[palmer]

"...to force the public into accepting one world centralization of monetary administration (the biggest and most important step in establishing global government)." versus "Far from being opposed to cryptocurrencies, global elitists have been piling into them with praise and with investment dollars."

The author is horribly confused. Cryptocurrency provides no benefits to the global elite. On the contrary they allow the Bourgeoisie a chance to exit the fiat in various hellhole countries like China. The same may become true for the US but there is certainly no capital flight from the US right now. The author seems to beleive there wlll be though, but doesn't realize that CC are one of the ways that we won't have to accept one-world government.

[mac_truck]

Cryptocurrency provides no benefits to the global elite.

That depends who remains in control of cryptocurrency and how many alternatives fall by the wayside.

Various government entities have already started trying to gain control of cryptocurrency, including some here in the United States.

NY for instance has established a Bit-license scheme that requires CC exchanges that operate in the state to turn over client data. Japan also has heavy regulation of exchanges operating there.

If paper money falls by the wayside and government controls the electronic alternatives, then its game over for folks who want to maintain economic privacy and freedom.

[Sopater]

...CC are one of the ways that we won't have to accept one-world government.

I think that you are quite mistaken on this point. If government's thought that CC's were a threat to their established monetary system, all that they would have to do is ban them.