Don’t mix the Montgomery stuff with what Nunes has - Montgomery’s is from a couple of years (or more) back, while Nunes is talking about this past Nov. thru Jan. It seems doubtful that Nunes’ whistleblower is Montgomery.
**
That is a very good point. Things go at a “Trump Train pace” and we forget to check again on the timeline.
Klayman wrote the letter to the intelligence committee about Montgomery, but Nunes said it was during the transition.
Exactly right!
Nunes has someone else.
Good point. The really significant (as in mind-numbingly off-the-charts significant) is Montgomery’s claim that the CIA or it’s contractors collected all this data without warrnts. To me that sounds like not just jail for Clapper, Brennan, and a lot of other people, but about 100X bigger than Watergate. Of course there has to be proof and if Montgomery is lying, or exaggerating, or has lost the data or dies without producing it - that would probably be the end of it.