Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experiment confirms quantum theory weirdness
PhysOrg ^ | 5/27/15

Posted on 05/28/2015 6:02:31 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: mosaicwolf

Now I know why Freud used heroin to understand reality.

I shall remain in a state of wishful ignorance.
Both particle and wave.


41 posted on 05/28/2015 8:26:59 PM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The original 1998 version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Donuts, math, and superdense teleportation of quantum information
http://phys.org/news/2015-05-donuts-math-superdense-teleportation-quantum.html


42 posted on 05/28/2015 8:43:12 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Lol. I just sent that to my kids in two separate consecutive text messages. Now they are thinking “there goes Dad again!”


43 posted on 05/28/2015 8:51:59 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

I maintain that the language of weirdness is all predicated on an attempt to retain a classical concept of objects. The correct view is that objects are emergent constructs of multiple quantum events. I don’t see why people can’t just accept this, as Feynman advocated.
++++
That could be. But accepting it is one thing and understanding it is quite another. But then again, even as a child, we all learned that rocks fall down not up. Now that makes sense to us despite the fact that we really don’t understand gravity much better than we do quarks.


44 posted on 05/28/2015 8:52:08 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I think, therefor I used to be.


45 posted on 05/28/2015 9:31:35 PM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
But then again, even as a child, we all learned that rocks fall down not up. Now that makes sense to us despite the fact that we really don’t understand gravity much better than we do quarks.

In his DE RERUM NATURA Lucretius accepts the immediate subjective experience of downwardness as a universal principle, and expounds on it at length, ridiculing the notion of a spherical earth as a patent impossibility.

It is true that "falling down" still makes sense to us, even though most of us are ready to admit that the idea is based on particular circumstances, and has been supplanted by central force gravitation in a more general understanding.

So I'm saying that the "weirdness" talk is analogous to Lucretius' POV, in that it refuses to abandon the classical object as a universal principle.

46 posted on 05/30/2015 8:26:05 AM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 4Speed

You're a bad man!

47 posted on 05/30/2015 8:49:20 AM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Children understand this, if moms not looking, it either didn’t happen, or “Not Me” did it...


48 posted on 05/30/2015 6:59:01 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
Thanks LibWhacker.

· String Theory Ping List ·
Periodic Table of Rejected Elements
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


49 posted on 06/01/2015 7:55:44 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"At the quantum level, reality does not exist if you are not looking at it" Um, no, it exists as potential wave and particle. Measuring interrupts the particle's interactions with the zero point field, causing a favoring of one or the other (particle or wave form) based upon the imbalance of wave form impacts with the zp field dictated by the measuring parameters.
50 posted on 06/01/2015 8:32:39 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I agree with you, Fred. Quantum Reality is quite mundane if viewed through the point of view of the very small. It’s onl when we try to apply our macro object experience to the quantum world that it seems so strange.

Light is neither particle nor wave.


51 posted on 06/01/2015 5:06:02 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson