Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Speaker Boeher is done fighting Obamacare: It’s “the law of the land”
ABC News/The Right Scoop ^ | Nov. 8, 2012 | The Right Scoop

Posted on 11/08/2012 4:31:54 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

I really hope someone with more backbone challenges this feckless speaker:

ABC NEWS – Asked whether he will make another attempt to fully repeal the Affordable Care Act, Boehner said “the election changes that” and “Obamacare is the law of the land.”

(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: boehner4democrats; boehner4dnc; boehner4obama; boehner4obamacare; boehnervsgop; boehnervsteaparty; fubo; fujb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Da Coyote
hell yeah, we need to use all of our newly gained TEA party power to boot him out and impose our will over the legislative process.

Akin/Mourdock-2016

61 posted on 11/08/2012 5:53:09 PM PST by RC one (Akin/Mourdock-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption

EXACTLY!! And that is why I will REFUSE to participate


62 posted on 11/08/2012 5:53:57 PM PST by Captain7seas (Fire Jane Lubchenco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Considering that Boehner was one of the few Republicans who actually won this year, I think I’ll defer to his judgement. That’s all we need to do is lose the house of representatives in two years. that would surely help the conservative agenda.


63 posted on 11/08/2012 5:59:17 PM PST by RC one (Akin/Mourdock-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

we no longer have an opposition party, not even in name


64 posted on 11/08/2012 6:01:21 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

If this man is Speaker again, it is so so so over


65 posted on 11/08/2012 6:03:39 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

So what does this penalty tax buy you?

If you pay the penalty are you automatically enrolled in insurance. If so then everyone would choose this option because it is much cheaper than insurance.

The only problem is that the Government is broke and you get what you pay for.


66 posted on 11/08/2012 6:05:37 PM PST by desertfreedom765
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
The good news is that, for most people, the “penalty tax” for those who choose not to buy health insurance will cost a lot less than health insurance.

The bad news is that, for those free human beings who chose not to buy health insurance in the past, the penalty was ZERO.

God, I can't believe I'm actually reading such a pathetic rationalization from someone on a conservative web site.

What's next? "The good news is that anyone with no history of any kind of mental illness anytime in their entire family tree going back to Adams will be allowed to have one .22 cal rifle locked in the basement at all times with a fingerprint release lock and one biometrically preidentified bullet. [Never chambered, of course.]"

But hey, it's not like (some of you) you can't own a gun!

Good Lord. The "good news" is the Federal Government arrogating a power it hasn't the slightest authority to exercise under the Constitution. What's the bad news? The death camps won't be operating at full vigor for several years?

67 posted on 11/08/2012 6:10:16 PM PST by FredZarguna (I'm sorry, General Washington. We owed you and the men at Valley Forge so much more than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

That would have required a candidate with the credibility to attack Obamacare the way the Tea Party did in 2010. The author of Romneycare was in no position to repudiate Obama.


68 posted on 11/08/2012 6:16:39 PM PST by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Paul Ryan = House Speaker


69 posted on 11/08/2012 6:18:18 PM PST by cblue55 (The original point and click interface was a Smith and Wesson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Great comment. Paul Ryan would make an outstanding Speaker of the House.


70 posted on 11/08/2012 6:18:48 PM PST by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor

Right, Boehner will defeat Obamacare by quitting golf. Ty.


71 posted on 11/08/2012 6:26:21 PM PST by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Guess what, all the businessmen I know are planning to drop healthcare and pay for the less expensive vouchers. everyone else gets to pick up the tab for the difference.

It’s a disaster.


72 posted on 11/08/2012 6:29:09 PM PST by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

No, he’s not dumb. Elections have consequences and he knows it.


73 posted on 11/08/2012 6:56:35 PM PST by Mr Fuji
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
Yeah Clinton got re-elected and his stance on the shutdown was credited.

Gingrich won the battle and lost the war.

Clinton's poll numbers soared and Newt's plummeted and the myth that Clinton balanced the budget emerged.(even though it was all smoke and mirrors.)

Then Newt got run out of Congress.

74 posted on 11/08/2012 6:56:34 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation; Free ThinkerNY

He also once said:”If it’s good enough for Hawaii, it’s good enough for me.” A little later Michelle Bachmann dug up her “violin,” tuned it and played the same tune to his notes!!!


75 posted on 11/08/2012 7:31:44 PM PST by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
I really hope someone with more backbone challenges this feckless speaker

Any takers??? (Paul Ryan?)

76 posted on 11/08/2012 7:37:58 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Doesn’t the House control the purse strings?


77 posted on 11/08/2012 8:11:44 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (November 6, 2012.....A day that will live in infamy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Newt got run out of congress because he was an effective leader. Even his own caucus didn't like how much he whipped them in line. They liked the perks and the graft.

He was an effective leader with serious personal character flaws that could be exploited. He chose to leave instead of fighting.

He decided that it wasn't worth the effort when his own party refused to back him. He decided that writing books and giving speeches and making millions of dollars with his new young wife was better than constantly being pilloried for being effective at his job.

Clinton fought and kept his job, but history will record that he was a disgraced president who was impeached.

Gingrich won the battle and the war as he was able to force Clinton into the very concessions that effectively made Clinton a center right president and two termer. Gingrich saved Clinton's presidency. He knows it and Clinton knows it.

He also allowed for the House to remain in Republican hands for more than a decade until Hastert and Bush refused to operate in a Conservative manner. Remember how they lost the House in 2006 race they where branded as a party that ran a ‘culture of corruption’ by featherbedding their nests with pork and because a Congressman texted a page. They where called corrupt by of all people Nancy Pelosi.

If we had an effective negotiator and power broker like Gingrich instead of Boehner we would have effectively repealed Obomacare ALLREADY through the power of the purse strings. He could have forced Obama to repeal and replace the entire bill by simply using the power that the Constitution gave him. Some form of Medical Reform would have occurred, but it would have been better for all concerned. Including the President in the long run.

With the power of the Republican House, led by Gingrich, they effectively controlled the president. As is the entire idea of the Constitution. The House of Representatives is intended to have the most power, we simply need a ruthless Conservative leader who refused to buckle and is willing to put the hurt on the President. Gingrich did it. Had he been less morally ‘flexible’ he could have remained speaker for twenty years.

78 posted on 11/08/2012 9:43:40 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
"With the power of the Republican House, led by Gingrich, they effectively controlled the president."

hahahahah OK How much did Super Newt CUT the budget?

You actually believe the hype. Its sad really. They didn't Control anything they promised to CUT the Budget they didn't they promised to fix Social Security they didn't. What they did was they increased the Budget a little less than what the Democrats would've done and they kicked the can down the road.

Gingrich played it fast and loose and talked a good game but in the end he increased the budget and didn't cut a single dollar. And them's the facts!

79 posted on 11/08/2012 10:22:50 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Speaker Boeher is done fighting Obamacare: It’s “the law of the land”

Anything can be the "law of the land," if one group ignores the fundamental laws of the land, and their strongest opposition rolls over and plays dead.

The only thing necessary for evil to triumph, is for good (or cowardly) men to do nothing.

Put a fork in theGOP; they're done.

In my experience, the "bipartisanship" I've experienced in the last 10 years or so, is more accurately defined as the appeasement of losers, who prefer to call it "not lowering themelves" to the opponent's level : losers no less.

I don't care what a new party is called, so long as they are willing and able and unafraid to fight the enemy on their terms.

So many of us as simply waiting...

80 posted on 11/08/2012 11:43:24 PM PST by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson