Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just how dangerous is it to travel at 20 percent the speed of light?
technofres.com ^ | 08/24/2016 | Victor Sopsan

Posted on 08/25/2016 8:57:03 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Breakthrough Starshot is one of the more exciting scientific ideas that has popped up in the past decade, with its promise to deliver hardware to the nearest star in time for many people currently alive to see it.

While the idea would work on paper as an extrapolation of existing technology, there are a lot of details that need to be thoroughly checked out, because it’s possible that one of them could present a show-stopper.

There’s a bit of good news there: Breakthrough Starshot is apparently funding the needed research to give its concept a thorough vetting. A recent posting to the arXiv describes a careful look at the odds of a spacecraft surviving an extended journey at the speeds planned for the trip.

Overall, things look good, but a bit of shielding will be needed, and there’s the potential for a catastrophic collision with a speck of dust. The work, done by a team of four astronomers, focuses on one of the most basic issues: spacecraft survival.

The goal of Breakthrough Starshot is to accelerate its craft to about 20 percent the speed of light. At that speed, even individual atoms can damage the vehicle, and a collision with a bit of dust could be catastrophic. So the team set out to quantify just how risky these collisions could be.

The space between here and the nearest star isn’t completely empty. Earlier generations of stars have left a sparse collection of tiny dust particles, and various processes have left individual atoms scattered through the interstellar space. These particles pose very distinct risks, and the team worked through each separately.

(Excerpt) Read more at technofres.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Travel
KEYWORDS: light; lightspeed; speedoflight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2016 8:57:03 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It’s not the speed - it’s the sudden stop that gets you.


2 posted on 08/25/2016 8:58:20 AM PDT by Fido969 (Maybe I';ve been posting for the last 10 years, and rather than spew cr@p you could look up my posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
a sufficiently large dust particle will create a collision energetic enough to destroy a craft. And “sufficiently large” isn’t very big; the authors estimate that it only has to be 15 micrometers across to kill off the craft. Fortunately, dust particles this size are rare, and the authors calculate the odds of running into one at 1050 to one against.

"Goldberg would love to do it!"

3 posted on 08/25/2016 8:58:43 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Dunno. I think you come out younger.


4 posted on 08/25/2016 9:00:36 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

I wouldn’t want to hit some space junk at that speed.


5 posted on 08/25/2016 9:00:48 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

6 posted on 08/25/2016 9:01:45 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They tumble blindly as they make their way across the universe.


7 posted on 08/25/2016 9:02:51 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If you’re a photon...not dangerous at all.


8 posted on 08/25/2016 9:03:48 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216
Dunno. I think you come out younger.

Well...no. Everyone not travelling at that speed ages normally. You would age slower. Not in reverse.

9 posted on 08/25/2016 9:05:16 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

10 posted on 08/25/2016 9:05:25 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Why don’t they ask capt kirk how they did it?


11 posted on 08/25/2016 9:07:06 AM PDT by lurk (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If there is a single object in the universe traveling at 20% of the speed of light, then we are already traveling at 20% of the speed of light


12 posted on 08/25/2016 9:08:30 AM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

lol


13 posted on 08/25/2016 9:09:24 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Given we are no where near achieving that velocity, its not dangerous at all.


14 posted on 08/25/2016 9:10:36 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakthrough_Starshot


15 posted on 08/25/2016 9:11:52 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Thanks for posting, it's in our genes to continue to push the speed record, and explore. I think both go hand in hand.

Micro particles could possibly be dealt with using some arrangement of electrostatic fields, the larger grains with lasers, and the even larger objects by avoidance.

In pursuit of speed and journey, we often find solutions to problems along the way.

And while we may not be able to exceed the speed of light, I personally have found no reason we can't out run it.

16 posted on 08/25/2016 9:12:10 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
A grain of sand carries a lot of (kinetic) energy at .2C hitting one would be like setting off an A bomb. This space ship better hope it does not encounter anything more massive then a heavy molecule on its' trip to the stars.
17 posted on 08/25/2016 9:15:59 AM PDT by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

There needs to be a way to create a protective layer around the craft using energy.

Shields up!


18 posted on 08/25/2016 9:16:07 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (It appears as if Trump is our Yeltsin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Exactly!

Still, my brain hurts.


19 posted on 08/25/2016 9:17:11 AM PDT by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage
If there is a single object in the universe traveling at 20% of the speed of light, then we are already traveling at 20% of the speed of light

Hmmmm, I am going to have to think about that, but I would be surprised if matter falling into a black hole was not traveling at speeds approaching light.

20 posted on 08/25/2016 9:18:50 AM PDT by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson