Posted on 02/02/2005 8:38:23 PM PST by Dr. Marten
We Had a Democracy Once, But You Crushed It
by Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
August 9, 2003
In Thursday's Washington Post, Condoleeza Rice, the President's National
Security Advisor, writes the following:
"Our task is to work with those in the Middle East who seek progress toward greater democracy, tolerance, prosperity and freedom. As President Bush said in February, ‘The world has a clear interest in the spread of democratic values, because stable and free nations do not breed ideologies of murder. They encourage the peaceful pursuit of a better life.'"
Now, if we only had a nickel for every time Bush, or Rice, or Colin Powell, or Paul Wolfowitz or Dick Cheney or Richard Perle or Donald Rumsfeld talked about bringing democracy to the Middle East.
Talk, talk, talk.
Here's something you can bet on: Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz will not hold a press conference this month to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the U.S.-led coup of the democratically elected leader of Iran -- Mohammed Mossadegh.
Rice and Powell won't hold a press conference to celebrate Operation Ajax, the CIA plot that overthrew the Mossadegh.
That was 50 years ago this month, in August 1953.
That's when Mossadegh was fed up with the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company -- now BP -- pumping Iran's oil and shipping the profits back home to the United Kingdom.
And Mossadegh said -- hey, this is our oil, I think we'll keep it.
And Winston Churchill said -- no you won't.
Mossadegh nationalized the company -- the way the British were nationalizing their own vital industries at the time.
But what's good for the UK ain't good for Iran.
If you fly out of Dulles Airport in Virginia, ever wonder what the word Dulles means?
It stands for the Dulles family -- Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and his brother, the CIA director, Allen Dulles.
They were responsible for the overthrow of the democratically elected leader of Iran.
As was President Theodore Roosevelt's grandson, Kermit Roosevelt, the CIA agent who traveled to Iran to pull off the coup.
Now why should we be concerned about a coup that happened so far away almost 50 years ago this month?
New York Times reporter Stephen Kinzer puts it this way:
"It is not far-fetched to draw a line from Operation Ajax through the Shah's repressive regime and the Islamic revolution to the fireballs that engulfed the World Trade Center in New York."
Kinzer has written a remarkable new book, All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror (Wiley, 2003).
In it, he documents step by step, how Roosevelt, the Dulles boys and Norman Schwarzkopf Sr., among a host of others, took down a democratically elected regime in Iran.
They had freedom of the press. We shut it down.
They had democracy. And we crushed it.
Mossadegh was the beacon of hope for the Middle East.
If democracy were allowed to take hold in Iran, it probably would have spread throughout the Middle East.
We asked Kinzer “what does the overthrow of Mossadegh say about the United States respect for democracy abroad?”
"Imagine today what it must sound like to Iranians to hear American leaders tell them – ‘We want you to have a democracy in Iran, we disapprove of your present government, we wish to help you bring democracy to your country.' Naturally, they roll their eyes and say -- "We had a democracy once, but you crushed it,'" he said. "This shows how differently other people perceive us from the way we perceive ourselves. We think of ourselves as paladins of democracy. But actually, in Iran, we destroyed the last democratic regime the country ever had and set them on a road to what has been half a century of dictatorship."
After ousting Mossadegh, the United States put in place a brutal Shah who destroyed dissent and tortured the dissenters.
And the Shah begat the Islamic revolution.
During that Islamic revolution in 1979, Iranians held up Mossadegh's picture, telling the world “ we want a democratic regime that resists foreign influence and respects the will of the Iranian people as expressed through democratic institutions.”
"They were never able to achieve that. And this has led many Iranians to react very poignantly to my book," Kaizer told us. "One woman sent me an e-mail that said ‘I was in tears when I finished your book because it made me think of all we lost and all we could have had.'"
Of course, the overthrow of Mossadegh was only one of the first U.S. coups of democratically elected regime. (To see one in movie form, pick up a copy of Raoul Peck's Lumumba, now on DVD.)
Kinzer's previous books include Bitter Fruit: The Story of the American Coup in Guatemala.
He's thinking of putting together a boxed set of his books on American coups.
Get copies of Bitter Fruit and All The Shah's Men.
Read them.
And the next time a politician talks about spreading democracy around the globe, ask them about Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran, Patrice Lumumba in the Congo, and Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala.
Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter, http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Multinational Monitor. They are co-authors of Corporate Predators: The Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press; http://www.corporatepredators.org).
ooops, it looks like the format didn't hold too well.
I fail to see the author's logic about this. Ok so the UK dissolved an elected leader in Iran? And this would of stopped the Mullahs from taking over eventually how? In fact they might have acted sooner.
We dissolved an elected leader in Iran.
By we, of course, I mean the Eisenhower administration.
Even if this guy is right, which I don't know if he is or not, bad behavior doesn't justify more bad behavior.
Oh, and a LOT of things would be better in the Middle East had Carter not sold out the Shaw of Iran.
Read this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Mossadegh
The operation wasn't entirely unjustified.
Not necessarily. The Shah in Iran was a brutal tyrant, and the coup of Mossadegh in 1953 only showed Iranians that a democratic, liberal, independent leader was too weak to stand up to the United States and the UK, and only a fascist dictator could keep Iran independent.
The logic this article uses is that if there were no coup in Iran, the Shah never would have taken absolute power in Iran, and there never would have been an Islamic Revolution. The book, All the Shah's Men, is a good one, and I highly reccomend it.
Not it was not entirely unjustified, but the events of history has shown it to be a collosal failure. That doesn't mean we have to apologize for something that happened 50 years ago, it's just a long gone mistake in history we still feel the effects from today.
The author makes a fallacious and erroneous argument that somehow all of those events in the past are the mistakes of the present administration.
The President isn't outlining what we did, but what we're going to do. The President has basically put out for the world to see a comprehensive agenda to promote freedom, thereby preventing the realpolitik of the past from re-exerting itself in a similar manner.
Realpolitik is the tool of the weak. When a man acts with the full force of moral justification, and with the strength of an entire nation of willing and informed citizens - that nation can overcome just about anything.
Being able to set aside your morals to achieve a goal is not a sign of strength, it is a sign of a fundamental weakness of character.
Lumumba was entirely different from Mossadegh, and I have to side with you on that one.
Since every almost sentence, or even sentence fragment, seems to warrant its own paragraph.
Like this.
Or this.
It gets annoying.
And by the way, they really should learn how to spell the Secretary of State's first name. Getting that wrong, in the first sentence especially, tends to make the reader discount whatever follows.
Which, in this case, would be a wise decision.
What's the point here?
Just, golly. Get over yourselves Bob and Russ. If you want to see a republic being turned into tyranny, you don't have to look much further than WA state, and an entire Dem apparatus, from the highest judiciary on down, willing to promote massive vote fraud and stuffing the ballot box in order to put their candidate in office - in 2005 (not 1935, 2005).
Hahaha.... Isn't this the Soviet-installed communist dictator of Iran??? Hahahaha....
I never understood those sorts of arguments. "We did something stupid in the past...let's keep on doing it that way!"
Duhr!
No he was the democratically elected Moderate Prime Minister of Iran.
Your point?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.