Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Legal to Eat Genetically Modified Salmon in the U.S.
Cal Sportsman ^ | 11/20/2015 | A Press

Posted on 11/20/2015 8:56:40 AM PST by w1n1

The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday approved genetically modified salmon, the first such altered animal allowed for human consumption in the United States.

The Obama administration had stalled in approving the fast-growing salmon for more than five years amid consumer concerns about eating genetically modified foods. But the agency said Thursday the fish is safe to eat.

In announcing the approval, the FDA said that there are "no biologically relevant differences in the nutritional profile of AquAdvantage Salmon compared to that of other farm-raised Atlantic salmon."

AquAdvantage Salmon was created by the Massachusetts-based company AquaBounty. Ron Stotish, the company's CEO, said in a statement that the fish is a "game changer that brings healthy and nutritious food to consumers in an environmentally responsible manner without damaging the ocean and other marine habitats."

The fish grows twice as fast as normal salmon, so it reaches market size more quickly. It has an added growth hormone from the Pacific Chinook salmon that allows the fish to produce growth hormone all year long. The engineers were able to keep the hormone active by using another gene from an eel-like fish called an ocean pout that acts like an "on" switch for the hormone. Typical Atlantic salmon produce the growth hormone for only part of the year. Read the rest of the story here.


TOPICS: Food; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: salmon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 11/20/2015 8:56:40 AM PST by w1n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: w1n1

If it tastes good I’ll eat the hell out of it.


2 posted on 11/20/2015 9:00:44 AM PST by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1
Ok. And?

I'm almost ready for lunch...

/johnny

3 posted on 11/20/2015 9:02:27 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keat

I will only eat it if it has some dolphin meat mixed in with it.


4 posted on 11/20/2015 9:02:36 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Unbelievable.

Just as my health insurance is NONE of the feds constitutional business, so what I eat is also NONE of the feds constitutional business.

How I hate the FDA, the FCC, the HHS, and the rest of the unconstitutional portion of the federal government.


5 posted on 11/20/2015 9:02:37 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

It’s LEGAL to eat paste in the US.

If it’s better than that pale farm grown crap we get here...I am down for it.


6 posted on 11/20/2015 9:03:07 AM PST by Vermont Lt (I had student debt. It came from a bank. Not from the Govt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keat

And if it’s less expensive or better bargain.


7 posted on 11/20/2015 9:03:55 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

The larger concern for most modern so called “Frankenfood” isn’t even people’s diets. It’s the impact on the wild. If these super salmon stay in ponds, fine. Bon appetit. But what if someone lets them loose to breed in the wild.


8 posted on 11/20/2015 9:06:22 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

It’s a bad headline. Technically it’s always been legal to eat GMO salmon. What hasn’t been necessarily legal was selling and serving it for human consumption.


9 posted on 11/20/2015 9:07:19 AM PST by discostu (Up-Up-Down-Down-Left-Right-Left-Right B, A, Start)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I’d think the intent would be to farm grow it, rather than letting it get into the wild. You can get redder farm salmon by putting natural color into its feed but the product is supposed to be labeled as “artificially colored.”


10 posted on 11/20/2015 9:08:09 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

“How I hate the FDA, the FCC, the HHS, and the rest of the unconstitutional portion of the federal government.”

I think you are wrong about the FDA.

The government constitutionally is tasked with ensuring safety and security.

The FDA serves one of the few legitimate constitutional roles that the government does today.

If one wants to address corruption or abuse relating to the FDA, that is fair, but us a separate issue than its constitutionality.


11 posted on 11/20/2015 9:08:11 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Yes, and it’s so good for you that it’s important that it never be labeled as such. We wouldn’t want Mr. and Mrs. consumer to get the idea that they can make their own decisions about what to eat, now. Eat up, children.


12 posted on 11/20/2015 9:09:32 AM PST by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Somehow, a line of excess has been crossed between the place where it was not illegal to sell deathly poisonous spoiled olives (though one could get sued), and this. It is the country’s fault for letting “those who meddle with us for ‘our own good’” have the helm. Just because you SAY you are going to be a watchdog, doesn’t mean you aren’t a wolf....


13 posted on 11/20/2015 9:11:07 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AustinBill

Yeah it’s fine. Just don’t make us label it.


14 posted on 11/20/2015 9:11:18 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AustinBill

Sounds fair enough, but try to get something reasonable through this “liberal” charged political situation today.


15 posted on 11/20/2015 9:12:01 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Thanks for letting us know. I try not to eat GMO foods.


16 posted on 11/20/2015 9:12:37 AM PST by gattaca (Republicans believe every day is July 4, democrats believe every day is April 15. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
The government constitutionally is tasked with ensuring safety and security. The FDA serves one of the few legitimate constitutional roles that the government does today.

That's an overbroad statement, and it matches the FDAs overbroad actions.

17 posted on 11/20/2015 9:12:39 AM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: w1n1

Uh, I think it’s always been legal to eat. Just not legal to sell until recently.


18 posted on 11/20/2015 9:14:35 AM PST by the_boy_who_got_lost (I am for Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“The larger concern for most modern so called “Frankenfood” isn’t even people’s diets. It’s the impact on the wild. If these super salmon stay in ponds, fine. Bon appetit. But what if someone lets them loose to breed in the wild.”

That’s interesting in that determining safety in this regard would seem to go beyond the scope of the FDA which is to determine safety in people.

Is it the USDA that determines that? Or EPA?


19 posted on 11/20/2015 9:15:23 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AustinBill
Yes, and it's so good for you that it's important that it never be labeled as such. We wouldn't want Mr. and Mrs. consumer to get the idea that they can make their own decisions about what to eat, now. Eat up, children.

Exactly. What people don't realize is that what this is about is that the FDA has ruled that this GMO salmon doesn't have to be labels AS GMO salmon.

20 posted on 11/20/2015 9:15:45 AM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson