Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Supreme Court losing respect and trust of American citizens?
Examiner ^ | July 13, 2013 | M

Posted on 07/14/2013 4:31:25 PM PDT by usalady

Over the last four years the negative attitude of Americans toward the US Supreme Court indicates it is less respected and trusted each year.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; ideology; politics; polls; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Calvin Locke
I don't think he was out "jogging" in the heterosexual sense of the word...

I hear ya. LOL.

Even so ... A U.S. Supreme Court justice putting himself in harm's way like that?

41 posted on 07/14/2013 6:03:23 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
A U.S. Supreme Court justice putting himself in harm's way like that?

I guess his stance wasn't wide enough to measure up to some US Senators to hang out BWI, Reagan, or Dulles, protected by the TSA and other gun-toting agencies.

42 posted on 07/14/2013 6:13:04 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: usalady

Hey, check it out: you never make comments to FReepers:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:usalady/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change

In fact, you only seem to be here to promote your own Examiner blog garbage:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:usalady/index?tab=articles

Doesn’t that make you a scumsucking blogpimp?


43 posted on 07/14/2013 7:21:47 PM PDT by humblegunner (Creepy Ass Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usalady

The only case that I remember that I think is odious to our republic was Kelo. I am undecided on the Health care ruling, a majority of justices agreed that it was not constitutional w.r.t. the Commerce Clause; the court was likely in a bad position on the case. Had Obamadoesn’tcare been struck down the left would scream the same thing we are. Kennedy’s opinion in the DOMA case was odious, but the outcome of the decision was a win for federalism.


44 posted on 07/14/2013 7:33:31 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnietherocket3

Roe? Raich? Elliot? Casey?


45 posted on 07/14/2013 7:56:33 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Roberts’ twisted reasoning for Obamacare did substantial damage to the SC.

Yes. His "call it a tax" dodge wiped out my little fantasy that America stood for the sovereignty of the individual. In the new America we are subjects, not citizens.

46 posted on 07/14/2013 9:12:09 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I should have stated, recent decisions Roe was 40 years ago. That said it is odious. Raich I both have forgotten about and not read, so it is possible there is a subtlety in the case I am not aware of. Which Elliot decision are you referring to? Casey I see as a clarification of Roe, not really a separate case.


47 posted on 07/14/2013 9:39:58 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Reading the wikipedia summary of Casey, it is worth noting that the opinion was a plurality so its precedential value is limited IMO, unless I am misinterpreting the wiki entry.


48 posted on 07/14/2013 9:39:58 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ronnietherocket3

Sorry, it’s US v. Bean. For some reason I always think it’s Elliot.


49 posted on 07/14/2013 9:57:38 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ez

I was listening to a program on the radio recently when a guest said exactly that.


50 posted on 07/15/2013 5:43:42 AM PDT by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson