I mean, it would require supreme courage to take this on -- something seldom encountered in the elite political circles in Washington, D.C. And though I am surprised of the level of discouragement and vitriole toward those who want to investigate these inconsistences and to discover the truth by certain influential "conservatives" who cover their eyes and ears to avoid the growing evidence of fraud and deceit, I am astounded at their lack of even a modicum of curiousity about it. That is truly amazing to me.

[Perdogg]

Don't get me wrong, O is a fraud. I believe he should be exposed as such, but there has to be proof not speculation.

However, common sense would tell everyone that most of these conspiracy theories don't really hold water.

For example, if Frank Marshal Davis is Obama’s father, then regardless of what Davis and Dunham did, Obama would be naturally born.

If Obama was born then in Hawaii, yes, I am saying it again, then regardless of who his father was he would be naturally born.

If Frank Davis was his father then people would be embarrassed they were hoaxed, and yes, probably would not vote for him, but it would not change any of the results.

Let's say he was born in Kenya and he was not Naturally born, which I think is unlikely, it would not make any difference per SCOTUS, even if he were to be impeached and removed. Kagan and the wise Latina would still be Associated Justices and 0bamacare would still be the law.

Let's do expose the truth, but we cannot put all of our eggs into this basket and when we do discovered the truth and don't like it, move off it.

[Wurlitzer]

Look, even though it can be easily proven by anyone familiar with Adobe Illustrator that the BC was not only a fake but a real pi$$ poor fake, the koolaid drinkers will continue to use Saul Alinsky tactics to dispute anything we say.

There is something with real meat that I have tried to get the FOX crew to go after with no luck.

FACT: 100% irrefutable by even lying liberals is both the Obamas were FORCED to surrender their law licenses. While the MSM (mainly socialist maggots) refuse to use a single one of the investigative reporters sent to dig up dirt on Sarah Palin, to look into this there has to be one patriot left in the USA who knows exactly what happened and why Obama has done everything possible to hide the reason.

Strange some democrat scum was able to get his opponent’s sealed divorce documents opened when the Kenyan ran for the Senate (Kenyan based completely on their own campaign material).

If I were running the Romney campaign, I would, every time I was confronted with the tax return question would instruct everyone to respond with: “If we are to go down the road of asking for more documents than are required by law, how about the Obamas unsealing the reason they were forced to surrender their law licenses.”

I swear the GOP could not debate their way out of a wet paper bag and stay in defensive mode everything the communist party tries to see what dirt will stick to one of their own. They need to turn it right back at the enemy within and demand answers to this and Obama’s college records and how he paid for it.

[Logical me]

I didn't vote for Obama cause in the streets, we can see when someone is running game.

I spotted this snake oil salesman almost from the first time I saw him on TV.

[OUTKAST]

BUMP

[Grand]

The real problem lies not in theories but in the sealed documents that allow natural curiosity to expand. Do you care whose hands are on our national “football” tonight?

[Perdogg]

refer to my post #14