|This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.|
Locked on 05/05/2012 4:49:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Far too many postings of the same blog piece posted by the same Poster:
Skip to comments.Why is Romney being supported by the Global Warming Crowd?
Posted on 05/05/2012 3:54:38 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
How depressing. Conservatives remain divided this election cycle while the most liberal candidate for the GOP nomination in decades continues to pile up delegates. Meanwhile, the evidence continues to mount that Romney will govern to the left of George Bush either one. Romneys effort to portray himself as a conservative has had great success, primarily due to a black out on Romneys record not only by the mainstream press but also by much of the conservative media. Moreover, much of Americas conservative leadership has decided to give Romney a pass.
I posted a piece here a few weeks ago about Romneys aggressive effort to promote global warming in Massachusetts, policies that have largely been ignored in this campaign. Since that piece was posted, more evidence has surfaced that Romney will govern as a global warming zealot. It turns out that one of Romneys largest donors is Julian Robertson Jr., who has given $1.3 million to the pro-Romney Super Pac, Restore our Future. Robertson serves on the board of the Environmental Defense Fund and was a big cheerleader for Obamas 2009 Cap-and-Trade bill. When Robertsons office was questioned about Romneys views on global warming, a spokesperson responded that, he [Robertson] has confidence that Romney, once hes in there, will do the right thing. Can you spell SELL-OUT?
But thats not all. A number of other global warming zealots are backing Romney including billionaire Trammel Crow and Rob Sisson, who heads up a group called Republicans for Environmental Protection. And one of Romneys economic advisors is Greg Mankiw, who has spent much of his career pushing for a carbon tax to finance all the wacky global warming programs of the type Mitt pushed in Massachusetts. Also advising Romney on environmental issues are James Connaughton, a cap-and-trader who headed up Bushs Council of Environmental Quality, and Jeff Holmstead, a Bush EPA official known for his extreme global warming views. But this isnt surprising given the fact Romney hired hard-left environmentalist John Holdren now Obamas science advisor to be a key advisor while Governor of Massachusetts.
Robertson, Crow, Sisson, etc. must know something we dont. Thats right, were being set up folks. Were being screwed by the RINO wing of the GOP. Yet conservatives by the thousands continue to vote for Romney like lemmings crawling to water.
Part of the reason why this is happening is that many of Americas leading conservatives have remained silent or neutral in this race. Many leaders are tied to groups that took money from one of Romneys six PACS over the last six years and so they either cheerlead for Romney or stay silent. And then there are many conservatives supporting Romney in hopes of receiving a position in his administration. You know, the career first, America last types.
Sadly, even several Tea Party-supported politicians have endorsed Romney, such as South Carolina governor Nikki Haley, Jason Chaffetz, Christine ODonnell and Senator Jim DeMint (DeMint claims he hasnt endorsed Romney but all his staff member have and he publicly promotes Romney as a conservative on a daily basis). And one can guess why. Haley took $36,000 from Romneys Free and Strong America PAC for her 2010 campaign. Chaffetz took $7,000 from Romney and ODonnell received $5,000. And Senator DeMint, a guy I used to think was a conservative superstar, took $20,000 from Romney the last few cycles. These people have allowed Romneys wealth to jade their judgment since all of them surely know about Romneys liberal record.
But it gets worse, FEC records shows that Romney poured close to a million dollars into the coffers of 167 congressional and senate candidates during the 2010 cycle. And thats not counting the $404,000 given to state and local GOP parties in 2010. But the buy-off money wasnt just given out willy-nilly. The Romney team targeted the bulk of the money to candidates, groups, and local parties in states in which they felt Romney was weakest South Carolina, for example. Thats why South Carolina Governor Haley and Sen. DeMint received more money than most but they probably thought that Romney just really liked them. Talk about naive. Needless to say, glowing pro-Romney statements from people like Haley and DeMint convinced many conservative voters its ok to vote for Romney. Thats the whole plan Jim and Nikki. For Gods sake, wake up.
Aside from the slew of conservative groups, publications and think tanks that took money from Romney and now proclaim him a conservative, we shouldnt forget Team Romneys covert operations. For example, one group was formed called Evangelicals for Mitt, headed by David and Nancy French. Its main purpose is the propagandizing of evangelicals into believing Romney is a superstar on the social issues. Their website simply parrots items given to them by the Romney campaign and theyve done a tremendous job covering up the fact that Governor Romney carried out perhaps the most aggressive gay rights agenda of any governor in American history.
