Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My disappointment in Hugh Hewitt (he criticized calls for Jeb to stand up to Greer and save Terri)
churchillbuff/hughhewitt ^ | March 26, 05 | Churchillbuff

Posted on 03/26/2005 7:38:18 AM PST by churchillbuff

Hugh's been strong in defense of Terri -- till yesterday, when he devoted a lot of time denouncing those (like Dr. James Kennedy) who have called for Jeb to step forward - despite Judge Greer's injunctions - and take action to save Terri Schiavo from a judicially-decreed death.

Hugh was going on about the "rule of law" and quoting the old chestnut from "Man for All Seasons," about how if we tear down the laws to get at the devil, we have nothing to defend ourselves when he turns on us.

But Hugh doesn't get it: IT's the ACTIVIST JUDGES who've ALREADY TORN DOWN THE LAWS. For some politician to stand up to a lawless judiciary would be a stand FOR the "rule of law," not against it.

We have a crisis of governance in this country, with judges taking seizing tyrannical power. Tthey're able to act as tyrants only because elected officials won't stand up to them. IF THERE WAS EVER AN OCCASION THAT WOULD PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO TURN THE TIDE - FOR AN ELECTED OFFICIAL TO SAY "NUTS" TO A DICTATORIAL JUDICIARY - IT IS NOW, WHEN THE TINPOINT JUDGE GREER, A HICK COUNTY JUDGE SWOLLEN WITH ARROGANCE HAS ORDERED AN INNOCENT WOMAN KILLED SIMPLY BECAUSE SHE'S dISABLED.

There are constitutional and statutory provisions enough for Jeb to rely on, as chief executive authority of Florida, to act to save this woman.

Hugh Hewitt, with all his civics lecturing -- taking the issue away from the life or death realities of this crisis -- forgot to mention some important historical precedents: Lincoln refused to obey the Dredd Scott (pro slavery decision); Andrew JAckson scoffed at what he considered an illegal order of Chief Justice John Marshall; Thomas Jefferson affirmed that EACH BRANCH of government has an independent DUTY to interpret and UPHOLD the constitution;;; and DWIGHT EISENHOWER SENT TROOPS TO CLINTON'S ARKANSAS (clinton was a kidk, of course)., when local politicians AND LOCAL JUDGES WERE IMPOSING SEGREGATIONIST LAWS, DENYING BLACKS THEIR RIGHTS TO EQUAL PROTECTION - i.e TO GO TO UNIVERSITY.

The showdown with arrogant judiciary has to happen at some point: Destiny has asked Jeb to be the hero for free government, and to take a stand. Hugh Hewitt counsels passivity: Let's hope Jeb finds the counsels of conscience to be louder and more persuasive!

Terri is bleeding by the tongue. Jeb Bush, Hugh Hewitt and the rest of should say "NO MORE!" to Mr. Greer, the judicial mediocrity who has ordered that torture.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: anitwartrollvanity; chamberlainspeaks; cretin; hewitt; hysteric; judicialtyranny; moron; notnews; quislingforterri; schiavo; stupidvanity; terri; terrihysteria; terripalooza; terrischiavo; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

1 posted on 03/26/2005 7:38:18 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

The Governor of Florida allowed his office and leadership be usurped by a judge. He will never recover his credibility. He has displayed himself to be of feeble character. Too bad it was at Terri’s expense. When called upon to lead, he coward.

The buck stops at the Governor’s office and not with some judge.


2 posted on 03/26/2005 7:44:21 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Difficult question and to be fair, only one that Jeb Bush can answer.
I'm very upset by all this and I see the struggle with Jeb Bush fighting for Terri and I'm not about to judge him harshly now.


3 posted on 03/26/2005 7:44:29 AM PST by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Hugh is a coward. He always has been. Real men don't listen to spoiled brats.


4 posted on 03/26/2005 7:44:42 AM PST by farmer18th ("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Hugh does get it and knows activist judges are the problem. He believes that violating the law ourselvesis not the proper way to remedy the problem. The way to go is to elect the right judges, or, where they are appointed, change the balance in legislatures in order to get more conservative, strict constructionist judges on the bench.


5 posted on 03/26/2005 7:46:15 AM PST by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Hugh DOES get it. I have been appalled at the way people here have demanded that the law be ignored.


6 posted on 03/26/2005 7:47:25 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

No good deed goes unpunished.
Jeb Bush will be the new lightning rod
unless Terri rises from the dead.


7 posted on 03/26/2005 7:50:46 AM PST by b9 (WWHH whatwouldhillaryh@te)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Hewitt was right. We are a nation of laws. Surely Jeb Bush would do whatever he could do within the law. Just because liberals ignore the law when it does not work for them, does not mean that we should. If anyone knows of a law that would allow Jeb Bush to act, I suggest you call his Attorney General. If Conservatives do not stand for the rule of law, then who are we to complain when the other side doesn't either?
8 posted on 03/26/2005 7:56:46 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Many are finding it very easy to condemn and chastise Jeb Bush.

But they won't take the time to explore the WORK he has done on Terri's behalf.

Jeb Bush has been fighihg endlessly for years now, trying to effect change, through policy and intervention on this poor woman's plight.

