Posted on 09/07/2015 2:37:39 PM PDT by Elderberry
This shooting was very atypical, not an "always caught up in". That is what initially made it newsworthy.
The shootings in Chicago are typical therefore they do not make the national news. Lock up all the people in Chicago, they know they associate with 1%ers of society.
So you wouldn’t attend a “rally” coordinated or highly attended by bikers or crips/bloods etc.
How about a concert at say House of Blues or a concert shed ampetheater with hillside seating?
“guilt by association” is a bad thing.
Do bikers ever wear their colors to a gun show?
Would that compromise the integrity of all of the other potential buyers attending the gun show?
And a retired judge brought into the case was involved in the partisan prosecution of Gov. Rick Perry.
ping
The DA in this case was very selective in who was accused and detained. One necessary element was membership in Bandidos or Cossacks or “affiliated club”, which is whatever the DA thinks might stick. Members of some clubs, on scene, were unarrested and released after about a day. Quite a few others were never arrested, although they were detained as witnesses. The cops told nearly all of the detained they were only witnesses, then arrested most of them.
In 1993 law enforcers instigated a gunfight in Mt. Carmel completely with media coordination to cover the raid.
History may or may not be repeating itself but never say never.
The smoke in that case rose to the top ranks of government.
Most don’t care if law enforcement over reaches. Until they are the guest of honor of the over reach. Then it is a horse of a different color.
Additionally, if the BATFE had a CI in the Bandidos, why would they burn him on a gang fight and possibly lose their source inside the gang. Doesn't make much sense.
Ping
Oh how Alinsky-like of you!
When you can’t answer the question or message, attack the messenger!
Also, if you understood Tx law, which you don’t, you would understand why each of the 177 were charged with identical charging documents. And no, I’m not going to waste my time explaining it again.
I’ve give you a hint; “71”
Finally, who better to be a troll. Long time member, sleeper, uses his long-tine status to post things that he knows are false, just to stir up trouble.
If you care about FR, you might want to be very worried about him.... and some of us are a little concerned about you.
Not those not wearing colors.
Why are you still posting this BS you know is not true.
Chapter 71, Texas Statutes covers an incident exactly like this.
Moi?
Sacre Bleu
Non!
P.S., I love how all you LEO-haters attack the messenger, as opposed to stopping lying about an issue.
Off with your head.... such as it is.
You have already been outed why not give it a rest.
You claim to be a lawyer; act like a double naught spy. But your best work is constructing strawmen.
All that time in DC (if true) got your sycophant chops finely honed.
You are persona non grata to me.
Concurring bump...and you might be on to something with regard to some of these old timers. A lot of their rhetoric and 'concerns' can be found at the DUmp and other liberal hang outs.
“You are persona non grata to me.”
Promise?
First it was St Agnes one Saturday night
Then Yugoslavia along with some ASA guys.
Now you.
Will it never end??!??!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.