75 reasons to be skeptical of "global warming"

joshfulton.blogspot.com ^ | February 21, 2010 | Josh Fulton

[neverdem]

* Carbon dioxide contributes to only 4.2 - 8.4% of the greenhouse gas effect

* Only approximately 4% of carbon dioxide is man-made

* Water vapor accounts for 90 - 95% of the green house gas effect

* 99.99% of water vapor is natural, meaning that no amount of deindustrialization could get rid of it

* There have been many times when the temperature has been higher than it is now including the Medieval Warming Period, the Holocene, the Jurassic, and the Eemian

* Increases in carbon dioxide follow increases in temperature by about 800 years, not precede them

* Phil Jones of the Hadley CRU, and key figure in the "climategate" scandal, admits that there has been no "statistically significant" global warming since 1995

* 2008 and 2009 were the coolest two years of the decade

* During the Ordovician period carbon dioxide concentrations were twelve times what they are now, and the temperature was lower

* Solar activity is highly correlated with temperature change:...

[neverdem]

All of the reasons appeared to be linked to their sources.

[Vanbasten]

Great find!

[ConservativeHideout]

That is a great find. This should be posted for everyone to see.

[mehill]

saved for reading later

[FormerACLUmember]

Good post. I will forward the article to my global warmism religion friends.

[bitterohiogunclinger]

The number one reason is: Liberals believe in it, therefor it is a lie.

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[donhunt]

Does this mean I can take my polar bear out of my freezer now?

[Mrs. Don-o]

Cool! I’m going to circulate this around a little.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Cool! I’m going to circulate this around a little.

[freedom_forge]

Also see: http://www.accesstoenergy.com/

and: http://www.oism.org/s32p686.htm

[neverdem]

Scandal update - this 75 reasons to be skeptical of "global warming" is a keeper. I bookmarked it.

The US government spends over $2.5B funding climate research every year, and over $7B when grants for technology, tax breaks, and foreign aid are included (this is while Exxon gave $22M to global warming skeptics over a 10 year period)(pdf)

That quote from 75 reasons is near the end. It's from CLIMATE MONEY by Joanne Nova, July 21, 2009. The first sentence in the Summary for Policy Makers

The US government has spent over $79 billion since 1989 on policies related to climate change, including science and technology research, administration, education campaigns, foreign aid, and tax breaks.

16 'Endangerment' Lawsuits Filed Against EPA Before Deadline

The Latest on Hacking the Planet (Geoengineering to cool the planet without any warming in 15 yrs)

ANOTHER Nail in the Global Warming Coffin

Budget debate could turn into global warming fight at Senate hearing (cut off EPA's cash!)

[GeronL]

do we need any more reasons

[neverdem]

do we need any more reasons

Don't you want all of this fraud exposed and prosecuted? These x/?%*x#x wanted to steal our money and our sovereignty.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[GeronL]

They were looking to impoverish the world under dictatorship and become multi-billionaires. Yes I want them exposed and ruined.

[PGalt]

OUTSTANDING!!! HOORAY Josh Fulton! Thanks very much for the ping and your comment at #14. If it was up to me things would much more than HEAT UP for these criminals.

The damage they have done is incalculable.

[GOPJ]

Thanks for the ping.