THE CHEESE STANDS ALONE

jbjd ^ | 09.20.2009 | jbjd

[jbjd]

THE CHEESE STANDS ALONE

© 2009 jbjd

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United State House of Representatives, 3rd in line of Presidential succession, http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa010298.htm, acting in a non-governmental role as Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention, signed and submitted to the Board of Elections in the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Official DNC Certification of Barack Obama’s Nomination. Therefore, this Complaint of Election Fraud and Request for Investigation to the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, specifically names her.

It’s not as if citizens have not tried to find out directly from the DNC on what basis they verified Mr. Obama’s Constitutional qualifications before submitting his name to election officials to print on the general election ballot in all of those states that restrict access to the state ballot to only those candidates who are eligible for the job. Last December, when I first saw the Certification Ms. Pelosi signed for HI – you know, with that added line saying he is “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution,” required by HI law – I asked Justin Riggs to compose a letter to her, asking for the basis of such Certification, and made arrangements to hand deliver this letter to Ms. Pelosi’s House office. To date, Mr. Riggs has received no reply to his inquiry. http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com/2009/01/hand-delivered-letter-to-nancy-pelosi.html

Then, there were the letters sent to Alice Germond, Secretary of the 2008 DNC Convention and Ms. Pelosi’s co-signer on those Certifications of Nomination. This time, voters from several states couched their request for documentation in terms of public records laws. http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com/2008/12/request-for-documents-from-democratic.html. Like Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Germond also failed to respond to these requests for documentation. However, this time, a reply of sorts was forthcoming, from of all people, the General Counsel of the DNC, Joseph E. Sander, who pointed out the following: “The Democratic National Committee is not a state agency subject to the open records or freedom of information statutes of any state.”

From: Joseph E. Sandler [mailto:sandler@sandlerreiff.com] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 3:50 PM To: (name withheld)@comcast.net Cc: Alice Germond Subject: Open Records Act Request

Dear Ms. (name withheld): This will respond to your e-mail dated 12/31/2008, entitled “Records Request,” directed to DNC Secretary Alice Germond. The Democratic National Committee is not a state agency subject to the open records or freedom of information statutes of any state. If you are inquiring about the primary or caucus process used by any state Democratic Party, that process was set forth in the State Party’s Delegate Selection Plan for the 2008 Democratic National Convention. To the extent that you seek documents relating to the filing of any candidate in a state-run presidential preference primary, your request should be directed to the Secretary of State or state Board of Elections in that state.

Sincerely yours, Joseph E. Sandler General Counsel, Democratic National Committee

Joseph E Sandler Sandler Reiff & Young PC 300 M Street, S.E. Suite 1102 Washington, D.C. 20003 Tel: (202) 479 1111 Fax (202) 479-1115 Cell (202) 607 0700

Of course, by focusing on the fact, he cannot be legally compelled to turn over these records, Mr. Sandler qua the DNC, thumbs his nose at the voters from states all across the country, who have enacted laws permitting their state to expend its public resources to print on state ballots the name of the nominee for POTUS from this private club. In exchange, these voters only required the major political party to ascertain their nominee is eligible for the job. After all, had that candidate for POTUS been championed by any lesser organization, the state may have undertaken such scrutiny. (Nicaraguan born Roger Calero, the candidate for POTUS of the Socialist Workers Party, http://www.themilitant.com/2008/7202/720253.html, did make it onto the general election ballot in several states. http://www.politics1.com/p2008-ballot.htm However, the laws in these states did not require the nominee for POTUS to be eligible for the job in order to appear on the ballot. Remember, notwithstanding voters often believe, they are electing the POTUS through their vote at the general election, the function of the general election is only to “appoint” Electors, which appointment is required by the Constitution. http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/never-less-than-a-treason-2-of-2/ And to the extent state elections officials refused to print Mr. Calero’s name on the general election ballot, well, even in cases where eligible nominees are otherwise “entitled” to have their names printed on the ballot, this does not prohibit state election officials from exercising their discretion to exclude from the ballot any candidate commonly recognized as ineligible because he is not a Natural Born Citizen.)

Presuming that voters are unaware the Party could voluntarily comply with their requests for documentation as to the basis for Certifying, Barack Obama is Constitutionally qualified for the job of POTUS insults both the integrity and the intelligence of these voters. It is precisely such hubris and obfuscation that has given rise to this Complaint of Election Fraud against The Honorable Nancy Pelosi.

[manonCANAL]

this is gonna make her face tighter.
join (oathkeepers.org)

[manonCANAL]

this is gonna make her face tighter.
join (oathkeepers.org)

[jarofants]

It’s making other things on her body tighter too I bet!!!

[Uncle Chip]

The distant thunder is getting closer and closer ==

[BuckeyeTexan]

Ping.