Posted on 11/05/2010 12:44:33 PM PDT by mojito
Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin. By Timothy Snyder. Basic Books; 524 pages.
IN THE middle of the 20th century Europes two totalitarian empires, Nazi Germany and Stalins Soviet Union, killed 14m non-combatants, in peacetime and in war. The who, why, when, where and how of these mass murders is the subject of a gripping and comprehensive new book by Timothy Snyder of Yale University.
The term coined in the books title encapsulates the thesis. The bloodlands are the stretch of territory from the Baltic to the Black Sea where Europes most murderous regimes did their most murderous work. The bloodlands were caught between two fiendish projects: Adolf Hitlers ideas of racial supremacy and eastern expansion, and the Soviet Unions desire to remake society according to the communist template. That meant shooting, starving and gassing those who didnt fit in. Just as Stalin blamed the peasants for the failure of collectivisation, Hitler blamed the Jews for his military failures in the east. As Mr Snyder argues, Hitler and Stalin thus shared a certain politics of tyranny: they brought about catastrophes, blamed the enemy of their choice, and then used the death of millions to make the case that their policies were necessary or desirable. Each of them had a transformative Utopia, a group to be blamed when its realisation proved impossible, and then a policy of mass murder that could be proclaimed as a kind of ersatz victory.
(Excerpt) Read more at economist.com ...
I'm looking forward to reading the entire thing, if one can look forward to a reading up on such a grim subject.
If you wish to read a gripping historical thriller on this theme, try Dark Star by Alan Furst.
On my list after I read this review.
Thanks for the recommendation!
Hitler and Stalin had much in common. Both had alcholic fathers who beat them senseless. Both had religious mothers who tried to protect them. Both encouraged their sons to enter the priesthood. Too bad neither one followed their mother’s advice. Millions of lives would have been spared.
bflr
From the book:
“As Stalin interpreted the disaster of collectivization in the last weeks of 1932, he achieved a new height of ideological daring. The famine in Ukraine, whose existence he had admitted earlier, when it was far less severe, was now a “fairy tale,” a slanderous rumor spread by enemies. Stalin had developed an interesting new theory: that resistance to socialism increases as its successes mount, because its foes resist with greater desperation as they contemplate their final defeat...”
My my. These rationals sound shockingly familiar.
One question is: who financed them?
One Guess
Don’t forget Treaty of Rapallo. Hitler’s gold propped up Russia’s stupid economy. Stalin’s raw materials made Hitler’s war machine possible. Which worked quite well until June 22, 1941.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Rapallo,_1922
“transformative Utopia” sounds familiar too, doesn’t it?
Has a ring to it.
I’m shocked, nay! I’m stuned!
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.