Posted on 05/23/2015 1:09:18 PM PDT by John Semmens
While one GOP presidential candidate filibustered legislation extending the National Security Agencys (NSA) authority to spy on Americans, another alleges that theres not a shred of evidence that this surveillance has violated anyones civil liberties.
GOP presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ken) spoke for 10 hours on the floor of the Senate contending that NSAs warrantless violations of privacy are unconstitutional. The Fourth Amendment was intended to protect us from unreasonable searches, Rand argued. It calls for government to obtain a warrant from a judge based on probable cause. The gathering of massive amounts of private information without such warrants flies in the teeth of the Amendments prohibition. We should be abolishing this intrusion, not extending it.
Prospective rival for the Republican nomination, former Florida Governor JEB Bush disagreed, calling the NSA a virtual guardian angel watching over and protecting us. I just cant buy the argument that we have anything to fear from our own government. Theyre on our side. We need to give them all the power and tools they say they need to keep us safe.
Bush said that the fact that the only people killed so far based on information gathered by the NSA are enemies of our government ought to reassure everyone that as long as they behave themselves they have nothing to fear. So the government knows who you phone, email and tweet. So what, as long as youre not doing anything wrong why should you care? I dont find the so-called scare phrase Big Brother is watching you particularly frightening. The whole idea behind the NSA originated with my big brother and hes a swell guy. We should be glad that he helped develop a program to watch over us.
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
http://azconservative.org/2015/05/23/failure-to-disclose-26-million-in-bribes-an-oversight-says-ceo/
Jebbie expects victories in NH, TX, and FL to push aside all other opposition.
You can certainly expect dems to cross over to vote for Jebster in soviet Red Hampshire’s ‘open’ primary. As long as political staff and media flood into the state to cover the ‘first in the nation’ primary (and filling the state’s tax coffers at the same time); it’s all good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.