Posted on 03/02/2012 11:01:10 AM PST by jmaroneps37
Anyone who actually watched the presentation from Sheriff Joe Arpiao’s all-volunteer Cold Case Posse knows the truth about how much of a fraud Barack Obama is.
If we had an honest media news as important as what Arpiao and his people presented would have demanded that ALL media – TV and radio cover his press conference live from start to finish. Those who watched the presentation also understand that if it had been nationally broadcast and the American people heard and saw the actual evidence, Obama would be gone by May.
Nevertheless, instead of reporting what Arpiao presented the AP and others took the opportunity to attack Arpiao personally. Not surprisingly the now toothless feckless Glenn Beck pandered to the Left and joined the AP. He gave himself away by using their stock lie “Theories that the president’s birth certificate is fake have been widely discredited.”
Mr. Beck isn’t it really the truth that you didn’t have the nerve to simply report what Arpiao presented for fear that the media would label you (gulp) “a birther?” Do you actually think pandering to the Left will keep them from rolling you over the coals any chance they get?
By the way, when DID someone – anyone- rip apart the charges that Obama’s birth certificate is a fake? When DID that happen Mr. Beck? When did anyone make a point by point presentation supporting the authenticity of that obviously fake document?
Who explained away the numerous problems in the document while we weren’t looking? That video must have escaped our view.
Furthermore when did anyone stop laughing at the “silly birthers” long enough to refute the “obviously false assertion” that the Post Office only used four digit year stamps in 1980 when it stamped Obama’s Selective Service card?....
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
I think you got the whole picture there... Sheriff Arpaio has standing to make life `interesting` for our 1600 Pennsylvania resident.
“Beck jumped the shark for me six months ago.”
Do I get points for bailing on Beck in 2008 after listening to him for 7 years? He refuses to recognize this threat to a national security provision of the Constitution.
I am not the problem. I am not standing in your way. Perhaps the problem can be found by looking in the mirror. Or perhaps the problem is that there is no way to totally prove your case. That happens sometimes. Or perhaps the problem is that most folks are more concerned with WHAT HE BELIEVES than WHERE HE WAS BORN. There are any number of reasons why your issue has not caught on, but those of us who are sympathetic but prefer to focus on other issues are NOT YOUR PROBLEM. I submit YOU are your own worst enemy with absolutely stupid statements like the one you just made.
I definitely understand the sentiment, but I think having the punk removed by a court or judge would be the worst thing, because if successful, the left would then seek the removal of every single GOP president thereafter on any trumped up reason they could imagine.
It's a serious threat in more ways than many would imagine. Take command authority as one example. All legal authority for military orders flows from the commander-in-chief.
An illegal commander -in-chief puts the military at direct odds with their sworn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.
They already do anyway and at least no usurper would ever again steal the most powerful office in the world.
Not via federal judge they don’t, and it is our job as citizens to make sure that we don’t allow our white house to be stolen by shady characters.
“An illegal commander-in-chief puts the military at direct odds with their sworn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.”
Well, at least Terry Lakin recognized that fact. Joint Chiefs, not so much.
“All legal authority for military orders flows from the commander-in-chief.”
...such as ordering the upcoming ‘punishment’ for 5 American soldiers who were simply assigned a duty that included burning trash. Authority that may, in fact, permit these same soldiers to be turned over to and tried in Afghan Islamic courts, under rules/laws that can impose death sentences, as burning a Koran does in Iran.
But hey, let’s not worry about whether the CIC is actually legal in and of himself in the position with which he is currently authorized to hold. Nah. Who cares?
/something, and it ain’t sarcasm and it ain’t ridicule and it ain’t a rant.
Don’t you wonder why he used non-LEO volunteers instead of his own paid professional LEO investigators? It is hard to imagine, for example, that anything his “posse” produces could be legally presented to a grand jury. The fact is he deliberately choose NOT to use his real law enforcement powers.
I find it odd if he was actually serious about solving a real crime.
No I don’t wonder at all. He made it clear why in that he did not want to spend taxpayer money on what looked like a politically motivated investigation. Now he has probable cause and he can use his own detectives and powers.
He can do a number of things now using state resources that would have been inadvisable to do before. He’s playing the game perfectly.
But how he is playing the game is not the issue, it is the evidence he has revealed and the MSM reaction to it that is at issue.
Wow, Andrea Shea King Show tonight:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/askshow/2012/03/03/the-andrea-shea-king-show
They are LEO. They are retired LEO’s, and he used volunteers so nobody could shut off funding to make the issue go away. Which shows he really WAS serious about it.
And if you had listened to the presentation you would have known that they DID use real law enforcement powers, because Mike Zullo said the only way they were able to get the postal stamp to mutilate in duplicating the draft registration stamp was through the powers of Sheriff Joe’s office. He also said it was very disturbing to him that a stamp with such restricted access had been used in a forgery. I guess that tells you that not all “paid professional LEO investigators” can be trusted to be honest...
The posse found probable cause and recommended a full criminal investigation, with all the powers that entails. Before law enforcement can get warrants, etc they have to show probable cause so this posse has just already done that part for the paid LEO’s.
Of course, trying to cut down the messengers doesn’t change the evidence that’s been produced, but I guess that’s what people do when they can’t refute the evidence that’s been produced.
Wow, my response followed yours point by point. I guess great minds think alike. =)
Yours was better though because it was shorter. =)
Believe that if you wish. So Joe is so powerless that he has no control over his own budget? OK
Mike Zullo is now selling an e-book about the investigation. His co-author is Corsi, well known birther.
“Corsi and Zullo are selling the investigation online for $9.99, and Corsi said they are splitting the profits. In a phone interview Friday night, Corsi told 3TV neither Arpaio nor the MCSO will see profits from the sales.
Zullo’s co-author is Jerome Corsi, a well-known political conspiracy writer who started the Swift-boat case against Sen. John Kerry. More recently, Corsi, who writes for World Net Daily, has spent the last few years driving the birther movement.
Corsi supplied much of the research for the MCSO investigation, which labeled the president’s birth certificate “a fake.””
Fair and impartial investigate = lets make money? Don’t think so. Corsi used Joe to make a buck.
“Corsi and Zullo are selling the investigation online for $9.99, and Corsi said they are splitting the profits. In a phone interview Friday night, Corsi told 3TV neither Arpaio nor the MCSO will see profits from the sales.
Zullo’s co-author is Jerome Corsi, a well-known political conspiracy writer who started the Swift-boat case against Sen. John Kerry. More recently, Corsi, who writes for World Net Daily, has spent the last few years driving the birther movement.
Corsi supplied much of the research for the MCSO investigation, which labeled the president’s birth certificate “a fake.””
Joe was used by Corsi to make a buck. You really think anyone is going to think this was a fair and impartial investigation? Really?
So what? $10 for an online book is hardly covering costs of typing, printing and editing.
In a phone interview Friday night, Corsi told 3TV neither Arpaio nor the MCSO will see profits from the sales.
How is this compromising? Answer: it's not.
Zullo’s co-author is Jerome Corsi, a well-known political conspiracy writer who started the Swift-boat case against Sen. John Kerry.
How is this detracting? It's not. The Swift Boat Veterans showed Lurch to be the massive phony that he is.
More recently, Corsi, who writes for World Net Daily, has spent the last few years driving the birther movement.
That you use the label 'Birther' reveals more about you.
Corsi supplied much of the research for the MCSO investigation, which labeled the president’s birth certificate “a fake.””
He may have given the volunteer retired posse members some points to verify, but they had to verify it. So how is your remark relevant? Answer: it's not.
Joe was used by Corsi to make a buck.
An online book for $10 is going to make someone rich? No, probably just pay costs and get the information to the interested public because the MSM will certainly not get the info out there.
You really think anyone is going to think this was a fair and impartial investigation? Really?
Based on a set of irrelevant remarks, you are concluding the investigation is unfair and biased? Really?
Do you have any evidence that retired LEO Zullo has 'unclean hands'? Is dishonest? I didn't think so.
Looks like you are an amateur critic at best. But more likely you are a biased inexperienced heckler that is trying out their meager forum skills on an issue that is way above your head.
Keep trying.
Are you saying the BC is NOT a forgery?
You can make all the connections you want, but that doesn’t alter the fact it’s a forgery.
No document expert will ever tell you that you can detect forgery without looking at the original document.
Every time a digital image is downloaded, open in a program and then saved it can have its properties changed. Digital imageos tell you nothing you can take to court.
So two main investigators have a financial incentive to come up with a certain result and the investgation can still be fair and impartial?
Any court in the country would laugh such a “investigation” out of the room.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.