Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama May Have To Shut Down Government To Halt The Keystone Pipeline
Zerohedge ^ | 11/05/2014 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 11/05/2014 5:42:57 PM PST by Rusty0604

It would appear the first big test for President Obama's 'veto' pen will be no lesser issue than the Keystone Pipeline. Reuters reports that Republicans will quickly introduce stand-alone legislation in the first quarter of 2015 that would approve the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline from Canada, Republican Senator John Hoeven said in an interview. "It's really a good chance to see if the president's willing to work with us," Hoeven said, suggesting they would pressure Obama to act one way or another by attaching the bill to some must-pass legislation leaving Obama's only option but to fold or shut down the government. As Reince Priebus exclaimed, "he's going to be boxed in." •MCCONNELL SAYS KEYSTONE EMPLOYMENT FIGURES ARE 'STUNNING'

As Reuters reports,

Republicans will quickly introduce stand-alone legislation in the first quarter of 2015 that would approve the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline from Canada, Republican Senator John Hoeven said in an interview.

"I think Keystone will be one of the first bills we'll be able to put up in the new Congress," said Hoeven, from the oil-rich state of North Dakota.

"I've got a bill right now that's got about 56 cosponsors. And with the election results, we'll have over 60 who clearly support the legislation," he said.

"It's really a good chance to see if the president's willing to work with us," Hoeven said. If President Barack Obama vetoes the bill, Republicans would seek to attach it to must-pass legislation on other energy or appropriations issues, Hoeven said.

The TransCanada-built pipeline, which would cross over an aquifer in Nebraska, has been held up for six years by environmental and even diplomatic concerns. President Obama, under pressure from environmental groups, has repeatedly ordered reviews by the State Department.

Proponents say the alternative of transporting the oil south by rail is more of an environmental risk, and say the Phase IV expansion would bring more than 800,000 barrels of oil per day to U.S. refineries from Canada and the Bakken region. The American Petroleum Institute claims a fully built pipeline could support 42,000 jobs and as many as 500,000 additional jobs in the U.S. by 2035.

“I actually think the president will sign the bill on the Keystone pipeline because I think the pressure — he’s going to be boxed in on that, and I think it’s going to happen,” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said Tuesday.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: keystonexl; keystonexlpipeline; pipeline

1 posted on 11/05/2014 5:42:57 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
"...And with the election results, we'll have over 60 who clearly support the legislation," he said.

60 in the Senate. If they can get 7 Dems that's a veto-proof majority. If not, and 0bama vetoes it, it's to the mat. If it happens I'll be sure to commemorate the occasion with that Pelosi-with-the-gavel smirking triumphalism picture when 0bamacare was jammed down our throats. Kind of remind our proggy friends where that whole thing came from.

2 posted on 11/05/2014 5:49:10 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Yeah... and then back to raising spending and the debt ceiling.

XL isn’t enough, I want a future for this country. And I won’t get it while this media demands the government subsidize consumer spending.


3 posted on 11/05/2014 5:52:49 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Isn’t the exempt Mary ‘Big Oil’ Landrieu all for the pipeline? Uh, oh.


4 posted on 11/05/2014 5:53:50 PM PST by Libloather (Embrace the suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
I'm waiting for the whole "shut down the government thing". The House should pass a budget. The Senate should pass the budget. The budget should be placed on Obama's desk.

I can see the media now: "It looks like the government will shut down tomorrow because of Republican extremists. Why are you throwing the country off a cliff?"
Talk Show Guest: "Look you moron: he signs it, we go on. He doesn't sign it, we shut down. It's 100% on him. One man. His responsibility. Get it?"

5 posted on 11/05/2014 5:53:50 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Democrats have a lynch mob mentality. They always have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

If that smarmy bastard Manchin wants to prove he’s not really 0bama’s buttboy, here’s his opportunity.


6 posted on 11/05/2014 5:54:54 PM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I don’t think an actual budget has passed since Obama has been pres.


7 posted on 11/05/2014 5:58:22 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

So if the Republican Congress goes the miles, ultimately over rides Obama’s veto, and delegates the funding to initiate the project it will be through the Department of Energy Obama controls will it not?


8 posted on 11/05/2014 5:59:23 PM PST by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

If he does that....


9 posted on 11/05/2014 6:01:12 PM PST by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

That would be great. Keep in mind that even with a veto proof majority, Obama would still try to block it as he is a islamo/bolshevik robot, impervious to facts, consequences; etc.


10 posted on 11/05/2014 6:02:51 PM PST by Stepan12 (Our present appeasement of Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
I don’t think an actual budget has passed since Obama has been pres.

Well, I'm hoping that changes.

11 posted on 11/05/2014 6:07:31 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Democrats have a lynch mob mentality. They always have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Well Obama today demanded a budget be passed with the current congress.


12 posted on 11/05/2014 6:13:07 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

The community organizer is about to meet real managers for the first time.

The media had better get with the program quickly. The questions they asked today were fair. Let’s see if they can wipe their lips and act like journalists instead of White House propagandists.


13 posted on 11/05/2014 6:15:16 PM PST by OpusatFR (I did make that. No one else did the work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Is Canada still interested in the project?


14 posted on 11/05/2014 6:18:36 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

Canadian oil producers ‘optimistic’ about Keystone XL

With the Republicans now controlling the U.S. Senate, Canadian oil producers hope pipeline will get approval.

http://www.thestar.com/business/2014/11/05/canadian_oil_producers_optimistic_about_keystone_xl.html


15 posted on 11/05/2014 6:21:18 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

I think they need 2/3 of the senate to override a veto (67)


16 posted on 11/05/2014 6:21:27 PM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
So if the Republican Congress goes the miles, ultimately over rides Obama’s veto, and delegates the funding to initiate the project it will be through the Department of Energy Obama controls will it not?

It is a private sector project. No government funding involved.

17 posted on 11/05/2014 6:59:38 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Thanks. Good news!


18 posted on 11/05/2014 7:19:32 PM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Would not the funding be for government agency oversight? That’s what I’m talking about. IOW wouldn’t Obama be able to use his control over agencies to intimidate, obfuscate the project to the point nothing gets done?

The guy is a real piece of work. I’d believe the only way to get anything done is to get rid of him via impeachment, and removal ASAP.


19 posted on 11/05/2014 7:25:46 PM PST by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

It could be attached to a bill funding Presidential travel or entertainment. If congress wants to play hard ball, there are many budget items that could be isolated.


20 posted on 11/05/2014 8:51:57 PM PST by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson