Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earthquake fault heightens California tsunami threat, experts say
L A Times ^ | Rong-Gong Lin II

Posted on 04/21/2015 7:12:46 AM PDT by BenLurkin

The earthquake fault cuts through the heart of Ventura's quaint downtown, past the ornate hilltop City Hall and historic Spanish-era mission before heading into the Pacific Ocean..

For decades, some seismic experts believed the Ventura fault posed only a moderate threat and was incapable of producing a major temblor.

But research in recent years shows that the fault is extremely dangerous, capable of producing an earthquake as large as magnitude 8 as well as severe tsunamis that until now experts didn't believe were possible from a Southern California quake.

Such a big earthquake on the fault estimated to occur every 400 to 2,400 years, experts said. The last sizable quake on the Ventura area hit about 800 years ago. Large temblors occur on this fault less frequently than on the San Andreas fault, which has long been considered the state's most dangerous.

The California Geological Survey is studying whether it needs to revise tsunami hazard maps because of the researchers' findings. One study found that the inundation would be "severe right along the coast" but didn't call for redrawing evacuation zones farther inland.

"We're not done looking at it," said Rick Wilson, a California Geological Survey senior engineering geologist. "If new information comes forward, we'll change the lines to make sure the communities are as safe as possible."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: california; earthquake; fault; globalwarminghoax; tsunami; ventura; venturafault

1 posted on 04/21/2015 7:12:46 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Global warming. Now tell us how you plan on fixing this with a 100 billion dollars.


2 posted on 04/21/2015 7:17:07 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (two if by van, one if by broom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I guess the stoners in California would look at it as the “Big Wave”....plenty good surfin’


3 posted on 04/21/2015 7:17:46 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Escalators!!!!! One billion each!


4 posted on 04/21/2015 7:18:18 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Experts” are amazing. Simple conclusion from a simple man: major earthquakes can happen anywhere, anytime.


5 posted on 04/21/2015 7:19:59 AM PDT by exnavy (government should be neither seen or heard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

We (Pac NW)get a lot of our petroleum products from that areas refineries as well as food. People don’t realize they need to prep for what is happening in another part of the country.


6 posted on 04/21/2015 7:57:49 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Probably the greatest threat to California is if the Hawaiian Big Island had a partial collapse.


7 posted on 04/21/2015 9:10:26 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well, they’ve been crying for WATER, haven’t they?


8 posted on 04/21/2015 9:20:05 AM PDT by FrankR (They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

took a while to read through to find out what type of fault this on is a thrust fault, the one plate is pushing under the other.. now that would cause a really big quake


9 posted on 04/21/2015 9:28:13 AM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Can it tip over like Guam. That would be really bad.


10 posted on 04/21/2015 11:32:29 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pas
There are several possibilities. Mauna Loa is 4,169 meters above sea level, and 5,000 meters below, with one ocean flank close to vertical. Think of that gigantic, below sea wall, being pressured from within. If it bursts... Here are the volcanoes of the Big Island. http://i.imgur.com/Fz4zsQX.png Interestingly enough, Mauna Loa and the more active Kīlauea do not share a magma pool, so erupt independently from each other. But the much more massive Mauna Loa is slumping eastward along its southwestern rift zone, leveraging its mass into Kīlauea and driving the latter eastward at a rate of about 4 inches per year.
11 posted on 04/21/2015 12:34:14 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; 75thOVI; Abathar; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; ...
Thanks BenLurkin.

12 posted on 04/22/2015 10:56:21 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson