Posted on 03/25/2017 6:25:45 PM PDT by Whenifhow
Judge Jeanine Live Thread
Videos added as available.
Adding - in the letter, Klayman states that Montgomery was interviewed by the FBI a couple of years ago.
Image
http://imgur.com/a/ZEVdb
pdf
http://www.freedomwatchusa.org/pdf/170321-Final%20Whistleblower%20Letter.pdf
Not sure how many people have seen this interview:
Note the date - 2/15 - Klayman is on fox business
6:11 Minutes
NSA spying on the Trump administration?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQcC7nivswc
Published on Feb 15, 2017
Freedom Watch founder Larry Klayman on whether the NSA is tapping phones in the White House.
Placemark.
At sign-off she said there’s another Judge Jeanine program tomorrow night (Sunday) - will this be a re-run or do you think...?
**
Sometimes the entire program is a repeat, but have also seen where there are new segments, but the opening statement is a repeat.
As mentioned upthread “it seems like this is a story that would be reported by James Rosen, Brit Hume, Bret Baier” and that seems more likely than Judge Jeanine.
Hostage has mentioned a lawsuit coming so that would keep it in the news.
George Webb has for a while now, prepared the audience for things to break “soon”.
Important placemark.
bookmark
You weren’t the only one fooled.
It’s not your fault.
Frankly, the fact that there integrating adult illegal immigrants into the high schools was quite the bombshell for me. Maybe you all are aware of this, but I sure wasn’t. I’d be flipping out if this was going on in my kid’s school.
Just watched George Webb’s three updates for Day 153 and he too was clearly expecting this to break tonight on JJ. And I don’t think he based that strictly on reading it on FR ;-)
So, we wait. In fact, keeping things quiet for investigative purposes is vastly more important than satisfying our curiousity, if that’s the reason.
Thanks - it sure feels like it, but I saw it mentioned on the other thread it was all over social media.
He, like Ryan, should be gone. Let them go back to Wisconsin.
Don’t mix the Montgomery stuff with what Nunes has - Montgomery’s is from a couple of years (or more) back, while Nunes is talking about this past Nov. thru Jan. It seems doubtful that Nunes’ whistleblower is Montgomery.
**
That is a very good point. Things go at a “Trump Train pace” and we forget to check again on the timeline.
Klayman wrote the letter to the intelligence committee about Montgomery, but Nunes said it was during the transition.
Exactly right!
Nunes has someone else.
Good point. The really significant (as in mind-numbingly off-the-charts significant) is Montgomery’s claim that the CIA or it’s contractors collected all this data without warrnts. To me that sounds like not just jail for Clapper, Brennan, and a lot of other people, but about 100X bigger than Watergate. Of course there has to be proof and if Montgomery is lying, or exaggerating, or has lost the data or dies without producing it - that would probably be the end of it.
I was not aware of this. And yes, this was a bombshell for me. Insanity!
I think Nunes accidentally hit the whole nerve center/aorta of surveillance and tied about 20 major crimes together.
Maybe Jeff told him to slow down, don’t convert our dragnet into a 50KT Nuke just right now.
Sorry, I can’t accept that letter/’report’ for any value of getting to the truth. If anything it only further illustrates La Raza’s lawyer’s pursuit of anything to throw against Arpaio.
Red flags of bias in the write-up are frequently observed in a cursory reading:
Non-existent plot,
absurd,
bizarre conspiracy,
paranoid minds,
civil rights case Melendres v. Arpaio,
Federal Judge G. Murray Snow,
ludicrous investigation of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate,
Montgomery a ‘swindler’ (but was hired back; uh-huh)
These descriptors are not professional; they are indicators of unprofessional name-calling.
There is also posted of the Arpaio timeline FROM THE COURT, and that is the only item of value that I see precisely because it originates from the court and not someone’s ranting behavior. People’s rants hold no value to me. The timeline has, however, nothing to incriminate Arpaio, so it’s unclear why it was posted.
In sum, the letter is of no value.
Trump put out a tweet this AM to be sure and watch Janine tonight!!! I think he sent his message about RYAN through Janine!! Trump can’t let Ryan know he has his number because of Pence and Rience being such good friends of his!!!!
That’s probably it. His response on camera after the bill was pulled was perfect, measured and calm.
I think it clearly shows that they feel threatened and used these flimsy arguments to discredit Arpaio and anyone associated with Mongtomery.
If Montgomery pulled back on the expose with Cameron/Fox News, it’s likely because he wasn’t able to get immunity. The whole scheme they discussed about getting immunity in AZ sounded extremely hokey and weak. I don’t blame Montgomery for holding back because without immunity they’d raid his house, take everything, and wreck his life, however much he has left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.