Sorry, I can’t accept that letter/’report’ for any value of getting to the truth. If anything it only further illustrates La Raza’s lawyer’s pursuit of anything to throw against Arpaio.
Red flags of bias in the write-up are frequently observed in a cursory reading:
Non-existent plot,
absurd,
bizarre conspiracy,
paranoid minds,
civil rights case Melendres v. Arpaio,
Federal Judge G. Murray Snow,
ludicrous investigation of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate,
Montgomery a ‘swindler’ (but was hired back; uh-huh)
These descriptors are not professional; they are indicators of unprofessional name-calling.
There is also posted of the Arpaio timeline FROM THE COURT, and that is the only item of value that I see precisely because it originates from the court and not someone’s ranting behavior. People’s rants hold no value to me. The timeline has, however, nothing to incriminate Arpaio, so it’s unclear why it was posted.
In sum, the letter is of no value.
I think it clearly shows that they feel threatened and used these flimsy arguments to discredit Arpaio and anyone associated with Mongtomery.
If Montgomery pulled back on the expose with Cameron/Fox News, it’s likely because he wasn’t able to get immunity. The whole scheme they discussed about getting immunity in AZ sounded extremely hokey and weak. I don’t blame Montgomery for holding back because without immunity they’d raid his house, take everything, and wreck his life, however much he has left.