Posted on 12/06/2016 5:38:03 PM PST by MtnClimber
This recount could really hurt the ‘RATs. Their voter fraud will be exposed in the recount.
If they can’t be REcounted, why are they counted to begin with?
so much for the socialist libtard lie vote fraud doesnt exist.
“socialosts”
Behold, he travails with wickedness, and he conceives mischief and brings forth falsehood.
He has dug a pit and hollowed it out, and has fallen into the hole which he has made.
“According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.”
Gotta protect the machine you know.
I bet that that is why WJC really did not want to go into recount territory, eh?
Won’t hurt them at all
All the ballots that were scanned for multiple machine votes? The machine vote was certified and will remain. So she keeps her fraud total ... At least now we have an idea what they do and how much
I’d like to see the votes in CA, NV, NH, NM, CO, all looked at, and then put against the voter rolls to see how may dead, and illegals voted.
If Trump’s election does nothing else, I hope it moves the Supreme Court in the right direction and voting procedures can be cleaned up.
Excellent question! Sounds like there is a one count limit to bogus/illegal/forged ballots.
Yes, absolutely, but as a retrospective (after the inauguration, and as a major reason for tightening vote and voter security.)
That’s why I hoped we’d embrace their call of “ensuring fair elections” wholeheartedly. There are many more hotbeds of Rat fraud to be exposed.
If they can’t be REcounted, why are they counted to begin with?
—
Voter fraud?
It would be a very good idea to subpoena the ballots and voter rolls from the precincts in question, so that the amount of mismatch can be studied further. If it's like 1 or 2 votes, probably not a problem. If it's 50 or 100, well then, that may be fraud staring us in the face.
Of course, there will be no way to pin this on any individual (or will there) but it will illustrate the issue in no uncertain terms. This will support voter ID and other major steps to ensure the sanctity of the LEGAL ballots cast by American citizens.
I wonder if in California, ones like Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Dinah Shore, Betty Grable, Jane Russell, and other late great Hollywood Republicans have been reliably voting Democrat these last number of years? Marilyn Monroe was a liberal and I’d dare say casting a ballot under her name would be a bit too obvious.
If they can’t be REcounted, why are they counted to begin with?
How can you disenfranchise those poor people???? Hater!!! /s
Where is my puppy??
The article is implying that the law was passed to protect the [obviously leftist] intentionally fraudulent vote count.
It couldn't happen to a more wretched hive of scum and villainy than the Demonicrats.
Agreed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.