Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No One Cared About Hacking until We found Out How Corrupt Liberals Are
Independent Sentinal ^ | Jan 6, 2017 | S. Noble

Posted on 01/06/2017 6:43:15 AM PST by KeyLargo

No One Cared About Hacking until We found Out How Corrupt Liberals Are

By S. Noble - January 6, 2017

US major government and military organizations are hacked all the time by endless numbers of foreign and domestic actors. Nothing was done to fix our cybersecurity. But let a privates organization like the DNC get hacked or careless John Podesta’s emails get hacked and all hell breaks loose.

John Podesta left his smart phone in a cab, he fell for a phishing incident and his password was ‘passwØrd”. Hillary put our state secrets on a personal server she kept in a bathroom. She and Huma left their phones on a bed in a hotel in China. Hillary sent her emails to all sorts of people without security clearance. Her maid printed out her classified documents.

If they were so important, why didn’t the FBI bother to collect the information, the servers, the computers, the flash drives, even the drives held by the Clinton lawyers?

We are hacked routinely by Iranians, North Koreans, Chinese, Russians, possibly ISIS, Internet joyriders, among others.

Since 2009, they have attacked the US electoral grid, Pentagon’s Joint Strike Fighter Project, NASA, the Dept. of Energy, Federal Election Commisson, US postal service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin, White House, State Department, Dept of Defense, Internal Revenue Service, Office of Personnel Management.

(Excerpt) Read more at independentsentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: assange; clintons; corruption; cybersecurity; democrats; dnc; emails; fbi; govtabuse; hacking; hillary; huma; kerry; liberals; obama; password; podesta; russians; security; tyranny; whitehouse; wikileaks

Chinese hackers at work

North Koreans hack regularly.

1 posted on 01/06/2017 6:43:15 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Pretending Podesta’s e-mail are “The American Election System” is nonsense.


2 posted on 01/06/2017 6:45:25 AM PST by G Larry (Pretending Podesta's e-mail are "The American Election System" is nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Thou shalt not tell the truth about Democrats.


3 posted on 01/06/2017 6:45:41 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

“Chinese hackers at work”

Looks more like video gaming to me. =)


4 posted on 01/06/2017 6:46:35 AM PST by the_boy_who_got_lost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Pretending Podesta’s e-mail are “The American Election System” is nonsense.

Pretending Podesta wasn't involved with pedophilia or the death of Scalia is nonsense.

5 posted on 01/06/2017 6:48:20 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Democrats were not one bit concerned about foreign influence or voter fraud, as long as they thought it was helping Democrats.
Not until the Russians and other foreign and domestic cheaters *failed* to get Hillary elected, did Russian influence become an issue. A Fake issue.

As far as I'm concerned, Russia has tried to influence America since 1917, if not earlier.
They succeeded. 0bama would not be in office otherwise.

6 posted on 01/06/2017 6:54:11 AM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

7 posted on 01/06/2017 6:55:03 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

Senator offers a defense of Trump

“Perhaps the closest to a defense of Mr. Trump came from Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas. Noting “imprecise language” stating that Russia “hacked the election,” Mr. Cotton referred to Mr. Clapper’s Oct. 7 statement on the matter and pressed him to be more specific about the agencies’ findings.

Mr. Cotton also suggested that the conventional wisdom that Mr. Putin favored Mr. Trump over Hillary Clinton might be wrong. Mr. Trump promised a stronger military and more American oil and gas production — policies Mr. Cotton suggested would not be to Russia’s advantage.”

Via: NY Slimes


8 posted on 01/06/2017 7:02:36 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
To find out who rules you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize (expose).--Voltaire
9 posted on 01/06/2017 7:07:45 AM PST by oldbrowser (Obama begat Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
How did the nasty DNC treatment of Bernie benefit Russia? Did Russia convince the DNC to tank Bernie in the primaries? Is Debbie Wasserman Schultz a mole for Russian? Is Donna Brazile a Russion plant? Is THAT Russia's 'undo influence' on the 2016 elections?

What involvement did Russia have in the election of the most Marxist President the US has ever had, who offered Russia "more flexibility" in his second term, who had his incompetent SoS "hit the reset button" for better relations with Russia, and has acted like a pussy regarding Russian geo-political and military misadventures?

Did Russia arrange for the security sieve, known as "Hillary's Home Brew Server", to intentionally leak State secrets to WikiLeaks and other hackers?

Does Clapper have hard evidence that WikiLeaks derived data (which thus far is roundly indisputable) from the DNC server or Hillary's Home Brew Server directly from Russian state actors?

Does Russia support a strengthening of US military power, as promised by the PEOTUS, which somehow benefits Russia?

How does Mr. Clapper define "fake news"? Did Hillary's declaration of "landing under sniper fire", or "a video cause the Benghazi attack", Donna Brazile's smuggling of debate questions to Hillary, or the release of Podesta's racially-charged emails constitute Russian-driven fake news?

Can Mr. Clapper conceive of a "leak" from DNC insiders at all?

If the FBI was denied access to the DNC servers to investigate for evidence of Russian hacking, what physical evidence is present that is so egregious that at least one addle-brained, atherosclerotic, senior Senator emphatically claims the "Russian hack" was an Act of War?

While we are investigating undue influence on elections (whether it is hacking, leaking, or propaganda) who is looking into US dollars funding the plans to influence Israeli elections, and the efforts to blunt the BREXIT elections in the UK, and threats to "put Britain in the back of the queue" for trade?

10 posted on 01/06/2017 7:09:52 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

John McAfee Talks About ‘Russian Hack’

One of the most brilliant cyber-security experts has come forward to give his thoughts on the supposed Russian hack of the U.S. election.

Cybersecurity LEGEND McAfee: ‘Russian Hack’ Is NOT TRUE! (Video)

Ryan Saavedra Jan 6th, 2017 8:20 am 24 Comments
johnmcafee
John McAfee Talks About ‘Russian Hack’

One of the most brilliant cyber-security experts has come forward to give his thoughts on the supposed Russian hack of the U.S. election.

From RT:

The sloppiness of the alleged DNC hack by itself proves it was not organized by a nation state, and the “utter nonsense” presented as proof of Moscow’s involvement is rather evidence of intelligence agencies being “ignorant and naïve,” John McAfee told RT.

The so-called evidence of the Russian involvement in the hacks not only looks like “the most deceptive propaganda was perpetrated on the American public” but actually proves quite the opposite, McAfee believes…

Thus, McAfee believes, the whole “Russian hacking” narrative is either “propaganda intended to incite the American people, to anger toward Russia for some reason, or our intelligence community is so ignorant and naïve that they should all be replaced.”

Cybersecurity specialist believes that based on the presented evidence the hack “cannot possibly be an organized nation-state.”

“The hack on the DNC used a piece of malware a year and a half old and there have been many updates since then, McAfee said. “This was done by an independent one person kid that downloaded the software. Please, this is not an organized hack and certainly not a nation-state that did this.”

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01/cybersecurity-legend-mcafee-russian-hack-not-true-video/


11 posted on 01/06/2017 7:09:57 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

The Russian hacking story is the Biggest Big Lie the LIEberals an come up with on such short notice. Remember, they weren’t prepared for election defeat. It took them completely surprise and they had to come up with a Big Lie on short notice... and they quickly found the Russians!


12 posted on 01/06/2017 7:13:08 AM PST by samtheman (I voted for Trump without Russian help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Assange's said something profound in his interview with Hannity. He stated that governements do NOT want transparency, as they do not what to show how truly incompetent and crooked they really are.

That statement summarizes the whole issue...

13 posted on 01/06/2017 7:13:35 AM PST by Dubh_Ghlase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Yep - totally ignoring the fact that if there hadn’t been so damn much corruption, there wouldn’t have been angulation to discover/report...


14 posted on 01/06/2017 8:32:08 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

bkmk


15 posted on 01/06/2017 8:42:02 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Incidentally, I bet that room full of Chinese hackers has one heck of MMORPG or Team gaming going on.


16 posted on 01/06/2017 9:58:27 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

My spidey sense tells me that many of those government hacks were really Democrat big wigs checking on their bureaucratic underlings for leaks and whistle blowing. :^}


17 posted on 01/07/2017 3:19:33 PM PST by cradle of freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson