[bigbob]

Good point. The really significant (as in mind-numbingly off-the-charts significant) is Montgomery’s claim that the CIA or it’s contractors collected all this data without warrnts. To me that sounds like not just jail for Clapper, Brennan, and a lot of other people, but about 100X bigger than Watergate. Of course there has to be proof and if Montgomery is lying, or exaggerating, or has lost the data or dies without producing it - that would probably be the end of it.

[Major Matt Mason]

I listened to some of the recordings of Blixeth (or whatever his name is), Arpaio and Zullo when they first met to talk about what Montgomery had. If - and that is a big IF - the info is valid, one item that stuck out to me was when they talked about Clapper asking Montgomery to hack info from the voter rolls in FL in 2008. That immediately made me think of the 2016 election and DHS trying to access Georgia's Sec. of State server for unexplained reasons. The election night results for GA, which was never going to be in Hillary's column, were held up far longer than they needed to be by the media. Same with TX (they should check their servers if they haven't yet done so), which Hillary's camp was claiming would be close. Might be signs that some shenanigans were going on that thankfully didn't work out.