EFM also does a great job pooh-poohing the idea that Romney illegally, and in violation of his constitutional oath, implemented same-sex marriage in Massachusetts. Apparently, they know more about this issue than a slew of constitutional scholars who have looked at what Romney did and concluded he violated the state constitution by ordering his clerks to marry same-sex couples in the complete absence of any legislative authority. But it took Time Magazine to expose this phony group: campaign finance experts say the couples group looks like a thinly disguised extension of the Romney campaign. Well, duh. The article details how some of Romneys big donors finance this group and how EFMs founders are tied into the Romney campaign. But why did it take a Time reporter to expose this front group?
The strategy of dumping money into the coffers of hundreds of conservative congressmen, groups and party entities, not to mention the creation of front groups designed to mislead conservative voters, is surely one of the biggest stories of the 2012 campaign, but no one in the conservative movement will talk or write about it. Meanwhile, every time Romney opens his month, he lets slip once again that he doesnt possess any core convictions. One week hes praising the Chinese for how productive they are due to their efficient regulators (kind of like praising Hitler for making the trains run on time). And the next week he babbling about supporting minimum wage hikes indexed to the Consumer Price Index. Such a policy, of course, would lead to minimum wage hikes on an annual basis and drive the cost of doing business through the roof. Thats a hell of a jobs plan.
Romney doesnt have a conservative worldview and never has. His advisors and big donors all hail from the liberal wing of the party. Hes using bought-off politicians and front groups to sucker conservatives, tea partiers and the Christian right into thinking hes one of them, but once elected, he will make George W. Bush look like a hard-line conservative. But thats assuming he will be elected. If the history of RINO presidential candidates is any indication, Obama will beat him in November. And the folks to blame for this disaster will be our own conservative leadership for their failure to speak out against him.
“I have put our nation on a path to slow, stop, and eventually reverse the growth of our greenhouse gas emissions. In 2002, I announced our first step: to reduce America’s greenhouse gas intensity by 18 percent through 2012. I’m pleased to say that we remain on track to meet this goal even as our economy has grown 17 percent.”
Re-posting the same funny pics, charts, comments, and links in the comment section of multiple threads has been a practice that mods over the years seem to be ok with.
Someone posting a news article that has ALREADY been posted has usually resulted in the article being pulled and an "already posted" being left in the "reason pulled" explanation by the mods.
Just curious if all posts of "ALREADY POSTED" articles will be treated the same way or not. Seems crappy to have your post of an important news article pulled when it was only posted once before at 3am, yet the behavior above is tolerated.
“Gloom, despair, and agony on me...
Deep dark depression, excessive misery -
If it weren’t for bad luck, I’d have no luck at all,
Gloom, despair and agony on me!”
You never go to war with the army you want, but with the army you have. Sure, Mitt Romney seems a slender reed upon which to place all our reliance and faith, but consider the alternative.
I know, I know, the lesser of two evils. The lesser of two evils is STILL evil, in the eyes of some, but there are signs that Mitt can be at least partially redeemed, given that the office of President of the United States does not really offer a lot of latitude on the short term.
Just keep the terms short. And the reins tight.
"we do agree: Our country must take action to address climate change.
-Newt Gingrich to Nancy Pelosi in 2008
It’s probably because he is part of them.
He will be the Julia Gillard of our country............
It is now illegal to criticize the Australian government about the Carbon Tax. The last great power grab. You choose, Romney or Liberty....open RNC convention. We need a choice this time.
These climate change, biodiversity, water shortage - you name it impending environmental disasters are all about providing justification for implementing global initiatives that undermines private property and reallocate control over natural resources. That control will be in the hands of the rich so that they can get richer.
My apologies if that is the case. Was just curious why the 2 different standards.
“Just keep the terms short. And the reins tight.”
Fantasies die hard.
Because he’s just another Warmtard.
It would help immensely if you hit the abuse button after posting a note. We are all volunteers back here and are often too busy to log into the main Moderator accounts in order to see if we have been Pinged. Compare that to when anyone hits the abuse button we see that instantly and can respond appropriately. Thanks.
What’s Baldwin’s solution? Usually, when one presents a problem, some semblance of a solution is presented.
Here’s the reason why Romeny and Obama are AGWers.
I think the old standby definitions of who votes for which party have been blown away in this campaign. I think people recognize that Im not a partisan Republicanthat Im someone who is moderate, and that my views are progressive.
-Mitt Romney (2002)
Video of the quote:
Obama continued: I am somebody who is no doubt progressive. I believe in a tax code that we need to make more fair. I believe in universal health care. I believe in making college affordable. I believe in paying our teachers more money. I believe in early childhood education. I believe in a whole lot of things that make me progressive.
(Think Ill write in Sarah Palin for POTUS! Any suggestions for a write in candidate for VeeP?)
Please refrain from re-posting the same blog piece or news article. You can always bump your own thread. One person spamming the same blog piece 6 times in one month is not appreciated by anyone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.