Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ion Thruster for Future Mars Mission Breaks Records
Real Clear Science ^ | 14 Oct, 2017 | Tereza Pultarova

Posted on 10/14/2017 12:24:08 PM PDT by MtnClimber

A thruster that's being developed for a future NASA mission to Mars broke several records during recent tests, suggesting that the technology is on track to take humans to the Red Planet within the next 20 years, project team members said.

The X3 thruster, which was designed by researchers at the University of Michigan in cooperation with NASA and the U.S. Air Force, is a Hall thruster — a system that propels spacecraft by accelerating a stream of electrically charged atoms, known as ions. In the recent demonstration conducted at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Ohio, the X3 broke records for the maximum power output, thrust and operating current achieved by a Hall thruster to date, according to the research team at the University of Michigan and representatives from NASA.

"We have shown that X3 can operate at over 100 kW of power," said Alec Gallimore, who is leading the project, in an interview with Space.com. "It operated at a huge range of power from 5 kW to 102 kW, with electrical current of up to 260 amperes. It generated 5.4 Newtons of thrust, which is the highest level of thrust achieved by any plasma thruster to date," added Gallimore, who is dean of engineering at the University of Michigan. The previous record was 3.3 Newtons, according to the school.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearscience.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: mars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: TexasGator

Yes, I read that, too. But we’re talking hundreds of KWs to power that thing. And current up to 260 amperes! How many square miles of solar panels can they put on a space vehicle? That’s got to generate HEAT. How will they cool the circuitry? How greatly do they embellish their progress to keep the grant money pouring in?


41 posted on 10/14/2017 1:19:51 PM PDT by Tucker39 (Read: Psalm 145. The whole psalm.....aloud; as praise to our God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Well, I think some genius is going to figure out a way where they can go full acceleration 3/4 of the way there and start slowing down and completing the flight by gravity breaking around mars or/and one of it’s moons.

You ask me, mars is interesting, but a large asteroid might have a bigger payoff.


42 posted on 10/14/2017 1:20:08 PM PDT by Fhios (Down with your fascism, up with our fascism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

So it can get to Mars in 100 years.


43 posted on 10/14/2017 1:26:59 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

“Yes, I read that, too. But we’re talking hundreds of KWs to power that thing. And current up to 260 amperes! How many square miles of solar panels can they put on a space vehicle? That’s got to generate HEAT. How will they cool the circuitry? How greatly do they embellish their progress to keep the grant money pouring in?”

Our probes are getting 300 watts/meter squared thus 100kw would require about 333 meters squared or about a 10 by 33 meter size (35 x 100 feet).

As for heat, space is very very cold!


44 posted on 10/14/2017 1:32:04 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

“So it can get to Mars in 100 years.”

After six weeks it will be traveling one million miles per day.


45 posted on 10/14/2017 1:36:44 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“I wonder if you have to start slowing down when you are half way there?”

Yes and no. If you have some type of friction braking when you get there, like dragging a chute through the very thin Mars atmosphere or a heat shield, then you won’t need to slow down nearly as much before you get there. Same on the return.


46 posted on 10/14/2017 1:45:02 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Thanks again. I think I’ll hide and watch.


47 posted on 10/14/2017 1:49:38 PM PDT by Tucker39 (Read: Psalm 145. The whole psalm.....aloud; as praise to our God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

That’s about 2.5 pounds of thrust.


48 posted on 10/14/2017 2:17:58 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Next year, the team will run an even bigger test, which aims to prove that the thruster can operate at full power for 100 hours. Gallimore said the engineers are also designing a special magnetic shielding system that would keep the plasma away from the walls of the thruster to prevent damage and enable the thruster to operate reliably for even longer periods of time. Gallimore said that without the shielding a flight version X3 would probably start experiencing problems after several thousand hours of operations.

In addition, there is the problem of generating 500 kw of power. At 20 watts per square foot it would require a massive solar array.


49 posted on 10/14/2017 2:26:22 PM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (Proudly casting a heavy carbon footprint as I clean my guns ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

I would assume that nuclear power will be used to power the half megawatt rated ion thrusters.


50 posted on 10/14/2017 3:07:13 PM PDT by tony549 (Stuck in SoCal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Macroscope. Piers Anthony.


51 posted on 10/14/2017 3:36:34 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Combine it with a RTG source put it into space and set a record in a month. Why don’t we push the boundaries anymore.

Build a probe just to push the envelope with a this with a RTG and a big ping antenna. Slingshot it out of the solar system.


52 posted on 10/14/2017 3:37:57 PM PDT by wgmalabama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Yep. SM was a fairly nice model.


53 posted on 10/14/2017 3:37:57 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wgmalabama

I wonder about what the average distance would be before a spacecraft hit something big enough to damage it.


54 posted on 10/14/2017 3:50:49 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
Regular Newtons or Fig Newtons?

Big Fig Newtons...


55 posted on 10/14/2017 3:56:30 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (For 'tis the sport to have the engineer hoist with his own petard., -- Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 60Gunner

Citroen 2CV

A Deux Chevaux!

My 1st auto
Unique and fun...
...and yes I was a hippy :)


56 posted on 10/14/2017 3:57:53 PM PDT by kanawa (Trump Loves a Great Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Any idea what the ions being used are?


57 posted on 10/14/2017 8:00:08 PM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
"Weighs 500lbs and only generates 5 Newton’s of thrust."

~~~~~~

Actually, it.s 5.4 Newtons which equals a whole 1.214 lbf...

Somehow, for 102 kW, with electrical current of up to 260 amperes, a little over a pound of thrust doesn't seem too exciting.

Of course, I guess one has to ask, "What is the reaction mass consumption at that 1.214 lbf level?

58 posted on 10/15/2017 12:52:03 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias | "Islamists": Satan's assassins | "Moderate Muslims": Useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 60Gunner
But first you have to overcome mass. The thing will accelerate like a Citroen 2CV loaded with six fat hippies.

The momentum once that thing gets moving though, it's gonna be unstoppable! (ROFL!)

59 posted on 10/15/2017 1:04:47 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Somehow, for 102 kW, with electrical current of up to 260 amperes, a little over a pound of thrust doesn't seem too exciting.

In outer space, there is no friction. That means all of the thrust goes toward accelerating the vehicle. It just goes faster and faster. If the thrust can be maintained over a long period of time, all you need is patience, and you will be traveling really fast.

60 posted on 10/15/2017 1:05:01 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson