Skip to comments.
Questions: Why are all links to FR posts deleted at Google?
June 23, 2017
| me
Posted on 06/22/2017 10:32:01 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster
This question has been asked so many times it belongs in the FAQ.
FR used to do an external linking thing which used an interstitial page that forwarded you to the target page. That’s what you’re seeing the remnants of in those searches.
Current content is still indexed as it should be. Ex: https://www.google.com/search?q=%2Bsite:freerepublic.com+%2Brand
To: thoughtomator
killjoy. that had real potential.
To: JohnBrowdie
Ha ok next time I will wait until 100 hysterical we’re-being-censored posts are on the thread before enlightening the crowd.
To: thoughtomator
Or, “What an evil Google.”
Google’s management doubtless does think FR is evil, but also considers it important enough to watch. Glorify God. It could be worse.
Old FR content is still remembered, even. Google for “Rednecks Built America.”
5
posted on
06/22/2017 10:54:31 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
It’s a conspiracy. The pancake bunny and the aw shit guy are working it from the inside. The NSA is on to all of us.
To: thoughtomator
I miss the old cache function
That died after the clowns and the other stupids
7
posted on
06/22/2017 11:16:12 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Eff You I'm Millwall!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I dropped in Google today. well
then
8
posted on
06/22/2017 11:26:13 PM PDT
by
onona
(i don't know what the reticent is)
To: thoughtomator
I didn't see that little text search window as recent as a few weeks ago. Is that a new feature Google offers?
9
posted on
06/22/2017 11:27:11 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Googling for
"small text window" "dropped in google" returns two hits.
Both hits refer to the same web page, but one uses the domain name and one the IP address. Strange that the second one shows up.
10
posted on
06/22/2017 11:35:43 PM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: Vermont Lt
11
posted on
06/22/2017 11:35:54 PM PDT
by
TXBlair
(We will not forget Benghazi.)
To: thoughtomator
Ha ok next time I will wait until 100 hysterical were-being-censored posts are on the thread before enlightening the crowd.
yeah, see? I feel genuinely deprived. let this be a lesson for all of us.
think, people. think !!!
To: TigerLikesRooster
I been using goduckygo but they don’t seem to have a different filter.
13
posted on
06/22/2017 11:38:04 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: TigerLikesRooster
I don’t see anything unusual; then again I don’t let Google run their nasty little pieces of Javascript on my machines, except where necessary for business purposes and then only in a tightly controlled environment.
As an IT professional, I simply don’t give out authorization to run programs on my computer except on a need-to-have basis. Decades later it’s still stunning to me that people allow unknown sources to run arbitrary code on their computers.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Been wondering the same thing lately.
I can’t use Google anymore to search articles I wrote in the past or posts...
15
posted on
06/22/2017 11:51:00 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
To: thoughtomator
Many people are ignorant or unconcerned about those issues. Furthermore, when tech giants like Google push this kind of practice, people find it hard to avoid them. This is even true for relatively computer-savvy folks.
If you raise issues like this, they tend to view it as mindless obsession of some techie nuts.
16
posted on
06/22/2017 11:52:00 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
17
posted on
06/22/2017 11:53:26 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I’m simply ahead of the curve. The day will come when even the average consumer sees the importance of having a virtual condom wrapping up network activity. Poke holes at your own risk!
To: thoughtomator
With Google, use the syntax "site:"
Camille Paglia => search all web
Camille Paglia site:http://www.freerepublic.com/ => search only on freerepublic.com
19
posted on
06/23/2017 12:35:11 AM PDT
by
miniTAX
(ay)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I just searched
“dropped in Google today. In the past, I could find articles posted at Freerepublic using a keyword search”
on google and this thread comes up.
20
posted on
06/23/2017 12:38:19 AM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson