| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 09/01/2016 4:58:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
per poster’s request |
Posted on 05/06/2016 9:57:00 PM PDT by LucyT
Amazing that the water breaks to that large a degree because of two little antennas but there’s not water breaking similarly anywhere else in the image.
And there is something grayish sticking up above the engine in the one image that rx posted, and a large object in front of the door in another image. Surely you don’t think those are just the waves too?
Then how can they be upright in the water with lifejacket not even touching the water? Multiple people at multiple times.
What’s making that shadow on the wing there?
Should have said the USCG said they CUT - not tore - the lifejacket off of “Fuddy”.
delete your cookies for maui news and you will probably be able to read it
Kinda like this.
This is ridiculous.
If they weren’t standing on an outcropping of the ocean floor, then how were they able to be upright in the water when their lifejacket wasn’t touching the water? Again, multiple people at multiple times.
Also bear in mind that this video has had the exif data removed so any editing could have been done and we would only know by how disjointed the transition from one frame to another is - which is easy to justify since Puentes was bobbling the camera above and under the water, videotaping feet and bubbles, etc the whole time. What we’re seeing is what Puentes and ABC and the NTSB wanted us to see.
We’ll find out just how trustworthy they all are...
But I eagerly await your answer to explain Yamamoto and Rosa, for example, being upright in the water when their lifejackets are not even touching the water.
Nobody is forcing you to read.
Or are they?
What two things are sticking out of the water in the 3 top plane images at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3428362/posts?page=425#425 ?
And it’s mighty funny turbulence/ripples, to be gray and have a definite shape like what appears in that 2nd image.
And I notice nobody is tackling what that object is in front of the door...
I don’t know how to delete cookies. But if the headline says that Bruce Briley says in his book that Fuddy died in his arms, then the article isn’t even accurate, because Briley doesn’t say that in his book.
I suspect that you have misunderstood my post, but I don’t know you. Perhaps you’re simply rude to everyone.
Have you ever swam in the ocean? And I don’t mean just along the shore. On your back, up right or on your stomach are all possible.
Why do they want us to see anything? If this is a covert operation why film it and then release the film?
If you think a conversation is “ridiculous” then why waste your time on it?
Was it you who added “zot” to the keywords? Is that the plan so that these questions don’t have to be addressed? Zot the poster(s) and the issue goes away?
In case you missed it, rx has said several times that the evidence is in the hands of people who will carry this forward even if unpopular voices get zotted from Free Republic. This is much bigger than anybody here (except rodguy911) is willing to even consider. If the factual evidence is not welcome on Free Republic, amongst Free Republic’s “conservatives”, it says something.
You’re saying that in the ocean it is normal to “float” upright, with lifejackets not even touching the water?
Just for the record and to make sure I’m understanding what you’re saying, you’re saying that is normal? A person can go out into the deep water of the ocean and just stand there upright in the water without touching anything on the ground?
I didn’t say the conversation was ridiculous, you clod. I meant that this explanation of what happened was another lie from the democrats. As usual.
Go bully someone else.
This is just a guess but by filming it and there were two go-pros they really wanted to make people believe that fuddy was dead.IF so they might have done exactly what they did.
I don’t think she is dead of course.I think timing was key since the boom may have been getting ready to be lowered on her.Seems she found about a hundred grand or so to pay down her mtge. on a salary of a lot less than that. Also she was about to be interviewed or deposed and would have to answer some very tricky questions about the bc. A link I am still looking for.
The links below will give the reader an idea of what was going on. If you get a chance to thoroughly read them things start to make more sense.I still have one more to find.
.......................
http://www.westernjournalism.com/shocking-allegations-loretta-fuddy-paid-cover-obama/
....................
http://freedomoutpost.com/obama-birth-certificate-shocker-evidence-deceased-hawaii-health-director-loretta-fuddy-paid/
.............
http://freedomoutpost.com/obama-birth-certificate-shocker-evidence-deceased-hawaii-health-director-loretta-fuddy-paid/
If I understand this correctly, the woman made less than $100,000 yet managed to pay down her mortgage by well over $100,000 in a single year. For example, it sounds as if she could have made $90,000 and paid $140,000 toward her mortgage. How does that happen? That money came from somewhere. Could it be legitimate? Absolutely. But it doesn’t look good.
The Mr. Vogt who is referenced above is Doug Vogt who brought some attention to Fuddy’s financials in an interview just one week before her death. Just one week? That seems to be a little more than coincidental.
You may recall that Tim Adams, a Hawaii Elections official, submitted a sworn affidavit of his own in 2011. His claim is that no Hawaii birth certificate ever existed:
In a sworn affidavit dated and witnessed on January 20, 2011 Adams states, “Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government.”
So let’s summarize what we know to be true at this point:
A Hawaii government official swears that no Hawaii long-form birth certificate ever existed.
Loretta Fuddy issues a “certificate of live birth” (not to be confused with an official birth certificate which would include extras like foot prints).
Loretta Fuddy allegedly came into some extra money that she applied to her mortgage.
Doug Vogt revealed that Fuddy came into some extra money in a radio interview.
A week later Fuddy is dead and the media totally botches the story.
What conclusion are we supposed to come to?
Why is it that some people who appear to have vital information about Barack Obama end up dead?
Maybe it is just another one of those astounding coincidences that seem to happen over and over with big name politicians.
Wrong again, bucko. Jake's ponytail is down to the middle of his back, at least.
That's Jake (just over Rosa's shoulder) just before he climbed onto the wing and that is his ponytail down to the middle of his back.
The video was an attempt to discredit those who questioned the narrative. Donald Trump was one name/quote that they listed in the Nightline clip...
We’ll find out more about ABC as this thing goes along, but for now there’s the answer that is easy to see just by watching the Nightline clip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.