Posted on 09/17/2012 4:08:29 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
But if he was a druggie thug, yep that matters and should come out in court.
“Zimmermans lawyers are attempting to assassinate Trayvon Martins character, said Benjamin Crump, in an interview with BET”
So......in giving this interview to BET, what is it that you’re doing?
They’re not irrelevant to the case. They may show what his attitude and mindset was prior to the incident.
Sorry, legally it is irrelevant.
The old putting the victim on trial routine seldom works, and often blows up in the defense’s face.
Especially if Z gets an “OJ jury”......
They can dish it out, but they can't take it.
[ Am I missing something here? ]
Yes.. The Honkyification factor.. if he was merely Hispanic they would leave him alone.. (more or less)
Zimmerman is Honkeyfied to the Max..
Travons parents are so brain washed they bleed Tide..
They speak Bull Squeeze out of both sides of their mouths..
They want their fifteen minutes of Bling.. and a few bucks..
Parents of a HoodRAt that raised him to be a HoodRat..
They are poisonous and toxic..
[ Am I missing something here? ]
Yes.. The Honkyification factor.. if he was merely Hispanic they would leave him alone.. (more or less)
Zimmerman is Honkeyfied to the Max..
Travons parents are so brain washed they bleed Tide..
They speak Bull Squeeze out of both sides of their mouths..
They want their fifteen minutes of Bling.. and a few bucks..
Parents of a HoodRAt that raised him to be a HoodRat..
They are poisonous and toxic..
Sorry, I respectfully disagree that it is clear, in advance, that NO MATTER WHAT may be found, it is already clearly irrelevant.
If evidence of habitual drug use is found, that is likely admissible.
Evidence of boasting about provoking violent confrontations with others? Relevant.
Tastes in porn? Irrelevant.
See, a good lawyer has to look in all reasonable places for relevant evidence, not decide in advance -- without knowing what's to be found -- that, "Oh, no, I mustn't Put The Victim On Trial." (Whether it will STRATEGICALLY backfire is an entirely separate question from the legal admissibility. But I believe that the kinds of admissible evidence I posited above -- drug use and boasting about aggression -- would be both admissible and helpful to the defense.)
If Mr. Martin’s MOTHER had not SENT HER SON to his FATHER’S GIRLFRIEND’s house to live (because she couldn’t deal with his drug dealing, suspensions from school, etc.) , TRAYVON would still be alive.
I hope Travon’s parents keep running their mouths. I’m sure none of this is escaping the notice of George’s lawyers.
Oops, wrong site.
their lawyer knows better. The rules of discovery are pretty clear. This is allowed.
Travons parents are so brain washed they bleed Tide..
They want their fifteen minutes of Bling.. and a few bucks..
Like you have attempted to assassinate Zimmerman's character since this began.
Whatever Trayvon had on his Facebook page or whatever was in his school records have nothing to do with why Zimmerman shot him.
They have everything to do with why Trayvon attacked Zimmerman and why he had to shoot him to stop the attack.
It seems likely that there will be an attempt by the prosecutor to characterize Trayvon as an upstanding bright law abiding child whose life was taken away by over zealous cop wanna be. (BSBSCNNMSNBCABCBSBS has already written the script) The defense should be able to challenge those assertions about Trayvon at least in a cross- examination. To prohibit discovery at this time seems to me to be an overreach by some with a vendetta or something to hide. If there is nothing damaging to be discovered, then why all the protestation. At the time of the trial is the proper oppertunity to challenge relevance, not before the chance of relevant evidence is discovered.
E. Pluribus Unum~ “ The drug dealer’s parents are discovering that “character assassination” is a two-way street. “
Exactly true !
And Zero’s involement, as well as the Dept. of “Just-Us” involvement , has elevated this case as being suject to political chicanery , and ‘second guessing’.
Martin’s Facebook postings include him comparing recipes for “drank” and “lean”. Don’t know what those are? Google it.
It will give new meaning to the meme that he was just going to the store to by Skittles and (watermelon) iced tea.
Any proof he was a drug dealer?
Beyond a presumption or your prejudice?
Do the drug dealer's supporters have any evidence for their accusations against Zimmerman, other than presumption and prejudice?
You fight Alinskyite Community Agitators with the same Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals they use on you.
It drives them crazy to have their own cynical tactics used against them.
Go back to your Community Agitator meeting where you belong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.