Posted on 08/11/2018 10:01:38 PM PDT by ransomnote
FWIW, the Glomar Explorer was sold for a pretty good chunk of change ~ 2013/14 IIRC and then shipped of to China for scrap in 2015 (which I thought odd).
It, or a similar constructed ship, could service a long endurance non nuclear sub without its (the sub) needing to surface.
On the whole, it seems there is a distinct visual difference between people pursuing evil and those not, or who have forsaken it.
NAS = Naval Air Station
Tom Cullen ;-)
Well that makes sense if the Deep State wants to stay deep enough to avoid detection, subs being so hard to hide from satellites ‘n all.
Per NBC?
Hahahaha.
A VERY, VERY bad week.
Yup, too funny!
CCat
I am lost in pop culture, I just learned one last week, throwing shade around I think means saying something to a group of people instead of talking to the one person they want to get the message to, if the message isn’t about you, you say stop throwing shade on around, I think anyway lol
Looks like you’re up for the job Gunner.
Yeah I know the guy on the net provided the other translation
Image result for throwing shadewww.dictionary.com The expressions "throw shade, "throwing shade", or simply "shade", are slang terms used to describe insults. Merriam-Webster defines "shade" as "subtle, sneering expression of contempt for or disgust with someonesometimes verbal, and sometimes not" .
That was the implication.
You’ll need more BET.
There’s no way the Trump team didn’t know about the Omarosa-Duncan “problem” when they hired her.
She was hired for a purpose.
I was thinking along the lines of either the appointer being unqualified to have made the appointment or the appointee having falsified credentialing.
Like when first Co I worked at found out a VP did not have claimed degrees/experience and was booking bid/proposal $ as revenue for the purpose of obtaining financing...
Never mind. I apologize. I just read it again. You don’t say what I thought you said.
I’ll shut up now.
I read recently that it was based on Chapman, and was surprised. It is so good at recreating the atmoshere of the 80s, and accurately depicting the events, it seems like it could be a real story from the 80s. There were a few unrealistic events towards the end (Soviet diplomat assassinated in DC during talks, that would have been a major crisis) but all in all, as a person who studied US-Soviet relations and then worked in Congress on foreign affairs during the 80s, it was very true to life and brought back lots of memories. Those were very exciting times. I imagine there were spies there who were doing similar things then, even if not based on an actual person.
Werent or were?
Johnsmom said:
BOOM! This is BIG.
The tick tock in the article reminded me of Q posts 325, 542, and 1203.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I had a similar reaction, Johnsmom! GMTA?!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.