Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I've Never Said This Before – But It's Time For You To Start Buying Guns and Ammo
LouderWithCrowder.com ^ | 06/27/2015 | Steven Crowder

Posted on 06/27/2015 11:54:07 AM PDT by StevenCrowder

I've pasted the whole column below. But there is a video that can only be seen on the site/not embedded here. So please, if you support my work, visit the site. If not, no problem.

"Now before you label this as a “crazy” post, I’m not talking about, nor am I predicting some doomsday scenario. Don’t expect me to be selling you seeds, food preserves or bomb shelters anytime soon. That is not what I am suggesting here.

I’m also not suggesting that you need to buy yourself an AR15 to fight off an onslot of newly married gays. Okay? Okay. So please do more than glance at this headline, and allow me to make my case.

What I am suggesting is that this week, in two monumental rulings, the SCOTUS has showed us that they are no longer bound by, nor do they hold any respect for the United States Constitution. For guns, that matters.

The SCOTUS has now declared all healthcare, and marriage to be fundamental human rights. So much so, that it is now the job of the federal government to force them upon both you as an individual, and the state as law. Now, I don’t see either of these things in the United States Constitution.

Crazy thing about the Constitution, is that it actually does outline our rights, pretty expressly. As a matter of fact, one could argue that it’s the purpose of the document. Enumerated and all that jazz. Healthcare and gay marriage… isn’t in there. You know what is? Your right to own a gun.

As a matter of fact, according to the Constitution, that is one of the very few rights in which the states are not reserved the right to regulate entirely as they see fit. In case you haven’t read it, let me paste it for you below.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Pretty cut and dry. Yet unlike marriage, unlike subsidized health Insurance, SCOTUS has allowed states to, in fact… INFRINGE! Hell, some states have made it pragmatically impossible to carry a weapon on your person. So clearly, when it comes to even using the Constitution as a guideline, the SCOTUS has jumped the shark.

Regardless of where you line up on same-sex marriage, or even if you personally want free healthcare, there is no arguing that the SCOTUS has displayed an unprecedented use of power when compared to the entirety of American history. There’s also no argument about the fact that the SCOTUS is leaning more and more to the left.

The left has been very, very clear on their ambitions to make guns harder and harder to access. For all citizens. Not just criminals. We know their playbook. I’m not saying that your guns will be taken away tomorrow, but that is the end-game.

What is beyond any shadow of a doubt however, is that the SCOTUS has now been given the power, to infringe on your right to bear arms. They could come down with some ruling next June requiring guns to be limited to some arbitrary loading capacity, rendering all of your firearms illegal. I’m not saying that they will, but for the first time in our adult lives, this is entirely within the realm of possibility.

We also have already witnessed the great ammo shortage of 2008-2013. Pragmatically speaking, the SCOTUS has myriad ways in which they could – should they choose – systematically disarm American citizens, but equally important is the way the market responds to SCOTUS decisions. The tides are turning on guns. It’s a losing issue for Democrats, so they could never address it head-on. They could however, enforce what would seem to be a very marginal gun law, which could in turn force firearm companies to change their procedures (be it manufacturing, distribution etc.), causing a shortage, raising prices making it nigh impossible for you, the American citizen to purchase a firearm.

So if for any reason, you’ve ever wanted to buy a firearm but haven’t gotten around to it, I highly suggest that you do so soon. Because at the very least, we are in uncharted territory as Americans, and it’s better for you to have made your decision now, than to be on the outside, banging on the door to get in."


TOPICS: Hobbies; Miscellaneous; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; blogpimp; guns; rights; scotus; stevencrowder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: StevenCrowder
Every American man over 21 should own an AR-15 with 6 30-round magazines and 1,000 rounds.

He can and should acquire more, but that's the minimum.

41 posted on 06/27/2015 12:52:16 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenCrowder
onslot of newly married gays

This makes me feel dirty... did you mean onslaught?

42 posted on 06/27/2015 12:55:21 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Yep. - I was raised by a father who had been an infantryman in WWII; had been in N. Africa, Sicily, Italy & Germany. When Truman (the U.S.) dropped the atomic bomb, he was still in the Army, looking at a possibly one-way trip to Japan. - I was raised with guns & “registration” was a foreign concept.


43 posted on 06/27/2015 12:58:01 PM PDT by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

So you’re old enough to remember when this was a free country.


44 posted on 06/27/2015 1:00:11 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair

I would itemize, with one “bill of sale” or notice that the firearms had been given as a gift for each child. The point is to provide evidence created prior to any change in the law that legal ownership had already been transferred. Since the paper and writing will be old, that will be proof that your kids legally owned the guns before any new laws were passed if they ever need proof. Then when you transfer physical possession tell them to store the letters in their gun safes; no need to present the proof unless demanded.


45 posted on 06/27/2015 1:00:55 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

I tried to correct it... but it was too late for FREEP


46 posted on 06/27/2015 1:25:06 PM PDT by StevenCrowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: StevenCrowder

Apparently our government is NOT afraid of its citizens. Perhaps this is something that needs to change.


47 posted on 06/27/2015 1:28:49 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

And for those of us who had to fill out a BATFE Form 4473 for each gun purchase, that registers only the point of initial sale. There is as yet no legal requirement to report the sale of a firearm (in most states).

An old saying has it, “In order for there to be a registration law, there has to be a deregistration law.”

If the Feds show up at your door with a stack of 4473’s & demand “Where are they?”, the reply is, “Sold ‘em all.”

What are they going to do then, arrest you? Probably, they’ll have a ready excuse. Welcome to the new normal.


48 posted on 06/27/2015 1:35:09 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: StevenCrowder; Jane Long; mylife; SolidRedState; PROCON; TigersEye; EveningStar; katykelly; ...


Sorry so late to the thread. I just woke up.
49 posted on 06/27/2015 1:44:05 PM PDT by RandallFlagg ("When you have to shoot, SHOOT! Don't talk." --Tuco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
If the Feds show up at your door with a stack of 4473’s & demand “Where are they?”, the reply is, “Sold ‘em all.”

WRONG.

The correct answer is: "Do you have a search warrant or an arrest warrant? If so, then I will be more than happy to assist in your investigation with my attorney present. If not, please get off of my property".

50 posted on 06/27/2015 2:44:27 PM PDT by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

http://youtu.be/6tDHRrUyPDM


51 posted on 06/27/2015 2:55:18 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: StevenCrowder

If you have waited until now, you are way behind.


52 posted on 06/27/2015 2:57:38 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

Never too late for new people to try.


53 posted on 06/27/2015 3:21:28 PM PDT by StevenCrowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Yes; a free country. My poor old Daddy was left just about stone deaf by the loud noises during combat. He just about loved FDR; Eleanor not so much, was ticked off at her being so powerful. FDR was his CIC. Daddy just about detested draft dodgers for a long time; then when he got older & Bill the Pill Clinton came along, he regarded him as just a boy who didn’t want to go into combat & EXCUSED that weasel. He died before Hillary began REALLY wielding power in this country (& others). In the Bible, Proverbs I think; it talks about when “women rule over them”, and speaks of it as if it’s a shameful thing. As for gays in the military; he had no use for having them in combat; said they generally washed out during basic training. He was tough. The hearing problem kept him in the dark a lot; & hearing aids didn’t help. If he could see Obama & what he’s doing; he would flip out & really see what the democrat party has done to this country. You miss a lot of nuances when your hearing is gone. (He knew I couldn’t abide the Clintons.)


54 posted on 06/27/2015 3:55:05 PM PDT by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

God bless him!


55 posted on 06/27/2015 4:01:21 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Basically, SCOTUS said intent no longer matters... for proving housing discrimination (for now, but in a generation, it WILL be applied to criminal law, guaranteed)

You're behind the times. Most of the Federal laws, as extended by regulations, that ensure pretty much every American citizen, especially if they are in business, commits three felonies a day, have no mens rea element to their definition.

56 posted on 06/27/2015 4:13:50 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce
Any other pearls of wisdom would you care to grant the unwashed masses?

I'll chime in.....There ain't going to be a revolution in yours or mine lifetime as long as you so called revolutionaries have jobs to work, mortgages to pay, payments on your new trucks, SUV's and boats and most importantly, your kids' soccer and football games this weekend..........

If your calendar is clear, maybe next weekend the revolution will start.........but I doubt it.......LOL!

57 posted on 06/27/2015 4:16:32 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: StevenCrowder

way ahead of the curve on this.


58 posted on 06/27/2015 4:24:08 PM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenCrowder
Well, I think guns are icky and I would never own one myself. That said, it may not have been a terrible idea to wait until now, because both S&W and Ruger have very nice little entry-level ARs that might do very nicely. Trigger's a little heavy on the Ruger but it's smooth enough like most Ruger triggers. No chrome lining on the S&W barrel but for five and a half bills it isn't bad. Quad rails on the Ruger, which I don't really care for but if you're mounting something other than just optics they're pretty nice.

I did buy some ammo today. Not a great price, but a good price. But no guns. Wouldn't have one of those.

59 posted on 06/27/2015 4:33:09 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StevenCrowder

Couldn’t care less what you’ve said. Your blog thread you started here assumes we give a rats ass about your comments, as though no one ever bought guns and ammo before because YOU didn’t tell them to.

Jeez, get over yourself. You saying so means nothing to nobody. What a narcissist.


60 posted on 06/27/2015 5:09:15 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson