Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polygamy freedom in our life time
News24 for South Africa ^ | November 4, 2014 | Justice Ngoma

Posted on 11/07/2014 12:07:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

1994 ought to have brought freedom entirely, but that never happened. We never got Polygamy freedom.

President Zuma has indeed proven that Polygamy can be practised in South Africa. President Zuma has been married at least five times. We now have to ask why South Africans opted to have selective freedom?

Marriage can be by capture, by purchase or by choice. Obviously the majority would agree with me that marriage by choice is the favorable, however some broke men would definitely opt for Marriage by capture. Why would the majority opt for Marriage by choice, obviously they can easily hide behind Marriage by choice as it is acceptable and seems as if, it has nothing to do with purchase. Lobola is purchase. You date a girl, you purchase. You have no Persal/Employee Number you can't purchase and you can be lonely for the rest of your life, who cares.

In short the marriage by choice favours the Caucasian men as money is in abundance to them, whilst most of African men have none. The church also has a role in this, as it promotes monogamous marriages. The one who has the most money get the most beautiful girl.

The truth must be told, African men are demanding their freedom to love as many women as they want. We need to do away with the Apartheid/Colonial thinking that dictates that polygamy is wrong. People must be free to practice polygamy with those who are comfortable too. Let the monogamous do their own thing and not dictate on polygamists on what is acceptable when it comes to their choice of multiple partners.

The truth must be told, men do not cheat because they do not love their wives, but they cheat because that is what they want to do. They want to love as many women as possible. Senzo Meyiwa, obviously believed in polygamy and he could not practice his choice. Why is that?

We need a Julius Malema, a champion to win us polygamy freedom. Polygamy must be made legal in South Africa, not only for cultural marriages.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: africa; colonialism; homosexualagenda; marriage; polygamy; southafrica
Capture, purchase or choice. Wow.
1 posted on 11/07/2014 12:07:15 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Coming soon to an Obamanation near you.


2 posted on 11/07/2014 12:09:15 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A South African judge, transplanted to Mass.,
suggested to Mr. ROmneyCARE that he impose
his last change of marriage. And he eagerly did.


3 posted on 11/07/2014 12:10:38 PM PST by Diogenesis (The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

I can’t see Obama taking on another wife...... Another Reggie maybe but never another wife.


4 posted on 11/07/2014 12:14:40 PM PST by dragonblustar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Really, why stop at homosexuality? Wouldn’t polygamy and incest laws have to be abolished too?


5 posted on 11/07/2014 12:15:18 PM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Reminds me of a line from MST3K: “McMillan and wife, and wife, and wife...”


6 posted on 11/07/2014 12:17:02 PM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Morgana; KC_Lion

Wow is right.

A beacon of barbarian tribalism there

I need to raise money for a trip to South Korea and a big net.

/s


7 posted on 11/07/2014 12:17:38 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The religious sacrament of marriage no longer has anything to do with the legality of marriage. People should just get married in the Church and dispense with the legal paperwork. It is now meaningless.

It makes financial sense, too, since the government punishes legally married people with higher taxes.

8 posted on 11/07/2014 12:20:41 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
trip to South Korea

You're in for a disappointment.

9 posted on 11/07/2014 12:21:15 PM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"...choice favours the Caucasian men as money is in abundance to them,..."

This Caucasian man would beg to differ with the abundance of money fantasy, a fantasy I might add, that is apparently shared by our own Obunga.

10 posted on 11/07/2014 12:22:37 PM PST by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
[ Really, why stop at homosexuality? Wouldn’t polygamy and incest laws have to be abolished too? ]

What if people want to marry Beasts?

I mean Disney has been pushign that agenda for a LONG time!


11 posted on 11/07/2014 12:23:25 PM PST by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Genoa; All
why stop at homosexuality? Wouldn’t polygamy and incest laws have to be abolished too?

Exactly.

And polygyny...women taking multiple husbands...and new family configurations of six men...three women (gotta accommodate the bisexuals)...

Our ObamaNation & the Democrats have declared such war upon marriage that they've convinced others than even a single partner is mere arbitrary "tradition"

12 posted on 11/07/2014 12:23:31 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

communists and liberaltarians would love all of that.


13 posted on 11/07/2014 12:31:40 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
A beacon of barbarian tribalism

Yup.

14 posted on 11/07/2014 12:52:04 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
They can love all they want only because someone else is paying to feed all their offspring.

Put a firm one child limit on ADC benefits and the sound of knees locking together would sound like thunder.

15 posted on 11/07/2014 12:53:05 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

You might want to head south to the Philippines instead.


16 posted on 11/07/2014 12:56:06 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I asked my priest about that. He said he was legally forbidden from marrying us without the state license.


17 posted on 11/07/2014 1:35:07 PM PST by posterchild (It takes a politician to declare a settled science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: posterchild
The state wants it both ways.

"Separation of Church and State" needs to start cutting both ways as well.

18 posted on 11/07/2014 1:36:11 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

very poosible


19 posted on 11/07/2014 2:04:54 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

>>”Separation of Church and State”

What does Romans 1:25+ say about the consequences of State establishments of religion / religiously established states — where the state establishment becomes a created object of mandatory worship?


20 posted on 11/08/2014 7:27:35 AM PST by HLPhat (This space is intentionaly blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson