Skip to comments.Beckís pandering coverage of Arpiao presentation reminds us why he isnít on television anymore
Posted on 03/02/2012 11:01:10 AM PST by jmaroneps37
Anyone who actually watched the presentation from Sheriff Joe Arpiaos all-volunteer Cold Case Posse knows the truth about how much of a fraud Barack Obama is.
If we had an honest media news as important as what Arpiao and his people presented would have demanded that ALL media TV and radio cover his press conference live from start to finish. Those who watched the presentation also understand that if it had been nationally broadcast and the American people heard and saw the actual evidence, Obama would be gone by May.
Nevertheless, instead of reporting what Arpiao presented the AP and others took the opportunity to attack Arpiao personally. Not surprisingly the now toothless feckless Glenn Beck pandered to the Left and joined the AP. He gave himself away by using their stock lie Theories that the presidents birth certificate is fake have been widely discredited.
Mr. Beck isnt it really the truth that you didnt have the nerve to simply report what Arpiao presented for fear that the media would label you (gulp) a birther? Do you actually think pandering to the Left will keep them from rolling you over the coals any chance they get?
By the way, when DID someone anyone- rip apart the charges that Obamas birth certificate is a fake? When DID that happen Mr. Beck? When did anyone make a point by point presentation supporting the authenticity of that obviously fake document?
Who explained away the numerous problems in the document while we werent looking? That video must have escaped our view.
Furthermore when did anyone stop laughing at the silly birthers long enough to refute the obviously false assertion that the Post Office only used four digit year stamps in 1980 when it stamped Obamas Selective Service card?....
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
I don’t listen to Beck anymore for many reasons. This is one of them. Not only has Beck jumped the shark but along with Ann they have jumped the moon. The have both lost credibility in my mind.
and to think I was flamed off of Free Republic and Lucianne and American Thinker and all over the place in 2009 when I pointed out in two articles that Beck was not intellectually consistent.
Notice how quiet the after-birthers are?
Where’s the “Bither’s need eat crow” jerk?
Anyone who is not a birther at this point should just have STUPID tattooed on their forehead.
Fence-sitter will be fence-sitting until Obama personally knocks on their front door to tell them he’s fraud. Then they will still mock birthers.
But you have no problem bashing birthers, do you?
Sheriff Joe’s report still not enough for you?
Tell me more. I dunno, the hair raises on the back of my neck with Glenn.
My head tells me that what I’m seeing is probably just untreated bi-polar disorder - that this is what it sounds like, obsesses on - a fixation. Thinking this, I feel sorry for him.
I can’t follow his web of conspiracies, so tightly woven as to be, for me, incoherent often.
I remember that time....oh and Freep mail
Whoa dude - chill.
What made you say that? My comment was about Beck. You should not read anything else into it. I have no problem with Sheriff Joe. I choose not to bash birthers nor is that my chosen cause either.
The problem with “birthers” is that they want a court to remove the president, and that is a serious problem.
It’s one thing to have a president impeached, but that isn’t going to happen with the gutless GOP and Dingy Harry.
The only other method is for us to vote him out, and that is what it’s going ot come down to.
Having a judge remove a president would open a can of worms that could never be closed.
And yeah, Obama is a fraud, no doubt about it.
I have always been skeptical of the claims of ineligibility, but have been suspicious that something is being hidden in O’s past. I think Arpaio gives these suspicions credibility. Corsi is a 9/11 truther, and Taitz is flaky, but Sheriff Joe is solid, and I wish him luck in the search for the truth, whatever it is. Beck didn’t mention that Arpaio’s report also discusses the draft card, and a “person of Interest” involved in the alleged forgery. That is something beyond what has been mentioned before.
Arpaio’s presentation was devastating and should be enough to get obama kicked out of office - or at least keep him from running a second term. The problem is - where do we go from here if neither the liberal or conservative media will take it up?
I missed where Wright was “bashing birthers”.
The birther business is not the definition of “intellectual dishonesty”, which encompasses a broad swath of processing thoughts on the way to a conclusion.
You bashed birther on a previous thread. A snide remark about there being only eight of us.
Beck’s a joke, three hours of him and his bozo’s in their mocking voices is quite dull.
Can you imagine what would have happened in 1972 if there was credible evidence that the president had forged and fraudulent documents? This is the most amazing thing, the power of being labelled a racist has reduced the conservative media and congress to jelly.
The one thing Arpaio did not discuss was the SSN. I hope that is still an active part of the posse’s investigation. When you put all of this together you have a complete fraud who has made it to the whitehouse.
The Beck radio show can get me frustrated when he promises that he has a very important revelation to make. Then, he futzes around, making jokes and small talk for an hour. After stringing you along, he finally makes his revelation, which is something you can find on the Blaze. Beck never gets to the point.
We will be found going nowhere as these discoveries apply to Obama, however, going forward we have seen states taking up legislative protections from such a vague past being successful in the future.
Impeachment at this point would take longer to accomplish and spend more clock time than just fighting it out in the general election campaign, and in Kitchen Sink style. :)
Do you do that to your husband too? Bring up old arguments every time you and he have a new one?
Actually, the real problem with being a ‘birther’ is that we want the Constitution to be upheld across all three branches of government.
But yes, Beck and his asinine views on 0bama’s eligibility really frost me. REALLY.
I also don’t appreciate his Newt bashing when he doesn’t apply that anti-Progressive view to other candidates, e.g., Romney.
Ironically in this particular thread, by taking a little swipe at Beck, I was SUPPORTING the birther side of the debate.
But actually, this thread was about BECK and it simply used the Arpaio issue as a jumping off point. I was on topic, which was Beck.
Some folks are single issue folks and they simply cannot see around that one single obsession they have.
Where do you come up with this?
They want to remove Obama’s name from a presidential ballot that he is ineligible to be on, NOT remove him from office which would require impeachment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.