So has Right to Life.....behind the scenes...lobbying the Florida legislators and actually getting bills passed...

..Already, in the past, Jeb Bush has been instrumental in giving this woman more time.

I am personally ashamed of those who are foaming at the mouth and wishing him ill will.

We are eating our own...

..Do you think Reno, or Bob Graham, or Lawton Chiles or Clinton's Congress or anyone of that ilk would have lifted a finger to help her.

The answer is NO!--No, they wouldn't....and NO they didn't!

PLEASE step back and see what is happeing.

The Democrats are in glee watching folks turn on Jeb Bush and by proxy, his brother, the President, because they didn't 'do enough'..(according to some people)

If you all are taking the word of Randall Terry on this.....PUUULLLLEEESS DON'T!...

Randall Terry has his own checkered past and has fallen from grace in many circles.

It just shows the desperation of Mr. Schindler to acquire the services of Terry.....I don't blame Schindler, but IMO R.Terry is taking a huge advantage of him just so Randall can get some face time.

I have great respect for D.James Kennedy, but not having read yet what he said, I still support Jeb Bush.

PLEASE FOLKS....STOP THE ASSAULT ON BUSH!

9 posted on 03/26/2005 7:59:04 AM PST by Guenevere (Sola Gratia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th
Hugh is a coward. He always has been.

Why do you say that and what facts do you base it upon?

10 posted on 03/26/2005 7:59:14 AM PST by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
We are a nation of laws."""

No, we've become a nation of judges who disregard the law -- and of wimpy politicians who won't stand up to them (and sheeple who give the wimps a pass - if they have an R after their names).

Greer is killing Terri. Jeb should do something about it. He won't, and he's counting on sheeple like you to make excuses for his inaction.

11 posted on 03/26/2005 8:00:05 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

I heard that yesterday too. Medved was a little disappointing too. He's definitely for keeping Terri alive too, but doesn't think that Michael S. is such a bad guy--just doing an evil thing in this case. He said that Michael S. took care of her after her accident. From what I gather that was all for show--to show what a loving husband he was for the mal-practice trial because didn't it all end right after he got the dough?


12 posted on 03/26/2005 8:00:32 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avital2

Do judges have the last word as to what the law and constitution are ---for the Governor-- in his capacity as executive?


13 posted on 03/26/2005 8:00:50 AM PST by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
We are a nation of laws.

__________________________

Yes, but are we a nation of Judges too? Does the executive have no role in enforcing the law--or is he only an instrument of the Judiciary? What is the answer???

14 posted on 03/26/2005 8:03:05 AM PST by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Hugh's arrogance about the law is appalling. To hear the legal mumbo jumbo that passes for the "rule of law" after reading the clear intent of the founding fathers is something everywhere present today. About the only courage Hugh has is to say we need to get better judges on the bench a process that will save a few people from being killed like Terri in about 50 years. Judicial corruption and tyranny has run amok for 40 years and old Hugh is still in the "who will decide if we don't let criminal judges decide mode" when push comes to shove. We are a nation of the attorneys, by the attorneys and definitely for the attorneys. CASE CLOSED... Terri will die and you could be next under "the rule of law(yers)"


15 posted on 03/26/2005 8:04:17 AM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
HH is a squish, a "go along to get along" process conservative.

He would have defended the "rule of law" in Germany in 1935, as doctors were euthanizing the "useless feeders," because judges had approved the new laws.

16 posted on 03/26/2005 8:05:28 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
People have very strong feelings on this. Don't worry about it. He just doesn't want the pro-life crowd turning on itself. Jeb has done so much, and we really need to be grateful for what he has done. I would love it if he went to the limits, but I am not going to fault him for holding back at this point. He is in a very difficult position and he has really been outstanding overall. We must THANK him, not condemn him.

I'm not saying I really fault those who want him to do more, but I think they should realize that they will need his aid again, and that they shouldn't burn bridges. This is a tough one. Jeb has been great. We should be thanking him. This is NOT his fault.

17 posted on 03/26/2005 8:05:39 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ontos-on
Yes, they do have the final word. The governor is still exploring all avenues trying to find a way to do this without destroying the very fabric of this country.

Think about it, if we allow the law to be destroyed just in this one instance, it will never be put back together again. The law must be obeyed or changed but never ignored.

18 posted on 03/26/2005 8:05:50 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Yep - there are too many people here blind to the slippery slope.


19 posted on 03/26/2005 8:06:21 AM PST by ErnBatavia (I don't drink and FReep...it just looks that way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ontos-on
Why do you say that and what facts do you base it upon?

I used to listen to Hugh back in the late 1980s when he took up space on a local radio station. He has always been a proceduralist, an appeaser, a hand-wringing whiner. Any mention of the exeuctive or the legislative branches testing their power against the judiciary makes him poop his pants.

Hugh Hewitt has no answer, in this blind support for the judge's version of the law, for the Tea Party, for Rosa Parks, for Cromwell. If he were advising the patriots, their children--us--would be slaves. He can't even justify the executive office taking action, much less the people.
20 posted on 03/26/2005 8:07:08 AM PST by farmer18th ("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson