Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Detroit Voter Fraud so Extensive Half of Initial Votes Ineligible for Recount…
Conservative Treehouse ^ | 6 Dec, 2016 | Sundance

Posted on 12/06/2016 5:38:03 PM PST by MtnClimber

If anyone thought a Michigan ballot recount was going to end up being a net positive for Hillary Clinton, they are intellectually disconnected from understanding the reality of how fraudulent the most democrat precincts are in Wayne County (Detroit) Michigan.

Election laws put into place specifically to protect the fraud, and ensure the manipulative discoveries are never identified, now mean the votes cannot be recounted.

← Likely Trump Rally In Louisiana To Support John Kennedy Senate Bid…Report: Kris Kobach and General Kelly Likely DHS Nominees… → Detroit Voter Fraud so Extensive Half of Initial Votes Ineligible for Recount… Posted on December 6, 2016 by sundance If anyone thought a Michigan ballot recount was going to end up being a net positive for Hillary Clinton, they are intellectually disconnected from understanding the reality of how fraudulent the most democrat precincts are in Wayne County (Detroit) Michigan.

Election laws put into place specifically to protect the fraud, and ensure the manipulative discoveries are never identified, now mean the votes cannot be recounted.

detroit-elections-1

MICHIGAN – One-third of precincts in Wayne County could be disqualified from an unprecedented statewide recount of presidential election results because of problems with ballots.

Michigan’s largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.

Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.

According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: detroit; elections; hillary; michigan; recount; stein; trump; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: MtnClimber

We should check all of the big places that went for Hillary in the entire country. In Virginia, I would like to see Richmond, Norfolk, Fairfax county, and a few more places, like Portsmouth and areas in the DC beltway.


41 posted on 12/06/2016 6:18:16 PM PST by Carry me back (Cut the feds by 90%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boop
Very good.

I hope Trump's people see your post.

42 posted on 12/06/2016 6:18:54 PM PST by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: manc

We need to do this and correct the problem now. The dems really are the minority party.


43 posted on 12/06/2016 6:20:04 PM PST by Carry me back (Cut the feds by 90%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: manc

In New Mexico we’ve pretty much eliminated election day fraud. It’s voting by illegals, multiple voting by absentee ballots to a single address, dead people voting. It’s easier for a person to vote in multiple locations as they have dropped precinct voting and voting is done in several convenience locations around the county. They don’t require ID, just name address and DOB.

The new Democrat SOS will work to continue this as she vows to make sure everyone votes while denying there is voter fraud.


44 posted on 12/06/2016 6:26:48 PM PST by CedarDave (Proud member of Hillary's Deplorables class of 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Pfffft. You kidding? They will only scream louder and demand the double extra-sooper recount and will put up a GoFundMe page to pay for it. And get funded.


45 posted on 12/06/2016 6:30:50 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
Because he voter cards were fed into the computer scanning device multiple times...so generating additional counts in the computer that are not related to the total count from the vote box.

Yep.

46 posted on 12/06/2016 6:31:08 PM PST by MarMema ("you can't make up...a constitutional right to a recount" Beloved Mi AG Bill Schuette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: XEHRpa

Yep.


47 posted on 12/06/2016 6:31:58 PM PST by MarMema ("you can't make up...a constitutional right to a recount" Beloved Mi AG Bill Schuette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

Yeah, but a Norma Jean Gonzalez could probably vote three times.

Per county.


48 posted on 12/06/2016 6:32:25 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: meyer

If Police can be forced to wear cameras so can Precincts...video tape it all.


49 posted on 12/06/2016 6:34:03 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Music to a free nstion


50 posted on 12/06/2016 6:34:05 PM PST by EBH (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meyer

New rules will be needed but if nobody goes to jail, there will be no deterrent.


51 posted on 12/06/2016 6:36:07 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Wayne does not want a recount. The mother lode of fraud would be
exposed. People would go to jail.


52 posted on 12/06/2016 6:42:08 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer

We are talking about voter fraud, when we should be talking about election fraud.


53 posted on 12/06/2016 7:21:06 PM PST by gogeo (That's my Trumpy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: manc

“I’d like to see the votes in CA, NV, NH, NM, CO, all looked at, and then put against the voter rolls to see how may dead, and illegals voted.”

Me too! Especially here in New Mexico.


54 posted on 12/06/2016 7:22:54 PM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

“This year the Trump victory was so overwhelming they couldn’t manufacture enough votes to offset Trump’s totals.”

Without all the fraud giving votes to Hillary, the results would’ve been a landslide for Trump.


55 posted on 12/06/2016 7:30:12 PM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

“In New Mexico we’ve pretty much eliminated election day fraud.”

I’m not as confident as you are about that. I still believe that tabulator machines in certain areas are being programmed for fractional counting. The only way to be certain they’re not is to do some hand counts once the polls close for comparisons. It should be made an option available to the poll workers under set guidelines and protocol.


56 posted on 12/06/2016 7:37:21 PM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

This is too good to be true, even with voter fraud, Hitlery lost. Now with rules they put in place that prevent a recount, they can’t further cheat to get her in.

It’s a case of unintended consequences.

It’s just fun seeing Hitlery lose over and over, every time she turns around.

Now if we can get her a jury trial for some of her crimes, the leftists will just go ape$hit.


57 posted on 12/06/2016 7:46:18 PM PST by redfreedom (The nation has been saved. Thank you Dear Lord. Long live President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Why was this not caught on the first count?


58 posted on 12/06/2016 8:22:49 PM PST by dgbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dgbrown
Why was this not caught on the first count?

Corruption is common. In the last election here in Colorado there were around 10 counties that had votes over 100% over registered voters. This election the precinct that covers the liberal Aspen, CO had Democrats at 105% over registration and Republicans at 105% over registration. Want to wager if the excess republicans also voted for Hillary?

59 posted on 12/06/2016 9:26:06 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

“Demonicrats.” I used that phrase many years ago on Free Republic and it was actually picked up by the media at the time on Fox News except I spelled in DemonicRats. Apparently Fox News found it amusing.

In reality the Main Stream Media and Fox read Free Republic. We are normally a day or two ahead of the news. Even if they disagree or agree they are looking for good analysis of the news so they can support the analysis but in the case of the MSM discount our views. Our views can be bizarre and wrong or mostly very correct. They do not like us but they do read us.


60 posted on 12/07/2016 12:16:55 AM PST by cpdiii (DECKHAND, ROUGHNECK, GEOLOGIST, PILOT, PHARMACIST, LIBERTARIAN The Constitution is worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson