Posted on 03/21/2010 8:02:21 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Dr. Richard North of the EU Referendum sends word of this new revelation. North and Christopher Booker were the first to point out the money trail with Pachauri. Now the have followed the money on IPCCs Amazongate all the way to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Heres an excerpt from both.
Appearing in the Booker column is an account of how the conservation group WWF hopes to turn Amazonian trees into billions of dollars, all in the name of saving the planet. The background briefing on which Booker relied is posted below, detailing how the rainforests are to become a monstrous cash-making machine.
The Amazon a green gold-rush
The WWF and other green campaign groups talking up the destruction of the Amazon rainforests are among those who stand to make billions of dollars from the scare. This green gold-rush involves taking control of huge tracts of rainforest supposedly to stop them being chopped down, and selling carbon credits gained from carbon dioxide emissions they claim will be saved.
Backed by a $30 million grant from the World Bank, the WWF has already partnered in a pilot scheme to manage 20 million acres in Brazil. If their plans get the go-ahead in Mexico at the end of the year, the forests will be worth over $60 billion in carbon credits, paid for by consumers in rich countries through their electricity bills and in increased prices for goods and services.
The prospect of a billion-dollar windfall explains the sharp reaction to the Amazongate scandal, in which the IPCC falsely claimed that up to 40 percent of the rainforest could be at risk from even a slight drop in rainfall.
Here, the IPCC was caught out again making unsubstantiated claims based on a WWF report. But unlike the Glaciergate affair where its claim that Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035 was conceded to be an error, the IPCC stood firm on its Amazon claim, stating that the assertion was correct. What makes the difference is that there is no serious money locked into melting glaciers. Amazonian trees, however, are potentially worth billions.
In standing its ground, the IPCC was strongly supported by the WWF, and by Daniel Nepstad, a senior scientist from the US Woods Hole Research Centre. Relying on an assiduously fostered reputation as a leading expert on the effects of climate change in the Amazon rainforests, Nepstad who works closely with the WWF posted on the Centres website a personal statement endorsing the correctness of the IPCCs statement. Bizarrely, his own research failed in any way to substantiate the claim.
fyi
.
Good find. So many of these organizations are as evil evil can get. Always goes back to amassing huge fortunes regardless of how they are obtained.
...followed the money on IPCC's "Amazongate" all the way to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).Thanks Ernest!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.