Posted on 12/12/2010 12:09:40 PM PST by 2harddrive
In the interest of Freedom of Speech, and equality of opportunity: Here is a link to pictures and information on the two women who have accused the notorious Julian Assange of rape, in two cases of voluntary intercourse spaced a day apart, because he used a "condominium" that broke, or in another case, did not use one at all. He has most definitely embarrassed the US government, although he is not an American. Do you feel the US put these women up to such weak charges, to get him hauled in? And judging from their appearances, are they guilty, or innocent?
http://www.inmalafide.com/2010/12/08/anna-ardin-sofia-wilens-contact-information-and-addresses/
http://www.inmalafide.com/2010/12/08/anna-ardin-sofia-wilens-contact-information-and-addresses/
What prompted you to post this purile crap?
“judging from their appearances, are they guilty, or innocent?”
how is this useful?
A condominium might be suitable to house Assange’s ego. The other member? Pfah!
Anna is innocent....
The other? Not looking too good
You mean, are they "doable"?
Remember, these are European women, and radical feminists. IOW, it's impossible to tell based on photos that fail to show their armpits.
If I answer no to the first question and yes to the second, do I get hit with a denial-of-service attack?
Hope it doesn't’ get wound up any tighter in here, sheesh.
I wonder how much these women are getting paid, and by whom, to make their accusations. The liberals are desperate to stop Assange. He must have something pretty damaging on Obama. Or maybe it’s Hillary. Better not mess with Hillary or you’ll be found dead on a park bench.
I suppose it’s possible just that his leaks have not supported the ideology of the liberal cause, but that seems like it might require George Soros’ involvement. He’s the only one who could pull off this coordinated attack on Assange if the only reason was to protect the liberal establishment from embarrassment.
Good point, I recant my not guilty verdict pending presentation of said evidence.
I saw two Father’s Princesses soiled by an accused pervert.
Yikes....a little levity is out the door today.
Why should the accusers be granted anonymity?
After knowing who they slept with? No way!
Another thread accused Obama himself of having engineered the diplomatic leaking, which damaged Hillary.
So who cares about these bit players?
A comment at the link:
“...MeMyselfI says:
December 8, 2010 at 6:46 pm
Let’s see… the CIA release a mis-mash of unimportant government documents to some low level computer nerd – just to see what happens.
They then track all of the people that touch the stuff and start a database.
But, things get out of hand a bit and this stuff makes it to someone that has the ability to *really* publish world-wide. Uh-oh.
But, this tool turns out to be useful, and as a matter of fact, they’ve got someone working him…
When they’re done with him he’s going down… and so will EVERY. SINGLE. WEBSITE. that tried to help him in ANY way whatsoever.
This will be the first show of control over the internet by the FCC. You know, national security was compromised, so something HAD to be done, right?
I’d be careful if I were you. They’re trying to smoke all of you out before they cut you off....”
I think we are being play too. This whole mess stinks to high heavens. How did a low level PFC have access to so much data? Why weren’t there restrictions on who and how info could be downloaded? That is basic security 101. Why would the Feds wait so long to get even mildly interested? Something is rotten in Denmark!
Given Assange’s popularity with the violent European left, these woman might want to take a long, and annonymous, vacation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.