Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just how dangerous is it to travel at 20 percent the speed of light?
technofres.com ^ | 08/24/2016 | Victor Sopsan

Posted on 08/25/2016 8:57:03 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Breakthrough Starshot is one of the more exciting scientific ideas that has popped up in the past decade, with its promise to deliver hardware to the nearest star in time for many people currently alive to see it.

While the idea would work on paper as an extrapolation of existing technology, there are a lot of details that need to be thoroughly checked out, because it’s possible that one of them could present a show-stopper.

There’s a bit of good news there: Breakthrough Starshot is apparently funding the needed research to give its concept a thorough vetting. A recent posting to the arXiv describes a careful look at the odds of a spacecraft surviving an extended journey at the speeds planned for the trip.

Overall, things look good, but a bit of shielding will be needed, and there’s the potential for a catastrophic collision with a speck of dust. The work, done by a team of four astronomers, focuses on one of the most basic issues: spacecraft survival.

The goal of Breakthrough Starshot is to accelerate its craft to about 20 percent the speed of light. At that speed, even individual atoms can damage the vehicle, and a collision with a bit of dust could be catastrophic. So the team set out to quantify just how risky these collisions could be.

The space between here and the nearest star isn’t completely empty. Earlier generations of stars have left a sparse collection of tiny dust particles, and various processes have left individual atoms scattered through the interstellar space. These particles pose very distinct risks, and the team worked through each separately.

(Excerpt) Read more at technofres.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Travel
KEYWORDS: light; lightspeed; speedoflight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: jpsb

Yeah but...there’s “only” a one in a thousand chance of that, they say.


21 posted on 08/25/2016 9:20:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

That’s what I meant. I would be younger than I otherwise would be.


22 posted on 08/25/2016 9:23:36 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Thanks for posting. 1000 to 1 odds does not sound that good. They will need something to detect, deflect and/or or destroy the matter. Perhaps one or more unmanned shield vehicles in front of the craft that absorb the crap and provide a wake the manned craft can ride behind. As one blows up you still have more shields remaining.


23 posted on 08/25/2016 9:26:30 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When I’m transported to Heaven at light speed+, I’ll let you know how it felt. :)


24 posted on 08/25/2016 9:27:16 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

You are only as old as you felt, ok, maybe
a little more.

Anyway, the 20% isn’t dangerous, 21% is.

The universe only seems empty, the faster you go
the more solid it gets.


25 posted on 08/25/2016 9:29:57 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
One in a thousand is better than the sailing ships of old when we started to explore the oceans.

26 posted on 08/25/2016 9:34:43 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well since we have never been to interstellar space we really do not know the mass density of interstellar space. It is thought to be quite empty however the occasional gran of sand does exist. 1,000 to 1 are pretty good odds if they are correct. Let’s hope they are.


27 posted on 08/25/2016 9:39:44 AM PDT by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just leave your physical body behind and it is not hard at all.


28 posted on 08/25/2016 9:45:33 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Ahh, now we know. Those are NOT stars in the sky, it’s only various size dust spots hitting our atmosphere.


29 posted on 08/25/2016 10:07:26 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Oh, man, that is so relative.


30 posted on 08/25/2016 10:14:25 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
According to Special Relativity, mass increases as you approach speed of light, and would be infinite mass at that speed.

Heavy man.

There's your reason right there. Matter cannot travel at SOL.

31 posted on 08/25/2016 10:15:13 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It depends. If you have a beer in one hand and a cell phone in the other, it might be more dangerous.


32 posted on 08/25/2016 10:25:37 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

We already have the propulsion technology to go 10% of the speed of light by using nukes to propel the vehicle.


33 posted on 08/25/2016 10:25:37 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Matter cannot travel at SOL.

What's an 'event' horizon then?

Besides, it's all relative - right? :)

34 posted on 08/25/2016 10:31:23 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Well since we have never been to interstellar space...

Voyager Goes Interstellar

35 posted on 08/25/2016 10:48:19 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
According to Special Relativity, mass increases as you approach speed of light, and would be infinite mass at that speed.

Ever wonder why electrons in an electric circuit do not have infinite mass since they apparently travel at the speed of light?

36 posted on 08/25/2016 11:02:21 AM PDT by itsahoot (GOP says, Vote Trump. But if your principles won't let you, Hillary is OK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Does it have a hemi?


37 posted on 08/25/2016 11:24:15 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hey, at 70K plus mph, I’d want the best and brightest coders working on the collision avoidance systems.

Yur gonna need a pretty impressive shield too.. a force field would be nice. :-)


38 posted on 08/25/2016 3:35:51 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Traveling twice the speed of sound it’s easy to get burned.


39 posted on 08/25/2016 3:40:48 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

40 posted on 08/25/2016 3:47:00 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson