Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Number Theorist May Have Proposed a Solution to the Landau-Siegel Zeros Conjecture (Mathematician Who Solved Prime-Number Riddle Claims)
Phys.org ^ | https://phys.org/news/2022-11-theorist-solution-landau-siegel-zeros-conjecture.html#:~:text=Mathemat | Bob Yirka

Posted on 11/17/2022 3:39:30 PM PST by nickcarraway

Yitang Zhang, a number theorist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, has posted a paper on arXiv that hints at the possibility that he may have solved the Landau-Siegel zeros conjecture. The paper has not yet been validated by anyone else at this time, and Zhang himself has yet to explain the purpose or even meaning of his paper.

The paper posted by Zhang is not in a traditional format. There is no introduction or summation, or even any sort of explanation of its contents. Instead, it is a proof—a very long proof, 111 pages of math. Zahn does imply that his work is related to the Landau-Siegel zeros conjecture, however, and also implies in the title that it involves discrete estimates. The Landau-Siegel zeros conjecture is a sort of potential counterexample to the Riemann Hypothesis, which is theorized to predict the probability that numbers in a certain range are prime numbers.

Zhang is considered to be somewhat of an eccentric person. He was born and raised in China, and earned a master's degree at Peking University. He then moved to the United States where he earned a Ph.D. in math at Purdue University. But for unknown reasons, he was unable to get a job in his field, instead working a variety of menial labor jobs until finally landing a position at the University of New Hampshire. While there, Zhang toiled away on his own time for several years and then published what he'd been working on in 2013—the twin prime conjecture, which proposed that there are infinite pairs of prime numbers that differ by two.

The paper was considered a major breakthrough and made Zhang a celebrity of sorts in the math world. He has apparently been working on the Landau-Siegel zeros conjecture for many years. In 2007, he posted a paper about it as a preprint, but there were problems with the work, and it was never published in a peer-reviewed journal.

It will likely be some time before others finish reviewing Zhang's paper and offer commentary. And it is not clear if Zhang himself will comment publicly, although he is scheduled to present his paper to colleagues at Peking University sometime in the near future.

More information: Yitang Zhang, Discrete mean estimates and the Landau-Siegel zero, arXiv (2022). DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.02515

Journal information: arXiv


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; Science
KEYWORDS: landausiegalszero; landausiegalzeros; math; mathematicalproof; yitangzhang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2022 3:39:30 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I can’t believe this guy published first. Now all my work on this will have been for nothing.


2 posted on 11/17/2022 3:42:40 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (We are already in a revolutionary period, and the Rule of Law means nothing. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This is so far beyond me...


3 posted on 11/17/2022 3:42:45 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

On page 83, about halfway down, he misstated an exponent. Complete fail.


4 posted on 11/17/2022 3:48:27 PM PST by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Big deal. My cat Mr. Whiskers solved the Landau-Siegel zeros conjecture problem years ago. He just got too busy chasing his tail to publish it.


5 posted on 11/17/2022 3:49:06 PM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
He only thinks that he’s solved it.

You still have time. :-D

6 posted on 11/17/2022 3:49:12 PM PST by pax_et_bonum (God is good, He loves us, and He is always with us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

He was the guy sitting behind you in class copying your paper. You can get him for plagiarism.


7 posted on 11/17/2022 3:53:13 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“may have proposed”

Shouldn’t the writer have determined that before writing the article? What a retard.


8 posted on 11/17/2022 3:59:26 PM PST by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Whatever numbers with exponents.

Subtract the number 1

Suddenly it is indivisible, and there is justice for all


9 posted on 11/17/2022 4:00:51 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

It’s all Greek to me...


10 posted on 11/17/2022 4:07:48 PM PST by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Now I can get some rest. I was awake all night trying to figure it out.


11 posted on 11/17/2022 4:10:34 PM PST by I want the USA back (Our news media isn't worth camel spit. Neither is the democrat party. H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

… an infinite number of primes that differ by 2.
++++
Well they have to be odd so they can’t differ by 1. The same argument says they can’t differ by 3. Clearly that applies to 5, 7, 9, 11 … as well.

But there are a lot of primes. An infinite number I believe. So differing by 2 would seem to be relatively common at least as primes go. Seems likely there are an infinite number of them.

My more simple “proof”. 😎


12 posted on 11/17/2022 4:14:25 PM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

OK, what does this mean IRL, the advancement of crypto keys or in decoding?


13 posted on 11/17/2022 4:33:36 PM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

OK fine, but can he complete a Rubic’s cube in under 5 minutes?


14 posted on 11/17/2022 4:36:15 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
"Landau-Siegel zeros conjecture"

Who knew that Martin and Bugsy even knew each other?


15 posted on 11/17/2022 4:39:00 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

An odd duo, but they just loved Math...


16 posted on 11/17/2022 4:45:10 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Chode

It has no practical application.

There are some things people believe are true. One can just assume they’re true, so demonstrating that they are true has no effect.


17 posted on 11/17/2022 4:52:39 PM PST by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Wasn’t this a episode on Netflix?


18 posted on 11/17/2022 4:59:20 PM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TTFX

“It has no practical application”

Yet


19 posted on 11/17/2022 5:04:33 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The problem with 111 page proofs, is how do you prove the proof is correct?


20 posted on 11/17/2022 5:09:22 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (The rot of all principle begins with a single compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson