Posted on 09/09/2017 9:21:48 AM PDT by John Semmens
Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and his campaign donor Salomon Melgen are currently on trial for political corruptionthe Senator for taking bribes and Melgren for paying them. Menendez argues that the bribes in exchange for pursuing legislation favorable to Melgren was just ordinary politicsno worse than the actions of my many peers in Congress.
As a case in point, the Senator pointed out that former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev) was able to fatten his bank account through sweetheart real estate deals with one of his donors. And he inserted language in the Affordable Care Act in exchange for money from the drug companies. He wasnt prosecuted for any of this. Why am I being singled out?
Prosecutor Peter Koski contended that Menendez went outside the bounds of traditionally acceptable pay-for-play bribery. Mr. Melgren doesnt live in New Jersey. The Senator cant pass off the favors he did as constituent services. Former Senator Reids land deals were all conducted with a Nevada resident and constituent. And the payments he received from the drug companies were in the form of campaign donations. That Senator Reid retired and can now pocket these campaign donations is irrelevant.
Kirk Ogrosky, the defense attorney for Melgen, called the distinctions between the actions of Senators Reid and Menendez artificial. Mr. Melgren may not be a constituent of Senator Menendez in a geographic sense, but he is a constituent in a shared ethnicity. Both were part of the fellowship of Hispanic Americans. This trial is not only an attack on the two defendants, it is an attack on all Hispanics.
Whether Menendez should resign from office if he is convicted posed a difficult dilemma for his Party peers. Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) pondered the issue, observing that on the one hand, a criminal conviction is not good for ones resume as a member of government. Given the fact that so many have been able to skate past the rules that would typically land a violator behind bars, a conviction in his case would signal an unusual degree of incompetence. I mean, the Clintons raked in hundreds of millions of dollars using the leverage of public office. This was a much bigger heist than Senator Menendezs petty larceny. Yet, neither of them are on trial nor likely to ever see the inside of a prison cell.
On the other hand, there is no constitutional bar to an elected representative also being a convicted felon, Schumer continued. Lets not overlook the fact that the Senator does represent the State of New Jersey. The voters there have a right to elect whoever they wish. Who is to say that he isnt the kind of person who best reflects the values and talents of that states inhabitants?
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
https://azconservative.org/2017/09/09/menendez-trial-raises-thorny-issues/
Sad that this news is being buried or drowned by Irma, the Mexian Earthquake and North Korea. UNDERLINE, and recap..this is a very important moment in the countrys history.
He’s gonna come out smelling like a rose.
Outstanding one John. I enjoy all of them.
just ordinary politicsno worse than the actions of my many peers in Congress. Does that make everything OK? Does Menendez think this is what his case should be based on? I wonder if he realizes how many of his peers should be in jail,too.
So the defense is that since others have broken the law and not been charged that this idiot should be able to break the law and not be charged.
Middle school juvenile logic at its best.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.