Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/19/2016 7:52:47 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3482451/posts



Skip to comments.

Debate Closing (vanity)

Posted on 10/19/2016 7:36:51 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

Trump won hands down. She looked depressed and Trump was fresh and vibrant.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: chat; notnews; seebreakingnews; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: RooRoobird20

Sorry abou the triple post. I wished Trump would gone after harder when she told ridiculous whopper lies. The crap about Putin being behind Wikileaks was laughable. Since when did Cankles care about real cybersecurity?


21 posted on 10/19/2016 7:44:54 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 (Cradle Democrat Hispanic woman, left the party in 1993 because of the Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

He reduced sniffing.

His body language was more controlled.

At the VERY end he was stupid and didn’t plaster on a huge smile, acte like a winner, and charge over to falsely shake her hand. It would have looked Presidential. That was maybe the ONE stupid slip-up he did.

I thought it was sort of a draw.

The moderator was not as unfair as I predicted.

He really won #2 pretty clearly, and....I was hoping for that this time but it wasn’t a drubbing as I’d hoped.

When circulating in the post debate, he should have been SMILING and acting like a winner.

She is a much better charlatan than Donald.


22 posted on 10/19/2016 7:45:04 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Don did fine
23 posted on 10/19/2016 7:45:11 PM PDT by pandemoniumreigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Previous debates she did a lot of that “isn’t that so ridiculous” big-toothed laugh. If she were an R they would have said she “lacked gravitas.” Who laughs when they are accused of serious crimes? Hilliary.

This time, not so much of that laugh.

She looked “caught” multiple times. She had a guilty look. I think he finally cracked her.


24 posted on 10/19/2016 7:45:34 PM PDT by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
Didn't Algore have some trouble accepting the 2000 election results?

Seems to me that there are still a good number of libs that refuse to accept that election.

25 posted on 10/19/2016 7:46:26 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Solson
She was angry and looked like she was tired of even having to be there.

With that silly grin She looked like she at $hit for supper.

26 posted on 10/19/2016 7:47:13 PM PDT by lightman (I'm nobody special...just a follower of the siren call of the Ison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

I’m watching the Trump stream of the debate on Facebook Live, gut i see the subtitles on my TV of what Fox is saying-—what a joke. They are now not different than CNN or anyone else. Totally in the tank for Hillary


27 posted on 10/19/2016 7:47:18 PM PDT by gg188 (Americanism, not Globalism, will be our CREDO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I ask you to watch the debate again and pay attention to one aspect.

Trump looks at the camera the entire time, with moments of looking at Chris or Hillary.

Hillary is constantly reading...looking down at the same spot. Even while Trump is talking. She is reading. Yes, she writes a few notes but never enough to require her to look down and read so often.

I know it sounds nuts. It was driving me crazy, this is why they don’t want her walking around a stage, they want her at a podium, so she can read. Please watch again and tell me I’m not crazy.


28 posted on 10/19/2016 7:47:19 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I don’t care how he did. I am voting for him.


29 posted on 10/19/2016 7:47:27 PM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

To my huge surprise in fact Hillary was this time the talkOverPerp, much more than Donald.

Her talkOver this time maybe equalled that of Don in #1 and #2.

1 - draw more or less, maybe Hillary by a whisker

2 - donald won big

3 - mostly a draw

I was REALLY praying for a whacky head bobbing, or sudden, shocking collapse.

Several times I knelt in fervent prayer for exactly that, alas it was not to be.


30 posted on 10/19/2016 7:48:08 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Hillary did look like she was reaching deep for her memorized and rehearsed answers. She was stop and go most of the night. She wanted to elongate all of her answers and time, thinking that, the person that talks the most, wins.

But, for somebody that’s been in the public eye for 30 or so years, she looked and sounded very pathetic.


31 posted on 10/19/2016 7:48:26 PM PDT by adorno (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

She is so robotic. It’s as if there’s a recording in her, and someone has a remote control to turn it on and off... but then forgets to turn it off. She ran over and over and over again and Wallace would say something to shut her up, but she kept going and he let her. So that was disappointing, tho his Qs were relatively balanced.


32 posted on 10/19/2016 7:48:30 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

37 days


33 posted on 10/19/2016 7:48:37 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

37 days


34 posted on 10/19/2016 7:48:44 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Donald had more of a sense of urgency.


35 posted on 10/19/2016 7:49:06 PM PDT by Son House (The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; the Original Legislative Fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
I guess I'm the wrong gender. I could've sworn Hillary was laying it on THICK with the female voter tonight. SHE MUST'VE SAID "WOMEN" 1,000 TIMES TONIGHT. I think I'll count the number of times later when the text of the debate comes out..

Hillary knows FEMALES DECIDE WHO OUR PRESIDENT IS. It's all about the VAGINA with Hillary. Her campaign is 100% aimed at making women get emotional and casting their vote in favor of America's DEATH just like they did in 2008.

BTW, did anyone notice that when Trump really hit Hillary HARD the camera would switch to a LONG SHOT? This is a network trick to reduce the amount of impact his comment has. YOU DIDN'T FOOL ME, YOU NETWORK PR*CKS.

36 posted on 10/19/2016 7:49:31 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

Rimshot!


37 posted on 10/19/2016 7:51:04 PM PDT by mumblypeg (We've had a p***y in the White House for 8 years. Make America Macho Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
-- Trump not ready to accept the results of the election. --

Taking the pledge didn't help him last time. Plus, he didn't say he wouldn't accept the results. He said he would answer that question later.

38 posted on 10/19/2016 7:51:12 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

I tuned in for give minutes and turned them off. They are so anti Trump it was pathetic.


39 posted on 10/19/2016 7:51:18 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (Love my Steelers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Women can see through her PANDERING to women!!!!


40 posted on 10/19/2016 7:51:58 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson